View Filing Data

Print Document View Excel Document

Document and Entity Information - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
Document and Entity Information - USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2013	Mar. 08, 2013	Jul. 31, 2012
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jan. 31, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Trading Symbol	SAI
Entity Registrant Name	SAIC, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001336920
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--01-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	Yes
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		341,917,569
Entity Public Float			$ 3,314,483,629
Science Applications International Corporation
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jan. 31, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Entity Registrant Name	SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0000353394
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--01-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	Yes
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		5,000

Consolidated Statements Of Income - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
Consolidated Statements Of Income - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Revenues	$ 11,173	$ 10,497	$ 10,798
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues	9,809	9,530	9,374
Selling, general and administrative expenses	592	668	495
Separation transaction expenses	38
Operating income	734	299	929
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest income	9	5	2
Interest expense	(93)	(114)	(79)
Other income, net	8	5	2
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	658	195	854
Provision for income taxes	(135)	(210)	(307)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	523	(15)	547
Discontinued operations (Note 16):
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes	17	129	107
Provision for income taxes	(15)	(55)	(35)
Income from discontinued operations	2	74	72
Net income	$ 525	$ 59	$ 619
Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$ 1.54	$ (0.04)	$ 1.46
Income from discontinued operations		0.22	0.19
Basic earnings (loss) per share	1.54	0.18	1.65
Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	1.54	(0.04)	1.45
Income from discontinued operations		0.22	0.19
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	1.54	$ 0.18	$ 1.64
Cash dividend per common share	$ 0.48
Science Applications International Corporation
Revenues	$ 11,173	$ 10,497	$ 10,798
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues	9,809	9,530	9,374
Selling, general and administrative expenses	592	668	495
Separation transaction expenses	38
Operating income	734	299	929
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest income	10	5	2
Interest expense	(93)	(119)	(94)
Other income, net	8	5	2
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	659	190	839
Provision for income taxes	(135)	(208)	(300)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	524	(18)	539
Discontinued operations (Note 16):
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes	17	129	107
Provision for income taxes	(15)	(55)	(35)
Income from discontinued operations	2	74	72
Net income	$ 526	$ 56	$ 611

Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Net income	$ 525	$ 59	$ 619
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(1)	8
Deferred taxes	1	(4)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		4
Reclassification of realized loss on settled derivative instruments to net income		1	1
Deferred taxes		(1)
Reclassification of realized loss on settled derivative instruments to net income, net of tax			1
Pension liability adjustments	14	(13)	12
Deferred taxes	(5)	5	(3)
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax	9	(8)	9
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	9	(4)	10
Comprehensive income	534	55	629
Science Applications International Corporation
Net income	526	56	611
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(1)	8
Deferred taxes	1	(4)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		4
Reclassification of realized loss on settled derivative instruments to net income		1	1
Deferred taxes		(1)
Reclassification of realized loss on settled derivative instruments to net income, net of tax			1
Pension liability adjustments	14	(13)	12
Deferred taxes	(5)	5	(3)
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax	9	(8)	9
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	9	(4)	10
Comprehensive income	$ 535	$ 52	$ 621

Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 736	$ 1,592
Receivables, net	1,889	2,164
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	454	439
Assets of discontinued operations		36
Total current assets	3,079	4,231
Property, plant and equipment, net	318	348
Intangible assets, net	190	176
Goodwill	2,195	1,800
Deferred income taxes	14	37
Other assets	79	75
Total assets	5,875	6,667
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,249	1,961
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	542	504
Notes payable and long-term debt, current portion	2	553
Liabilities of discontinued operations		7
Total current liabilities	1,793	3,025
Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion	1,296	1,299
Other long-term liabilities	168	162
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13, 17 and 18)
Stockholder's equity:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 10 million shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2013 and 2012
Common stock
Additional paid-in capital	2,110	2,028
Retained earnings	510	164
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2)	(11)
Total stockholders' equity	2,618	2,181
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	5,875	6,667
Science Applications International Corporation
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	736	1,592
Receivables, net	1,889	2,164
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	454	439
Assets of discontinued operations		36
Total current assets	3,079	4,231
Property, plant and equipment, net	318	348
Intangible assets, net	190	176
Goodwill	2,195	1,800
Deferred income taxes	14	37
Other assets	79	75
Total assets	5,875	6,667
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,249	1,961
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	542	504
Notes payable and long-term debt, current portion	2	553
Liabilities of discontinued operations		7
Total current liabilities	1,793	3,025
Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion	1,296	1,299
Note payable to SAIC, Inc.	22	120
Other long-term liabilities	168	162
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13, 17 and 18)
Stockholder's equity:
Common stock
Additional paid-in capital	233	233
Retained earnings	2,365	1,839
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2)	(11)
Total stockholders' equity	2,596	2,061
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 5,875	$ 6,667

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common stock, shares authorized	2,000,000,000	2,000,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	342,000,000	341,000,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	342,000,000	341,000,000
Science Applications International Corporation
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	10,000	10,000
Common stock, shares issued	5,000	5,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	5,000	5,000

Consolidated Statements Of Stockholders' Equity - USD ($) $ in Millions	Total	Shares of Common stock	Additional paid-in capital	Retained earnings	Accumulated other comprehensive loss	Science Applications International Corporation	Science Applications International Corporation Shares of Common stock	Science Applications International Corporation Additional paid-in capital	Science Applications International Corporation Retained earnings	Science Applications International Corporation Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Balance, value at Jan. 31, 2010	$ 2,291		$ 2,096	$ 212	$ (17)	$ 1,388		$ 233	$ 1,172	$ (17)
Balance, shares at Jan. 31, 2010		388,000,000					5,000
Net income	619			619		611			611
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	10				10	10				10
Issuances of stock, value	83		83
Issuances of stock, shares		9,000,000
Repurchases of stock, value	(625)		(202)	(423)
Repurchases of stock, shares		(35,000,000)
Adjustments for income tax benefits from stock-based compensation	11		11
Stock-based compensation	102		102
Balance, value at Jan. 31, 2011	2,491		2,090	408	(7)	2,009		233	1,783	(7)
Balance, shares at Jan. 31, 2011		362,000,000					5,000
Net income	59			59		56			56
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(4)				(4)	(4)				(4)
Issuances of stock, value	44		44
Issuances of stock, shares		8,000,000
Repurchases of stock, value	(478)		(175)	(303)
Repurchases of stock, shares		(29,000,000)
Adjustments for income tax benefits from stock-based compensation	(16)		(16)
Stock-based compensation	85		85
Balance, value at Jan. 31, 2012	2,181		2,028	164	(11)	2,061		233	1,839	(11)
Balance, shares at Jan. 31, 2012		341,000,000					5,000
Net income	525			525		526			526
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	9				9	9				9
Issuances of stock, value	24		24
Issuances of stock, shares		2,000,000
Repurchases of stock, value	(22)		(10)	(12)
Repurchases of stock, shares		(1,000,000)
Cash dividend of $0.48 per common share	(167)			(167)
Adjustments for income tax benefits from stock-based compensation	(16)		(16)
Stock-based compensation	84		84
Balance, value at Jan. 31, 2013	$ 2,618		$ 2,110	$ 510	$ (2)	$ 2,596		$ 233	$ 2,365	$ (2)
Balance, shares at Jan. 31, 2013		342,000,000					5,000

Consolidated Statements Of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 $ / shares
Cash dividend per share	$ 0.12

Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations:
Net income	$ 525	$ 59	$ 619
Income from discontinued operations	(2)	(74)	(72)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization	113	114	110
Stock-based compensation	84	83	99
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation			(11)
Impairment losses	13	19	4
Net gain on sales and disposals of assets	(6)	(31)	(5)
Other items	4	(1)	1
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures, resulting from changes in:
Receivables	325	(51)	(18)
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	(64)	(93)	(29)
Deferred income taxes	72	(9)	9
Other assets	(5)	(22)	(2)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(744)	757	(16)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	36	1	24
Income taxes payable		5	6
Other long-term liabilities	(6)	5	(9)
Total cash flows provided by operating activities of continuing operations	345	762	710
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(48)	(65)	(73)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired of $9, $5 and $10 in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively	(483)	(218)	(382)
Net proceeds (payments) for purchase price adjustments related to prior year acquisitions	1	(4)
Proceeds from sale of assets	3	85	10
Other		(1)
Total cash flows used in investing activities of continuing operations	(527)	(203)	(445)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations:
Issuance of long-term debt, net of offering costs			742
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt	(554)	(3)	(3)
Sales of stock and exercises of stock options	19	27	38
Dividend payments	(165)
Repurchases of stock	(22)	(471)	(601)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation			11
Other		(2)
Total cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations	(722)	(449)	187
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations	(904)	110	452
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities of discontinued operations	(2)	(52)	4
Cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations	50	166	51
Increase in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations	48	114	55
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1	(1)
Total (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(856)	225	506
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	1,592	1,367	861
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	736	1,592	1,367
Science Applications International Corporation
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations:
Net income	526	56	611
Income from discontinued operations	(2)	(74)	(72)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization	113	114	110
Stock-based compensation	84	83	99
Impairment losses	13	19	4
Net gain on sales and disposals of assets	(6)	(31)	(5)
Other items	3	(1)	1
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures, resulting from changes in:
Receivables	325	(51)	(18)
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	(64)	(93)	(29)
Deferred income taxes	72	(9)	9
Other assets	(5)	(22)	(2)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(744)	757	(16)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	36	1	24
Income taxes payable		5	6
Other long-term liabilities	(6)	5	(9)
Total cash flows provided by operating activities of continuing operations	345	759	713
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(48)	(65)	(73)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired of $9, $5 and $10 in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively	(483)	(218)	(382)
Net proceeds (payments) for purchase price adjustments related to prior year acquisitions	1	(4)
Proceeds from sale of assets	3	85	10
Other		(1)
Total cash flows used in investing activities of continuing operations	(527)	(203)	(445)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations:
Issuance of long-term debt, net of offering costs			742
Proceeds from note with SAIC, Inc.	244	638	1,298
Payments on note with SAIC, Inc.	(411)	(1,079)	(1,853)
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt	(554)	(3)	(3)
Dividend payments	(1)
Other		(2)
Total cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations	(722)	(446)	184
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations	(904)	110	452
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities of discontinued operations	(2)	(52)	4
Cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations	50	166	51
Increase in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations	48	114	55
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1	(1)
Total (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(856)	225	506
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	1,592	1,367	861
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$ 736	$ 1,592	$ 1,367

Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Cash acquired in acquisitions	$ 9	$ 5	$ 10
Science Applications International Corporation
Cash acquired in acquisitions	$ 9	$ 5	$ 10

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

SAIC, Inc. (“SAIC”) is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiary is Science Applications International Corporation (“Science Applications”), a provider of scientific, engineering, systems integration and technical services and solutions in the areas of defense, health, energy, infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and cybersecurity to agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and other U.S. Government civil agencies, state and local government agencies, foreign governments and customers in select commercial markets.

The consolidated financial statements of SAIC include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries, including Science Applications. The consolidated financial statements of Science Applications include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries. SAIC does not have separate operations, assets or liabilities independent of Science Applications, except for a note receivable from Science Applications (the “related party note”), on which Science Applications pays interest to SAIC. From time to time SAIC issues stock to Science Applications employees, which is reflected in SAIC’s Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and results in an increase to the related party note (see Note 8). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

These Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both SAIC and Science Applications. As SAIC consolidates Science Applications for financial statement purposes, disclosures that relate to activities of Science Applications also apply to SAIC. References to the “Company” refer collectively to SAIC, Science Applications, and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise noted.

The Company may dispose (or management may commit to plans to dispose) of components of the business, which are reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Unless otherwise noted, references to years are for fiscal years ended January 31. For example, the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013 is referred to as “fiscal 2013” in these combined notes to consolidated financial statements.

Planned Separation Transaction

In August 2012, the Company announced that its board of directors authorized management to pursue a plan to separate into two independent, publicly traded companies. The proposed separation transaction is intended to take the form of a tax-free spin-off to SAIC stockholders of 100% of the shares of a newly formed company focused on technical, engineering and enterprise information technology (IT) services to the U.S. Government, as well as other public agencies. The separation is expected to occur in the latter half of calendar year 2013, subject to final approval of the board of directors and certain customary conditions, including receipt of an opinion from tax counsel and a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as to the tax-free nature of the transaction. Although the Company expects that the separation of its businesses will be consummated, there can be no assurance that a separation will ultimately occur. Upon completion of the separation transaction, the operating results of the separated business will be included in discontinued operations.

During the year ended January 31, 2013, separation transaction expenses were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31, 2013
	(in millions)
Strategic advisory services	$	18
Investment banking services		3
Legal and accounting services		5
Severance costs		12
Separation transaction expenses in operating income		38
Less: income tax benefit		(15	)
Separation transaction expenses, net of tax	$	23

In connection with the separation transaction, the Company eliminated positions in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 which resulted in severance costs as reflected in the table above.

Consistent with the Company’s policy for acquisitions, the Company has recognized a tax benefit for the separation transaction expenses. Certain of the separation transaction expenses will be capitalized for tax purposes if the separation transaction is completed, resulting in a reversal in discontinued operations of tax benefits previously recognized.

Operating Cycle

The Company’s operating cycle for long-term contracts may be greater than one year and is measured by the average time intervening between the inception and the completion of those contracts. Contract-related assets and liabilities are classified as current assets and current liabilities.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, including those relating to allowances for doubtful accounts, inventories, fair value and impairment of intangible assets and goodwill, income taxes, estimated profitability of long-term contracts, pension benefits, stock-based compensation expense, contingencies and litigation. Estimates and assumptions have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information at the time of estimation and actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenues are generated primarily from contracts with the U.S. Government, commercial customers, and various international, state and local governments or from subcontracts with other contractors engaged in work with such customers. The Company performs under various types of contracts, which include firm-fixed-price, time-and-materials, fixed-price-level-of-effort, cost-plus-fixed-fee, cost-plus-award-fee and cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts.

Firm-fixed-price contracts—Revenues and fees on these contracts that are system integration or engineering in nature are primarily recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting utilizing the cost-to-cost method.

Time-and-materials contracts—Revenue is recognized on time-and-materials contracts with the U.S. Government using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting utilizing an output measure of progress. Revenue is recognized on time-and-materials contracts with non-U.S. Government customers using a proportional performance method. Under both of these methods, revenue is recognized based on the hours provided in performance under the contract multiplied by the negotiated contract billing rates, plus the negotiated contract billing rate of any allowable material and subcontract costs and out-of-pocket expenses.

Fixed-price-level-of-effort contracts (FP-LOE)—These contracts are substantially similar to time-and-materials contracts except they require a specified level of effort over a stated period of time. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue on FP-LOE contracts with the U.S. Government in a manner similar to time-and-materials contracts in which the Company measures progress toward completion based on the hours provided in performance under the contract multiplied by the negotiated contract billing rates, plus the negotiated contract billing rate of any allowable material costs and out-of-pocket expenses.

Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts—Revenue is recognized on cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts with the U.S. Government on the basis of partial performance equal to costs incurred, plus an estimate of applicable fees earned as the Company becomes contractually entitled to reimbursement of costs and the applicable fees.

Cost-plus-award-fee/cost-plus-incentive fee contracts—Revenues and fees on these contracts with the U.S. Government are primarily recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, most often based on the cost-to-cost method. The Company includes an estimate of the ultimate incentive or award fee to be received on the contract in the estimate of contract revenues for purposes of applying the percentage-of-completion method of accounting.

Revenues from services and maintenance contracts, notwithstanding contract type, are recognized over the term of the respective contracts as the services are performed and revenue is earned. Revenues from unit-priced contracts are recognized as transactions are processed based on objective measures of output. Revenues from the sale of manufactured products are recorded upon passage of title and risk of loss to the customer, which is generally upon delivery, provided that all other requirements for revenue recognition have been met.

The Company also uses the efforts-expended method of percentage-of-completion using measures such as labor dollars for measuring progress toward completion in situations in which this approach is more representative of the progress on the contract. For example, the efforts-expended method is utilized when there are significant amounts of materials or hardware procured for the contract that is not representative of progress on the contract. Additionally, the Company utilizes the units-of-delivery method under percentage-of-completion on contracts where separate units of output are produced. Under the units-of-delivery method, revenue is generally recognized when the units are delivered to the customer, provided that all other requirements for revenue recognition have been met.

The Company evaluates its contracts for multiple elements, and when appropriate, separates the contracts into separate units of accounting for revenue recognition.

The Company provides for anticipated losses on contracts by recording an expense during the period in which the losses are determined. Amounts billed and collected but not yet recognized as revenues under certain types of contracts are deferred. Contract costs incurred for U.S. Government contracts, including indirect costs, are subject to audit and adjustment through negotiations between the Company and government representatives. The Company has agreed upon and settled indirect contract costs through fiscal 2005. Revenues on U.S. Government contracts have been recorded in amounts that are expected to be realized upon final settlement.

Contract claims are unanticipated additional costs incurred but not provided for in the executed contract price that the Company seeks to recover from the customer. Such costs are expensed as incurred. Additional revenue related to contract claims is recognized when the amounts are awarded by the customer.

In certain situations, primarily where the Company is not the primary obligor on certain elements of a contract such as the provision of administrative oversight and/or management of government-owned facilities or logistical support services related to other vendors’ products, the Company recognizes as revenue the net management fee associated with the services and excludes from its income statement the gross sales and costs associated with the facility or other vendors’ products.

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Changes in estimates related to certain types of contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes. Changes in these estimates can routinely occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope, changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or retirements of risk for amounts different than estimated, and changes in estimated incentive or award fees. Aggregate changes in contract estimates increased operating income by $18 million ($0.03 per diluted share), $37 million ($0.07 per diluted share) and $44 million ($0.08 per diluted share) for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively.

Receivables

The Company’s accounts receivable include unbilled receivables, which consist of costs and fees billable upon contract completion or the occurrence of a specified event, substantially all of which is expected to be billed and collected within one year. Unbilled receivables are stated at estimated realizable value. Since the Company’s receivables are primarily with the U.S. Government, the Company does not have a material credit risk exposure. Contract retentions are billed when the Company has negotiated final indirect rates with the U.S. Government and, once billed, are subject to audit and approval by government representatives. Consequently, the timing of collection of retention balances is outside the Company’s control. Based on the Company’s historical experience, the majority of retention balances are expected to be collected beyond one year and write-offs of retention balances have not been significant.

The Company has extended deferred payment terms with original contractual maturities that may exceed one year to commercial customers related to certain construction projects. As of January 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding receivables from these customers with deferred payment terms of $104 million, which are expected to be collected in fiscal 2014 when the customers have obtained financing. When events or conditions indicate that amounts outstanding from customers may become uncollectible, an allowance is estimated and recorded.

Discontinued Operations

From time-to-time, the Company may dispose (or management may commit to plans to dispose) of non-strategic components of the business, which are reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Pre-contract Costs

Costs incurred on projects as pre-contract costs are deferred as assets (inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets) when the Company has been requested by the customer to begin work under a new arrangement prior to contract execution and it is probable that the Company will recover the costs through the issuance of a contract. When the formal contract has been executed, the costs are recorded to the contract and revenue is recognized.

Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to certain market risks which are inherent in certain transactions entered into during the normal course of business. These transactions include sales contracts denominated in foreign currencies, investments in equity securities and exposure to changing interest rates. The Company uses a risk management policy to assess and manage cash flow and fair value exposures. The policy permits the use of derivative instruments with certain restrictions. The Company does not hold derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The accounting standard for fair value measurements establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets (Level 1); inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2); and unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions (Level 3). The Company utilizes Level 2 and Level 3 inputs in testing assets for recoverability upon events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable.

The fair value of financial instruments is determined based on quoted market prices, if available, or management’s best estimate. It is management’s belief that the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash equivalents and long-term investments in private equity securities, are reasonable estimates of their related fair values. Cash equivalents are recorded at historical cost which equals fair value based on quoted market prices (Level 1 input). Management evaluates its investments for other-than-temporary impairment at each balance sheet date. When testing long-term investments for recovery of carrying value, the fair value of long-term investments in private equity securities is determined using various valuation techniques and factors, such as market prices of comparable companies (Level 2 input), discounted cash flow models (Level 3 input) and recent capital transactions of the portfolio companies being valued (Level 3 input). If management determines that an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of an investment has occurred, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the investment to its estimated fair value (Level 2 input). The fair value of long-term debt (see Note 7) is determined based on current interest rates available for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Company’s existing debt arrangements (Level 2 and 3 inputs).

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company’s cash equivalents were primarily comprised of investments in several large institutional money market funds that invest primarily in bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government guaranteed repurchase agreements fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. Government guaranteed securities and investment-grade corporate securities that have original maturities of three months or less. There are no restrictions on the withdrawal of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

The Company has restricted cash balances, primarily representing advances from a customer, that are restricted as to use for certain expenditures related to that customer’s contract.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. At January 31, 2013, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents bear both fixed and variable interest rates. Although credit risk is limited, the Company’s receivables are concentrated with its principal customers, which are the various agencies of the U.S. Government and customers engaged in work for the U.S. Government.

Investments

Investments in entities and corporate joint ventures where the Company has a noncontrolling ownership interest representing less than 50% and over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting whereby the Company recognizes its proportionate share of the entities’ net income or loss and does not consolidate the entities’ assets and liabilities. Equity investments in entities over which the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence and whose securities do not have a readily determinable fair value are carried at cost or cost net of other-than-temporary impairments.

Variable Interest Entities

The Company occasionally forms joint ventures and/or enters into arrangements with special purpose limited liability companies for the purpose of bidding and executing on specific projects. The Company analyzes each such arrangement to determine whether it represents a variable interest entity (VIE). If the arrangement is determined to be a VIE, the Company assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE and is consequently required to consolidate the VIE.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Raw material inventory is valued using the average cost or first-in, first-out methods. Work-in-process inventory includes raw material costs plus labor costs, including fringe benefits, and allocable overhead costs. Finished goods inventory consists primarily of purchased finished goods for resale to customers, such as tires and lubricants, in addition to manufactured border, port and mobile security products and baggage scanning equipment. The Company evaluates inventory against historical and planned usage to determine appropriate provisions for obsolete inventory.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Purchases of property, plant and equipment as well as costs associated with major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals and betterments are expensed as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized. Depreciation is recognized using the methods and estimated useful lives as follows:


	Depreciation method	Estimated useful lives (in years)
Equipment	Straight-line or declining-balance	2-10
Building	Straight-line	20-40
Building improvements and leasehold improvements	Straight-line	Shorter of lease term or 25

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for potential impairment whenever there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable and the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows. When the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the asset’s carrying amount to its estimated fair value based on the present value of its estimated future cash flows.

As of January 31, 2013, there were certain properties that were reported as held for sale within the Corporate and Other segment. Two of these properties were sold subsequent to January 31, 2013.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company evaluates goodwill for potential impairment annually at the beginning of the fourth quarter, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process performed at the reporting unit level. The first step consists of estimating the fair values of each of the reporting units based on a market approach and an income approach. Fair value computed using these two methods is determined using a number of factors, including projected future operating results and business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, comparable market data based on industry grouping, and the cost of capital. The estimated fair values are compared with the carrying values of the reporting units. If the fair value is less than the carrying value of a reporting unit, which includes the allocated goodwill, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by determining an implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is the residual fair value derived by deducting the fair value of a reporting unit’s identifiable assets and liabilities from its estimated fair value calculated in the first step. The impairment expense represents the excess of the carrying amount of the reporting units’ goodwill over the implied fair value of the reporting units’ goodwill. The Company faces continued uncertainty in its business environment due to the substantial fiscal and economic challenges facing the U.S. Government, its primary customer. Adverse changes in fiscal and economic conditions, such as the manner in which budget cuts are implemented, including sequestration, and issues related to the nation’s debt ceiling, could result in an impairment of goodwill.

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the method that best reflects how their economic benefits are utilized or, if a pattern of economic benefits cannot be reliably determined, on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with finite lives are assessed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are assessed for impairment at the beginning of the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

The Company classifies indirect costs incurred within or allocated to its U.S. Government customers as overhead (included in cost of revenues) or general and administrative expenses in the same manner as such costs are defined in the Company’s disclosure statements under U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards. Effective in fiscal 2012, one of the Company’s subsidiaries adopted the Company’s more prevalent disclosure statement resulting in certain costs previously classified as general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2011 being classified as cost of revenues in fiscal 2012 on a prospective basis. This change caused a net increase in reported cost of revenues and a net decrease in reported selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2013 and 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011 and prior years; however, total operating costs were not affected by this change. Selling, general and administrative expenses include general and administrative, bid and proposal and internal research and development expenses.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method in accordance with the accounting standard for income taxes. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Under this method, changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in income in the period such changes are enacted.

The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent that it believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent results of operations. If the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount or would no longer be able to realize its deferred income tax assets in the future as currently recorded, the Company would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would decrease or increase the provision for income taxes.

The provision for federal, state, foreign and local income taxes is calculated on income before income taxes based on current tax law and includes the cumulative effect of any changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining deferred tax assets and liabilities. Such provision differs from the amounts currently payable because certain items of income and expense are recognized in different reporting periods for financial reporting purposes than for income tax purposes.

The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not that a tax position will not be sustained upon examination and settlement with various taxing authorities. Liabilities for uncertain tax positions are measured based upon the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in its income tax expense.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes the fair value of all stock-based awards, including stock options, granted to employees and directors in exchange for services as compensation expense over the requisite service period, which is typically the vesting period, net of an estimated forfeiture rate.

Foreign Currency

The financial statements of consolidated international subsidiaries, for which the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and a weighted average exchange rate over the reporting period for revenues, expenses, gains and losses. Translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses are recognized in the statement of income.

Accounting Standards Updates Adopted

During the fiscal years presented, the Company adopted various accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), none of which had a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Accounting Standards Updates Issued But Not Yet Adopted

In February 2013, the FASB issued an update to Comprehensive Income. This update requires the presentation and disclosure of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income in a single note or on the face of the financial statements. This update is effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2013, and will be applied prospectively.

Other accounting standards and updates issued but not effective for the Company until after January 31, 2013, are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Science Applications International Corporation

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

The Company may dispose (or management may commit to plans to dispose) of components of the business, which are reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Planned Separation Transaction

During the year ended January 31, 2013, separation transaction expenses were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31, 2013
	(in millions)
Strategic advisory services	$	18
Investment banking services		3
Legal and accounting services		5
Severance costs		12
Separation transaction expenses in operating income		38
Less: income tax benefit		(15	)
Separation transaction expenses, net of tax	$	23

In connection with the separation transaction, the Company eliminated positions in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 which resulted in severance costs as reflected in the table above.

Operating Cycle

Use of Estimates

Revenue Recognition

The Company evaluates its contracts for multiple elements, and when appropriate, separates the contracts into separate units of accounting for revenue recognition.

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Receivables

Discontinued Operations

Pre-contract Costs

Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Restricted Cash

The Company has restricted cash balances, primarily representing advances from a customer, that are restricted as to use for certain expenditures related to that customer’s contract.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Investments

Variable Interest Entities

Inventories

Property, Plant and Equipment


	Depreciation method	Estimated useful lives (in years)
Equipment	Straight-line or declining-balance	2-10
Building	Straight-line	20-40
Building improvements and leasehold improvements	Straight-line	Shorter of lease term or 25

As of January 31, 2013, there were certain properties that were reported as held for sale within the Corporate and Other segment. Two of these properties were sold subsequent to January 31, 2013.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Income Taxes

Stock-Based Compensation

Foreign Currency

Accounting Standards Updates Adopted

Accounting Standards Updates Issued But Not Yet Adopted

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Note 2—Earnings Per Share (EPS):

The Company is required to allocate a portion of its earnings to its unvested stock awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (participating securities) in calculating EPS using the two-class method.

Unvested stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013 are participating securities requiring application of the two-class method. In fiscal 2013, the Company began issuing unvested stock awards that have forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. These stock awards are not participating securities requiring application of the two-class method but are dilutive common share equivalents subject to the treasury stock method. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income less earnings allocable to participating securities by the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS, except the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased to include the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and other stock-based awards.

A reconciliation of the income used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Basic EPS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported	$	523		$	(15	)	$	547
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(17	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	$	512		$	(15	)	$	530
Net income, as reported	$	525		$	59		$	619
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(20	)
Net income, for computing basic EPS	$	514		$	59		$	599
Diluted EPS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported	$	523		$	(15	)	$	547
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(17	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	$	512		$	(15	)	$	530
Net income, as reported	$	525		$	59		$	619
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(20	)
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$	514		$	59		$	599

A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		333		336		364
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards		—		—		2
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		333		336		366

Basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.54	$	(.04	)	$	1.46
Income from discontinued operations		—		.22			.19
	$	1.54	$	.18		$	1.65
Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.54	$	(.04	)	$	1.45
Income from discontinued operations		—		.22			.19
	$	1.54	$	.18		$	1.64

The following stock-based awards were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Antidilutive stock options excluded		20		21		19
Performance-based stock awards excluded		1		1		1

Science Applications International Corporation

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Note 2—Earnings Per Share (EPS):

A reconciliation of the income used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Basic EPS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported	$	523		$	(15	)	$	547
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(17	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	$	512		$	(15	)	$	530
Net income, as reported	$	525		$	59		$	619
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(20	)
Net income, for computing basic EPS	$	514		$	59		$	599
Diluted EPS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported	$	523		$	(15	)	$	547
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(17	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	$	512		$	(15	)	$	530
Net income, as reported	$	525		$	59		$	619
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(20	)
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$	514		$	59		$	599

A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		333		336		364
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards		—		—		2
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		333		336		366

Basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.54	$	(.04	)	$	1.46
Income from discontinued operations		—		.22			.19
	$	1.54	$	.18		$	1.65
Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.54	$	(.04	)	$	1.45
Income from discontinued operations		—		.22			.19
	$	1.54	$	.18		$	1.64

The following stock-based awards were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Antidilutive stock options excluded		20		21		19
Performance-based stock awards excluded		1		1		1

Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

Note 3—Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Receivables, net:
Billed and billable receivables	$	1,272		$	1,558
Unbillable receivables, including contract retentions		626			612
Less allowance for doubtful accounts		(9	)		(6	)
	$	1,889		$	2,164
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets:
Inventories	$	192		$	168
Prepaid expenses		51			59
Restricted cash		51			43
Deferred income taxes		18			82
Assets held for sale		30			9
Prepaid income taxes and tax refunds receivable		94			41
Other		18			37
	$	454		$	439
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Computers and other equipment	$	314		$	305
Buildings and improvements		148			181
Leasehold improvements		212			194
Office furniture and fixtures		57			54
Land		27			32
Construction in progress		2			6
		760			772
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(442	)		(424	)
	$	318		$	348
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	435		$	485
Accrued liabilities *		682			1,265
Collections in excess of revenues on uncompleted contracts and deferred revenue		132			211
	$	1,249		$	1,961
Accrued payroll and employee benefits:
Salaries, bonuses and amounts withheld from employees’ compensation	$	298		$	251
Accrued vacation		236			246
Accrued contributions to employee benefit plans		8			7
	$	542		$	504
Other long-term liabilities:
Accrued pension liabilities	$	8		$	29
Deferred compensation		44			41
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions		24			29
Deferred tax liabilities		25			—
Other		67			63
	$	168		$	162

*	Includes the $500 million CityTime obligation as of January 31, 2012 described in Note 17.

Science Applications International Corporation

Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

Note 3—Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Receivables, net:
Billed and billable receivables	$	1,272		$	1,558
Unbillable receivables, including contract retentions		626			612
Less allowance for doubtful accounts		(9	)		(6	)
	$	1,889		$	2,164
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets:
Inventories	$	192		$	168
Prepaid expenses		51			59
Restricted cash		51			43
Deferred income taxes		18			82
Assets held for sale		30			9
Prepaid income taxes and tax refunds receivable		94			41
Other		18			37
	$	454		$	439
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Computers and other equipment	$	314		$	305
Buildings and improvements		148			181
Leasehold improvements		212			194
Office furniture and fixtures		57			54
Land		27			32
Construction in progress		2			6
		760			772
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(442	)		(424	)
	$	318		$	348
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	435		$	485
Accrued liabilities *		682			1,265
Collections in excess of revenues on uncompleted contracts and deferred revenue		132			211
	$	1,249		$	1,961
Accrued payroll and employee benefits:
Salaries, bonuses and amounts withheld from employees’ compensation	$	298		$	251
Accrued vacation		236			246
Accrued contributions to employee benefit plans		8			7
	$	542		$	504
Other long-term liabilities:
Accrued pension liabilities	$	8		$	29
Deferred compensation		44			41
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions		24			29
Deferred tax liabilities		25			—
Other		67			63
	$	168		$	162

*	Includes the $500 million CityTime obligation as of January 31, 2012 described in Note 17.

Acquisitions

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Acquisitions

Note 4—Acquisitions:

The Company acquires businesses as part of its growth strategy to provide new or enhance existing capabilities and offerings to customers. The Company completed acquisitions during each of the years presented, which individually and in the aggregate were not considered significant business combinations in the year acquired.

Acquisition information for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	($ in millions)
Number of acquisitions		1		2		3
Cash consideration (paid and accrued)	$	505	$	223	$	389

Purchase price (preliminary or final) allocations for the years presented were as follows ($ in millions):


	2013		2012		2011
Purchase price allocations:
Goodwill:
Tax deductible goodwill	$	—	$	30	$	16
Non-tax deductible goodwill		395		135		223
Identifiable intangible assets:
Customer relationships (finite-lived)	$	62	$	28	$	9
Software and technology (finite-lived)		—		—		110
Other (finite-lived)		10		1		—
In-process research and development (indefinite-lived)		—		—		27
Weighted average lives of finite-lived intangibles:
Customer relationships		5 years		5 years		2 years
Software and technology		—		—		8 years
Other		1 year		3 years		—
All finite-lived intangible assets		4 years		5 years		7 years

In August 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of maxIT Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (maxIT), a provider of clinical, business and information technology services primarily to commercial hospital groups and other medical delivery organizations. This acquisition expands the Company’s commercial consulting practice in electronic health record (EHR) implementation and optimization and strengthens the Company’s capabilities to provide these services to its federal healthcare customers as those customers migrate to commercial off-the-shelf EHR applications. This acquisition was in the Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment.

The preliminary estimated fair values of the maxIT assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition were as follows (in millions):


Cash	$	9
Receivables		50
Other assets		24
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued payroll and employee benefits		(21	)
Deferred tax liabilities, net		(24	)
Total identifiable net assets acquired		38
Goodwill		395
Intangible assets		72
Total preliminary purchase price (including accrued acquisition payments of $13 million)	$	505

The estimated fair values of the maxIT assets acquired and liabilities assumed are preliminary for income tax related matters and certain liabilities assumed. From the date of acquisition of maxIT through January 31, 2013, the Company recognized revenues of $133 million and operating income of $4 million related to this acquisition.

The Company’s acquisitions in fiscal 2012 included Vitalize Consulting Solutions, Inc. and Patrick Energy Services, Inc. in the Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment. Vitalize Consulting Solutions, Inc. is a provider of clinical, business and information technology services for healthcare enterprises. This acquisition expanded the Company’s capabilities in both federal and commercial markets to help customers better address EHR implementation and optimization demand. Patrick Energy Services, Inc. is a provider of performance-based transmission and distribution power system solutions. This acquisition enhanced the Company’s energy and smart grid services portfolio by adding additional transmission and distribution engineering services to its existing capabilities.

The most notable acquisitions in fiscal 2011 included Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. in the Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions segment and Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. in the Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment. Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. is a provider of cybersecurity and management services solutions. This acquisition enhanced the Company’s cybersecurity offerings and positioned the Company to bring to market deep packet inspection solutions for high speed networks, enabling the Company to better meet emerging customer requirements. Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. is a provider of threat detection products and services. This acquisition enhanced the Company’s homeland security solutions portfolio by adding U.S. Transportation Security Administration certified explosive detection systems for checked baggage screening to the Company’s passenger and cargo inspection systems product offerings.

Science Applications International Corporation

Acquisitions

Note 4—Acquisitions:

Acquisition information for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	($ in millions)
Number of acquisitions		1		2		3
Cash consideration (paid and accrued)	$	505	$	223	$	389

Purchase price (preliminary or final) allocations for the years presented were as follows ($ in millions):


	2013		2012		2011
Purchase price allocations:
Goodwill:
Tax deductible goodwill	$	—	$	30	$	16
Non-tax deductible goodwill		395		135		223
Identifiable intangible assets:
Customer relationships (finite-lived)	$	62	$	28	$	9
Software and technology (finite-lived)		—		—		110
Other (finite-lived)		10		1		—
In-process research and development (indefinite-lived)		—		—		27
Weighted average lives of finite-lived intangibles:
Customer relationships		5 years		5 years		2 years
Software and technology		—		—		8 years
Other		1 year		3 years		—
All finite-lived intangible assets		4 years		5 years		7 years

The preliminary estimated fair values of the maxIT assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition were as follows (in millions):


Cash	$	9
Receivables		50
Other assets		24
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued payroll and employee benefits		(21	)
Deferred tax liabilities, net		(24	)
Total identifiable net assets acquired		38
Goodwill		395
Intangible assets		72
Total preliminary purchase price (including accrued acquisition payments of $13 million)	$	505

- Definition

The entire disclosure for a business combination (or series of individually immaterial business combinations) completed during the period, including background, timing, and recognized assets and liabilities. The disclosure may include leverage buyout transactions (as applicable).

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1497-128463

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1490-128463

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1392-128463

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7488404&loc=d3e7008-128479

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1486-128463

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7488404&loc=d3e6927-128479

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4845-128472

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1500-128463

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 7
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1524-128463

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7488404&loc=d3e7000-128479

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4922-128472

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4934-128472

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4926-128472

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7488404&loc=d3e6996-128479

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1383-128463

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 88-16
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 17: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph F4
-Subparagraph e
-Appendix F

Reference 18: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141
-Paragraph 51, 52
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 19: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 67-73
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Note 5—Goodwill and Intangible Assets:

As discussed in Note 15 — Business Segment Information, the Company has the following reportable segments:

Defense Solutions (DS); Health, Energy and Civil Solutions (HECS); and Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions (ICS). Corporate reorganizations occurred in fiscal 2013 resulting in transfers of certain operations between the Company’s reportable segments as well as a change in the aggregation of business units in the ICS reportable segment.

The balance and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were as follows:


	DS		HECS			ICS		Total
	(in millions)
Balance at January 31, 2011	$	405	$	608		$	625	$	1,638
Acquisitions		—		165			—		165
Adjustments		5		(14	)		6		(3	)
Balance at January 31, 2012		410		759			631		1,800
Acquisitions		—		395			—		395
Adjustments		—		(10	)		10		—
Balance at January 31, 2013	$	410	$	1,144		$	641	$	2,195

The carrying value of goodwill by segment at January 31, 2011 has been recast to give effect to the change in reportable segments and for discontinued operations ($26 million for discontinued operations occurring in fiscal 2013).

Goodwill adjustments in fiscal 2013 and 2012 resulted from the finalization of purchase price allocations related to prior year acquisitions and the transfer of certain operations between reportable segments. There were no goodwill impairments during fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Intangible assets, including those arising from preliminary estimates of assets acquired relating to acquisitions, consisted of the following:


	January 31
	2013							2012
	Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value		Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value
	(in millions)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	175	$	(73	)	$	102	$	120	$	(62	)	$	58
Software and technology		127		(57	)		70		148		(48	)		100
Other		2		(1	)		1		2		(1	)		1
Total finite-lived intangible assets		304		(131	)		173		270		(111	)		159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
In-process research and development		13		—			13		13		—			13
Trade names		4		—			4		4		—			4
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets		17		—			17		17		—			17
Total intangible assets	$	321	$	(131	)	$	190	$	287	$	(111	)	$	176

Finite-lived intangible assets with a gross carrying value of $25 million and $37 million became fully amortized in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, and are no longer reflected in the gross carrying value after becoming fully amortized. Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $45 million, $45 million and $40 million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

During fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company determined that certain intangible assets consisting of software and technology and customer relationships, mainly associated with the acquisitions of Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. in fiscal 2011 and Science, Engineering and Technology Associates Corporation in fiscal 2010, were not recoverable due to lower projected revenue levels from the associated products and customers. As a result, the Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions reportable segment recognized impairment losses within selling, general and administrative expenses of $13 million and $19 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, to reduce the carrying amount of these intangible assets to their estimated fair values. There were no impairments of intangible assets for fiscal 2011. Fair value was estimated using the income approach based on management’s forecast of future cash flows to be derived from the assets’ use (Level 3 under the accounting standard for fair value measurement).

The estimated annual amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets as of January 31, 2013 was as follows:


Year Ending January 31
	(in millions)
2014	$	44
2015		35
2016		32
2017		27
2018		18
2019 and thereafter		17
	$	173

Actual amortization expense in future periods could differ from these estimates as a result of future acquisitions, divestitures, impairments, the outcome and timing of completion of in-process research and development projects (the assets of which will become amortizable upon completion and placement into service, or will be impaired if abandoned), adjustments to preliminary valuations of intangible assets and other factors.

Science Applications International Corporation

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Note 5—Goodwill and Intangible Assets:

As discussed in Note 15 — Business Segment Information, the Company has the following reportable segments:

The balance and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were as follows:


	DS		HECS			ICS		Total
	(in millions)
Balance at January 31, 2011	$	405	$	608		$	625	$	1,638
Acquisitions		—		165			—		165
Adjustments		5		(14	)		6		(3	)
Balance at January 31, 2012		410		759			631		1,800
Acquisitions		—		395			—		395
Adjustments		—		(10	)		10		—
Balance at January 31, 2013	$	410	$	1,144		$	641	$	2,195

Intangible assets, including those arising from preliminary estimates of assets acquired relating to acquisitions, consisted of the following:


	January 31
	2013							2012
	Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value		Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value
	(in millions)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	175	$	(73	)	$	102	$	120	$	(62	)	$	58
Software and technology		127		(57	)		70		148		(48	)		100
Other		2		(1	)		1		2		(1	)		1
Total finite-lived intangible assets		304		(131	)		173		270		(111	)		159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
In-process research and development		13		—			13		13		—			13
Trade names		4		—			4		4		—			4
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets		17		—			17		17		—			17
Total intangible assets	$	321	$	(131	)	$	190	$	287	$	(111	)	$	176

The estimated annual amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets as of January 31, 2013 was as follows:


Year Ending January 31
	(in millions)
2014	$	44
2015		35
2016		32
2017		27
2018		18
2019 and thereafter		17
	$	173

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the aggregate amount of goodwill and a description of intangible assets, which may include (a) for amortizable intangible assets (also referred to as finite-lived intangible assets), the carrying amount, the amount of any significant residual value, and the weighted-average amortization period, (b) for intangible assets not subject to amortization (also referred to as indefinite-lived intangible assets), the carrying amount, and (c) the amount of research and development assets acquired and written off in the period, including the line item in the income statement in which the amounts written off are aggregated, if not readily apparent from the income statement. Also discloses (a) for amortizable intangibles assets in total and by major class, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization, the total amortization expense for the period, and the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years, (b) for intangible assets not subject to amortization the carrying amount in total and by major class, and (c) for goodwill, in total and for each reportable segment, the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the period (including the aggregate amount of goodwill acquired, the aggregate amount of impairment losses recognized, and the amount of goodwill included in the gain (loss) on disposal of a reporting unit). If any part of goodwill has not been allocated to a reportable segment, discloses the unallocated amount and the reasons for not allocating. For each impairment loss recognized related to an intangible asset (excluding goodwill), discloses: (a) a description of the impaired intangible asset and the facts and circumstances leading to the impairment, (b) the amount of the impairment loss and the method for determining fair value, (c) the caption in the income statement or the statement of activities in which the impairment loss is aggregated, and (d) the segment in which the impaired intangible asset is reported. For each goodwill impairment loss recognized, discloses: (a) a description of the facts and circumstances leading to the impairment, (b) the amount of the impairment loss and the method of determining the fair value of the associated reporting unit, and (c) if a recognized impairment loss is an estimate not finalized and the reasons why the estimate is not final. May also disclose the nature and amount of any significant adjustments made to a previous estimate of an impairment loss.

+ References + Details

Revolving Credit Facility	12 Months Ended
Revolving Credit Facility	Jan. 31, 2013
Revolving Credit Facility	Note 6—Revolving Credit Facility: In fiscal 2012, SAIC amended and restated its revolving credit facility. The amended and restated revolving credit facility executed by SAIC and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Science Applications provides for up to $750 million in unsecured borrowing capacity at interest rates determined, at SAIC’s option, based on either LIBOR plus a margin or a defined base rate. During fiscal 2013, the Company extended the maturity date of the credit facility for one additional year, to March 2016, as provided for in the terms of the credit facility. As of January 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility. The revolving credit facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, as well as certain affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenants contained in the credit facility require that, for a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, the Company maintains a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this credit facility, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants as of January 31, 2013. A failure by the Company to meet these financial covenants in the future would reduce and could eliminate the Company’s borrowing capacity under the credit facility. Other covenants restrict certain of the Company’s activities, including among other things, its ability to create liens, dispose of certain assets and merge or consolidate with other entities. The credit facility also contains certain customary events of default, including, among others, defaults based on certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment, cross-defaults to other debt, breach of specified covenants, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) events, material monetary judgments, change of control events and the material inaccuracy of the Company’s representations and warranties.
Science Applications International Corporation
Revolving Credit Facility	Note 6—Revolving Credit Facility: In fiscal 2012, SAIC amended and restated its revolving credit facility. The amended and restated revolving credit facility executed by SAIC and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Science Applications provides for up to $750 million in unsecured borrowing capacity at interest rates determined, at SAIC’s option, based on either LIBOR plus a margin or a defined base rate. During fiscal 2013, the Company extended the maturity date of the credit facility for one additional year, to March 2016, as provided for in the terms of the credit facility. As of January 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility. The revolving credit facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, as well as certain affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenants contained in the credit facility require that, for a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, the Company maintains a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this credit facility, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants as of January 31, 2013. A failure by the Company to meet these financial covenants in the future would reduce and could eliminate the Company’s borrowing capacity under the credit facility. Other covenants restrict certain of the Company’s activities, including among other things, its ability to create liens, dispose of certain assets and merge or consolidate with other entities. The credit facility also contains certain customary events of default, including, among others, defaults based on certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment, cross-defaults to other debt, breach of specified covenants, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) events, material monetary judgments, change of control events and the material inaccuracy of the Company’s representations and warranties.

Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

Note 7—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt:

The Company’s notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following for the years presented:


					January 31
	Stated interest rate		Effective interest rate		2013		2012
					($ in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45%		4.53%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95%		6.03%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which matured in July 2012		6.25%		6.50%		—		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13%		7.43%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50%		5.78%		297		296
Other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2017		0%-2.5%		Various		4		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt						1,298		1,852
Less current portion						2		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion					$	1,296	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt					$	1,390	$	2,011

The Company paid $550 million to settle the 6.25% notes at maturity in July 2012.

Interest is payable on the Company’s senior unsecured notes on a semi-annual basis with principal payments due on maturity. The note discounts, issuance costs and the loss on the settlement of related treasury lock contracts are amortized to interest expense, which results in an effective interest rate that is higher than the stated interest rate of the notes. The senior unsecured notes contain customary restrictive covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the Company’s ability to create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of January 31, 2013.

Maturities of notes payable and long-term debt are as follows:


Year Ending January 31	Total
	(in millions)
2014	$	2
2015		2
2016		1
2017		1
2018		—
2019 and thereafter		1,300
Total principal payments		1,306
Less unamortized discount		8
	$	1,298

Science Applications International Corporation

Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

Note 7—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt:

The Company’s notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following for the years presented:


					January 31
	Stated interest rate		Effective interest rate		2013		2012
					($ in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45%		4.53%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95%		6.03%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which matured in July 2012		6.25%		6.50%		—		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13%		7.43%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50%		5.78%		297		296
Other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2017		0%-2.5%		Various		4		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt						1,298		1,852
Less current portion						2		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion					$	1,296	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt					$	1,390	$	2,011

The Company paid $550 million to settle the 6.25% notes at maturity in July 2012.

Maturities of notes payable and long-term debt are as follows:


Year Ending January 31	Total
	(in millions)
2014	$	2
2015		2
2016		1
2017		1
2018		—
2019 and thereafter		1,300
Total principal payments		1,306
Less unamortized discount		8
	$	1,298

Related Party Transactions	12 Months Ended
Related Party Transactions	Jan. 31, 2013
Related Party Transactions	Note 8—Related Party Transactions: Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of SAIC under its $450 million 4.45% notes and $300 million 5.95% notes. These notes have been reflected as debt of Science Applications in these consolidated financial statements. Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed any borrowings under SAIC’s amended and restated revolving credit facility maturing in fiscal 2017. SAIC has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of Science Applications under its $300 million 5.5% notes and $250 million 7.13% notes. SAIC and Science Applications have a related party note in connection with a loan of cash between the entities, which is adjusted to reflect issuances of stock by SAIC to employees of Science Applications and its subsidiaries and Science Applications’ payment of certain obligations on behalf of SAIC. The related party note bears interest based on LIBOR plus a market-based premium. Portions of the related party note may be repaid at any time prior to its maturity date in November 2013. This maturity date will be automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless either SAIC or Science Applications provides prior notice to the other party.
Science Applications International Corporation
Related Party Transactions	Note 8—Related Party Transactions: Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of SAIC under its $450 million 4.45% notes and $300 million 5.95% notes. These notes have been reflected as debt of Science Applications in these consolidated financial statements. Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed any borrowings under SAIC’s amended and restated revolving credit facility maturing in fiscal 2017. SAIC has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of Science Applications under its $300 million 5.5% notes and $250 million 7.13% notes. SAIC and Science Applications have a related party note in connection with a loan of cash between the entities, which is adjusted to reflect issuances of stock by SAIC to employees of Science Applications and its subsidiaries and Science Applications’ payment of certain obligations on behalf of SAIC. The related party note bears interest based on LIBOR plus a market-based premium. Portions of the related party note may be repaid at any time prior to its maturity date in November 2013. This maturity date will be automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless either SAIC or Science Applications provides prior notice to the other party.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for related party transactions. Examples of related party transactions include transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners; and (d) affiliates.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39603-107864

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39622-107864

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39549-107864

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39678-107864

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(k))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39691-107864

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph b
-Article 3A

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 08
-Paragraph k
-Article 4

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 57
-Paragraph 1-4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Retirement Plans

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Retirement Plans

Note 9—Retirement Plans:

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors several defined contribution plans, including the SAIC Retirement Plan (SRP) which is both a 401(k) plan and an employee stock ownership plan, in which most employees are eligible to participate. These plans allow eligible participants to contribute a portion of their income through payroll deductions and the Company may also make discretionary contributions. Company contributions expensed for defined contribution plans were $145 million, $150 million and $157 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plans

The Company maintains two deferred compensation plans, the Keystaff Deferral Plan (KDP) and the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan (KESDP), for the benefit of certain management or highly compensated employees or directors and allows eligible participants to elect to defer all or a portion of their annual bonus, sign-on bonus or certain other bonuses. Directors may also elect to defer their director fees. The Company makes no contributions to the KDP but maintains participant accounts for deferred amounts and interest earned. Interest is accrued based on the Moody’s Seasoned Corporate Bond Rate (3.1% to 4.1% during fiscal 2013). Deferred balances are generally paid upon retirement or termination. Under the KESDP, eligible participants may elect to defer in share units all or a portion of their bonus awards granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (see Note 10) and prior plans. The Company makes no contributions to the accounts of KESDP participants. Benefits from the KESDP are payable in shares of SAIC’s stock that may be held in a trust for the purpose of funding benefit payments to KESDP participants. Deferred balances will generally be paid upon retirement or termination.

Beginning in fiscal 2012, the Company sponsored a 401(k) Excess Deferral Plan (Excess Plan) for the benefit of certain management or highly compensated employees that allows participants to elect to defer up to 20% of their eligible salary once the participant has met the contribution limit imposed on the SAIC Retirement Plan. The Company makes matching contributions to participants who have received a reduced Company contribution in the SAIC Retirement Plan due to the participant’s deferral of salary into the Excess Plan.

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom for plan participants that primarily performed services on an expired customer contract. While benefits are no longer accruing under the plan, the Company has continuing defined benefit pension obligations with respect to certain plan participants. In fiscal 2012, the Company sold certain components of its business, including the component of its business that contained this pension and employed the pension plan participants. The Company has classified the operating results of this business component, including pension expense through the date of sale, as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Pursuant to the definitive sale agreement, the Company retained the assets and obligations of this defined benefit pension plan. As a result of retaining the pension obligation, the remaining components of ongoing pension expense, primarily interest costs and assumed return on plan assets subsequent to the sale, are recorded in continuing operations.

In fiscal 2013, certain plan participants in the Company’s defined benefit pension plan, who previously transferred their employment to a successor contractor upon the expiration of the customer contract, elected to transfer, and the Company transferred, $46 million of pension plan assets to that successor contractor’s plan and settled $63 million of related pension plan obligations. As a result of the transfer, the Company recorded an immaterial settlement gain in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2013.

In the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever the plan assets and liabilities are remeasured, the Company evaluates and recognizes, when appropriate, the net actuarial gains or losses in excess of the 10 percent of the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the plan’s projected benefit obligation (which is referred to as the “corridor”).

Funded Status. The following tables set forth the funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets for this plan.


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	149		$	131
Interest cost		4			7
Actuarial loss		3			15
Benefits paid		(2	)		(2	)
Prior service costs		—			1
Settlements		(63	)		—
Foreign exchange rate changes		3			(3	)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	$	94		$	149
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	120		$	111
Actual return on plan assets		7			6
Settlements		(46	)		—
Company contributions		5			8
Benefits paid		(2	)		(2	)
Foreign exchange rate changes		2			(3	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	86		$	120
Funded status at end of year	$	(8	)	$	(29	)


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	94		$	149
Amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
Accrued pension liability (other long-term liabilities)	$	(8	)	$	(29	)
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
Net actuarial (gain) loss (pretax)	$	(1	)	$	13

The components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for this plan were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Service cost	$	—		$	—		$	1
Interest cost		4			7			7
Expected return on plan assets		(5	)		(5	)		(7	)
Prior service costs		—			1			—
Contractual termination benefits		—			—			1
	$	(1	)	$	3		$	2

Actuarial Assumptions. The weighted-average assumptions used in determining the benefit obligations and the net periodic benefit cost of pension were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the plan’s measurement date:
Discount rate		4.7	%		4.4	%
Rate of compensation increase		0.0			3.8


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate		4.4	%		5.6	%		5.5	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets		4.2			4.6			6.8
Rate of compensation increase		0.0			4.4			4.3

The overall expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption represents the expected average earnings on funds invested or to be invested by the plan. This return is based on a variety of factors including long-term historical market returns for each asset class in the plan and review of peer data. A weighting of these asset class returns, based on the actual allocation of the asset classes in the plan as of the beginning of the fiscal year, was performed to determine an overall expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.

Plan Assets. The following tables set forth the fair value of plan assets and related level of inputs used to determine the fair value of plan assets in each asset class as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements (see Note 1):


January 31, 2013	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1 inputs)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2 inputs)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 inputs)		Total
	(in millions)
Asset class:
International equity securities	$	—	$	37	$	—	$	37
United Kingdom government bonds		—		17		—		17
Corporate bonds		—		31		—		31
Cash		1		—		—		1
	$	1	$	85	$	—	$	86


January 31, 2012	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1 inputs)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2 inputs)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 inputs)		Total
	(in millions)
Asset class:
International equity securities	$	—	$	44	$	—	$	44
United Kingdom government bonds		—		15		—		15
Corporate bonds		—		21		—		21
Cash		40		—		—		40
	$	40	$	80	$	—	$	120

The plan’s assets consist of investments in pooled funds that contain investments with values based on quoted market prices, but for which the pools are not valued on a daily quoted market basis (Level 2 inputs).

The overall investment strategy for pension plan assets is to utilize a total return investment approach in which a mix of equity securities and fixed-income securities are used to produce a sufficient level of diversification and investment return over the long term for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through consideration of plan demographics, plan liabilities, plan funded status and overall corporate financial condition. Consideration is also given to industry practices, long-term historical and prospective capital market returns, volatility, correlations among asset classes and relationships between the plan assets and liabilities. The assets are invested in liquid investments to satisfy benefit obligations as they become due. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity securities and fixed-income securities. As of January 31, 2013, the Company’s target asset allocation was approximately 40% and 60% of total plan assets for equity securities and fixed-income securities, respectively. However, a large portion of plan assets were held as cash at January 31, 2012 in anticipation of a transfer of plan assets and obligations to a successor contractor.

Cash Flows. In fiscal 2014, the Company expects to contribute approximately $5 million to the defined benefit pension plan. The estimated annual benefit payments are expected to be $2 million for each of the years in fiscal 2014 to 2018. Total estimated benefit payments for fiscal 2019 through 2023 are expected to be $13 million.

Other

The Company also sponsors a defined benefit pension plan for employees working on one U.S. Government contract. As part of the contractual agreement, the customer reimburses the Company for contributions made to the plan that are allowable under government contract cost accounting requirements. If the Company were to cease being the contractor as a result of a recompetition process, this defined benefit pension plan and related plan assets and liabilities would transfer to the new contractor. If the contract expires or is terminated with no transfer of the plan to a successor contractor, any amount by which plan liabilities exceed plan assets, as of that date, will be reimbursed by the U.S. Government customer. Since the Company is not responsible for the current or future funded status of this plan, no assets or liabilities arising from its funded status are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and no amounts associated with this plan are included in the defined benefit plan disclosures above.

Science Applications International Corporation

Retirement Plans

Note 9—Retirement Plans:

Defined Contribution Plans

Deferred Compensation Plans

Defined Benefit Plans

Funded Status. The following tables set forth the funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets for this plan.


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	149		$	131
Interest cost		4			7
Actuarial loss		3			15
Benefits paid		(2	)		(2	)
Prior service costs		—			1
Settlements		(63	)		—
Foreign exchange rate changes		3			(3	)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	$	94		$	149
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	120		$	111
Actual return on plan assets		7			6
Settlements		(46	)		—
Company contributions		5			8
Benefits paid		(2	)		(2	)
Foreign exchange rate changes		2			(3	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	86		$	120
Funded status at end of year	$	(8	)	$	(29	)


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	94		$	149
Amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
Accrued pension liability (other long-term liabilities)	$	(8	)	$	(29	)
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
Net actuarial (gain) loss (pretax)	$	(1	)	$	13

The components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for this plan were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Service cost	$	—		$	—		$	1
Interest cost		4			7			7
Expected return on plan assets		(5	)		(5	)		(7	)
Prior service costs		—			1			—
Contractual termination benefits		—			—			1
	$	(1	)	$	3		$	2

Actuarial Assumptions. The weighted-average assumptions used in determining the benefit obligations and the net periodic benefit cost of pension were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the plan’s measurement date:
Discount rate		4.7	%		4.4	%
Rate of compensation increase		0.0			3.8


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate		4.4	%		5.6	%		5.5	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets		4.2			4.6			6.8
Rate of compensation increase		0.0			4.4			4.3


January 31, 2013	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1 inputs)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2 inputs)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 inputs)		Total
	(in millions)
Asset class:
International equity securities	$	—	$	37	$	—	$	37
United Kingdom government bonds		—		17		—		17
Corporate bonds		—		31		—		31
Cash		1		—		—		1
	$	1	$	85	$	—	$	86


January 31, 2012	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1 inputs)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2 inputs)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 inputs)		Total
	(in millions)
Asset class:
International equity securities	$	—	$	44	$	—	$	44
United Kingdom government bonds		—		15		—		15
Corporate bonds		—		21		—		21
Cash		40		—		—		40
	$	40	$	80	$	—	$	120

Other

- Definition

The entire disclosure for pension and other postretirement benefits.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2235017

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Implementation Guide (Q and A)
-Number FAS88
-Paragraph 63
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5
-Subparagraph b
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 106
-Paragraph 518
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5
-Subparagraph a
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 03-2
-Paragraph 8
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 87
-Paragraph 264
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5
-Subparagraph q
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5
-Subparagraph h
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 8
-Subparagraph m
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5, 6, 7, 8
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 158
-Paragraph 7, 21, 22
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Staff Position (FSP)
-Number FAS106-2
-Paragraph 20, 21, 22
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
-Number 30
-Paragraph 26
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Stock-Based Compensation

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Stock-Based Compensation

Note 10—Stock-Based Compensation:

Plan Summaries. At January 31, 2013, the Company had stock-based compensation awards outstanding under the following plans: the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the Management Stock Compensation Plan, the Stock Compensation Plan and the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). SAIC issues new shares upon the issuance of stock awards or exercise of stock options under these plans.

The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan provides the Company’s and its affiliates’ employees, directors and consultants the opportunity to receive various types of stock-based compensation and cash awards. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has issued stock options, vested stock awards, restricted stock awards including restricted stock units, performance-based awards and cash awards under this plan. The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan provides that in the event of the Company’s merger with or into another corporation, a sale of substantially all of its assets or the transfer of more than 50% of SAIC’s outstanding shares by tender offer or similar transaction, the successor entity may assume or substitute all outstanding awards. If the successor entity does not assume or substitute all outstanding awards, the vesting of all awards will accelerate and any repurchase rights on awards will terminate. If a successor entity assumes or substitutes all awards and a participant is involuntarily terminated by the successor entity for any reason other than death, disability or cause within 18 months following the change of control, all outstanding awards of the terminated participant will immediately vest and be exercisable for a period of six months following termination. In the event of a change of control, the vesting of all awards held by non-employee directors of the Company will accelerate. Stock awards granted under the plan generally vest or become exercisable 20%, 20%, 20%, and 40% after one, two, three and four years, respectively. As of January 31, 2013, 18 million shares of SAIC’s stock were reserved for future issuance under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.

The Company has a Management Stock Compensation Plan and a Stock Compensation Plan, together referred to as the Stock Compensation Plans. The board of directors may at any time amend or terminate the Stock Compensation Plans. The Stock Compensation Plans provide for awards in share units to eligible employees. Benefits from these plans are payable in shares of SAIC’s stock that are held in a trust for the purpose of funding benefit payments to the plans’ participants. The fair value of the awards granted under the Stock Compensation Plans, which are vesting share unit awards, is based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant. Compensation expense is measured at grant date and generally recognized over the vesting period of four or seven years depending upon the initial date of grant. For awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, participants’ interests in these share units vest on a seven year schedule at the rate of one-third at the end of each of the fifth, sixth and seventh years following the date of the award. Awards granted on or after January 1, 2006 vest 100% after four years following the date of the award. Upon a change in control of the Company (as defined by the Stock Compensation Plans), participant accounts will become fully vested and shares of SAIC stock held in the accounts will be immediately distributed. The Stock Compensation Plans do not provide for a maximum number of shares available for future issuance.

The Company has an ESPP which allows eligible employees to purchase shares of SAIC’s stock at a discount of up to 15% of the fair market value on the date of purchase. During the three years ended January 31, 2013, the discount was 5% of the fair market value on the date of purchase thereby resulting in the ESPP being non-compensatory. As of January 31, 2013, 39 million shares of SAIC’s stock were authorized and reserved for future issuance under the ESPP.

Stock-Based Compensation and Related Tax Benefits Recognized. Stock-based compensation and related tax benefits recognized under all plans were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
	(in millions)
Stock-based compensation expense:
Stock options	$	13	$	17		$	19
Vesting stock awards		69		70			74
Vested stock awards		—		1			1
Performance-based stock awards		2		(5	)		5
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations	$	84	$	83		$	99
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in discontinued operations	$	—	$	2		$	3
Tax benefits recognized from stock-based compensation	$	33	$	33		$	40
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3		$	4

Stock Options. Stock options may be granted with exercise prices no less than the fair value of SAIC’s common stock on the date of grant and for terms not greater than ten years. Prior to January 31, 2011, stock options granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan have a term of five years and a vesting period of four years, except for stock options granted to the Company’s outside directors, which have a vesting period of one year. Subsequent to January 31, 2011, stock options granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan have a term of seven years. Stock options were granted with exercise prices equal to fair value on the date of grant.

The fair value of the Company’s stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The fair value of the Company’s stock option awards is generally expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of four years, except for stock options granted to the Company’s outside directors, which is recognized over the vesting period of one year. The expected term of all awards granted is derived from the Company’s historical experience except for awards granted to the Company’s outside directors, for which the expected term of awards granted is derived utilizing the “simplified” method presented in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Nos. 107 and 110, “Share-Based Payment”. Expected volatility is based on an average of the historical volatility of SAIC’s stock and the implied volatility from traded options on SAIC’s stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a maturity equal to the expected term of the stock option on the date of grant. The Company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures.

The weighted average grant-date fair value and assumptions used to determine fair value of stock options granted for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	1.81		$	4.21		$	3.96
Expected term (in years)		5.0			4.9			3.8
Expected volatility		24.5	%		23.4	%		25.1	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%		2.2	%		2.1	%
Dividend yield		3.7	%		0	%		0	%

Stock option activity for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Shares of stock under stock options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic value
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2010		31.6			16.26		2.0		66
Options granted		5.3			17.43
Options forfeited or expired		(2.8	)		16.14
Options exercised		(9.1	)		14.08				36
Outstanding at January 31, 2011		25.0			17.31		2.1		11
Options granted		3.9			16.92
Options forfeited or expired		(3.6	)		16.73
Options exercised		(4.5	)		14.69				8
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		20.8			17.90		2.5		—
Options granted		5.0			13.20
Options forfeited or expired		(6.2	)		17.54
Options exercised		—			—				—
Outstanding at January 31, 2013		19.6			16.81		3.0		—
Vested and expected to vest in the future as of January 31, 2013		9.0			18.30		1.2		—

The following table summarizes activity related to exercises of stock options for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Cash received from exercises of stock options	$	—	$	1	$	6
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options		—		14		41
Tax benefits realized from exercises of stock options		—		4		17

Stock options outstanding as of January 31, 2013 were as follows:


Range of exercise prices	Stock options outstanding		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Stock options exercisable		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term
	(in millions)				(in years)		(in millions)				(in years)
$12.00 to $17.00		7.7	$	14.60		5.8		0.7	$	16.88		5.1
$17.01 to $18.00		3.8		17.42		2.2		1.6		17.43		2.2
$18.01 to $19.00		8.0		18.59		0.7		6.5		18.63		0.5
$19.01 to $21.00		0.1		20.12		0.6		0.2		20.12		0.6
		19.6		16.81		3.0		9.0		18.30		1.2

The aggregate intrinsic value for options exercisable at January 31, 2013 was $0 million.

As of January 31, 2013, there was $15 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Vesting Stock Awards. Compensation expense is measured at the grant date fair value and generally recognized over the vesting period of four years, or seven years for certain stock awards granted under the Stock Compensation Plans.

Vesting stock award activity for the year ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Shares of stock under stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Unvested at January 31, 2012		12.0		$	17.50
Awards granted		6.7			13.12
Awards forfeited		(1.4	)		15.71
Awards vested		(4.9	)		17.82
Unvested at January 31, 2013		12.4			15.20

As of January 31, 2013, there was $98 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to vesting stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years. The fair value of vesting stock awards that vested in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $66 million, $67 million and $64 million, respectively.

Performance-Based Stock Awards. The Company grants performance-based stock awards to certain officers and key employees of the Company under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These awards vest and the stock is issued at the end of a three-year period based upon the achievement of specific performance criteria, with the number of shares ultimately awarded, if any, ranging up to 150% of the specified target awards. If performance is below the threshold level of performance, no shares will be issued. For awards granted in fiscal 2013, one-third of the target number of shares of stock granted under the awards will be allocated to each fiscal year over the three-year performance period and the actual number of shares to be issued with respect to each fiscal year will be based upon the achievement of that fiscal year’s performance criteria. For performance-based stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013, the number of shares of stock to be issued under the awards is determined based upon the achievement of the performance criteria measured over the entire three-year performance period. Compensation expense for performance-based stock awards is recognized over the three-year performance period based on the expected level of achievement that will be obtained.

Performance-based stock award activity for the year ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance-based stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		0.5		$	17.02
Awards granted		0.8			13.13
Awards forfeited		(0.0	)		15.26
Adjustments to expected number of shares of stock to be issued		(0.3	)		16.84
Outstanding at January 31, 2013		1.0			13.24

Adjustments to the expected number of shares of stock to be issued are due to changes in the expected level of achievement of the performance goals over the life of the awards.

As of January 31, 2013, there was $6.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to performance-based stock awards granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years. As of January 31, 2013, there have been no vesting events for performance-based stock awards under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.

Science Applications International Corporation

Stock-Based Compensation

Note 10—Stock-Based Compensation:

Stock-Based Compensation and Related Tax Benefits Recognized. Stock-based compensation and related tax benefits recognized under all plans were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
	(in millions)
Stock-based compensation expense:
Stock options	$	13	$	17		$	19
Vesting stock awards		69		70			74
Vested stock awards		—		1			1
Performance-based stock awards		2		(5	)		5
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations	$	84	$	83		$	99
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in discontinued operations	$	—	$	2		$	3
Tax benefits recognized from stock-based compensation	$	33	$	33		$	40
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3		$	4

The weighted average grant-date fair value and assumptions used to determine fair value of stock options granted for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	1.81		$	4.21		$	3.96
Expected term (in years)		5.0			4.9			3.8
Expected volatility		24.5	%		23.4	%		25.1	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%		2.2	%		2.1	%
Dividend yield		3.7	%		0	%		0	%

Stock option activity for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Shares of stock under stock options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic value
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2010		31.6			16.26		2.0		66
Options granted		5.3			17.43
Options forfeited or expired		(2.8	)		16.14
Options exercised		(9.1	)		14.08				36
Outstanding at January 31, 2011		25.0			17.31		2.1		11
Options granted		3.9			16.92
Options forfeited or expired		(3.6	)		16.73
Options exercised		(4.5	)		14.69				8
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		20.8			17.90		2.5		—
Options granted		5.0			13.20
Options forfeited or expired		(6.2	)		17.54
Options exercised		—			—				—
Outstanding at January 31, 2013		19.6			16.81		3.0		—
Vested and expected to vest in the future as of January 31, 2013		9.0			18.30		1.2		—

The following table summarizes activity related to exercises of stock options for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Cash received from exercises of stock options	$	—	$	1	$	6
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options		—		14		41
Tax benefits realized from exercises of stock options		—		4		17

Stock options outstanding as of January 31, 2013 were as follows:


Range of exercise prices	Stock options outstanding		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Stock options exercisable		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term
	(in millions)				(in years)		(in millions)				(in years)
$12.00 to $17.00		7.7	$	14.60		5.8		0.7	$	16.88		5.1
$17.01 to $18.00		3.8		17.42		2.2		1.6		17.43		2.2
$18.01 to $19.00		8.0		18.59		0.7		6.5		18.63		0.5
$19.01 to $21.00		0.1		20.12		0.6		0.2		20.12		0.6
		19.6		16.81		3.0		9.0		18.30		1.2

The aggregate intrinsic value for options exercisable at January 31, 2013 was $0 million.

Vesting stock award activity for the year ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Shares of stock under stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Unvested at January 31, 2012		12.0		$	17.50
Awards granted		6.7			13.12
Awards forfeited		(1.4	)		15.71
Awards vested		(4.9	)		17.82
Unvested at January 31, 2013		12.4			15.20

Performance-based stock award activity for the year ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance-based stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		0.5		$	17.02
Awards granted		0.8			13.13
Awards forfeited		(0.0	)		15.26
Adjustments to expected number of shares of stock to be issued		(0.3	)		16.84
Outstanding at January 31, 2013		1.0			13.24

Adjustments to the expected number of shares of stock to be issued are due to changes in the expected level of achievement of the performance goals over the life of the awards.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for compensation-related costs for equity-based compensation, which may include disclosure of policies, compensation plan details, allocation of equity compensation, incentive distributions, equity-based arrangements to obtain goods and services, deferred compensation arrangements, employee stock ownership plan details and employee stock purchase plan details.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 50
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6406099&loc=d3e25284-112666

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 40
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6418621&loc=d3e17540-113929

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6415400&loc=d3e5070-113901

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6415400&loc=d3e5047-113901

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6415400&loc=d3e5444-113901

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
-Number Topic 14

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 123R
-Paragraph 64, 65, A240
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Statement of Position (SOP)
-Number 93-6
-Paragraph 53
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Income Taxes

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Income Taxes

Note 11—Income Taxes:

Substantially all of the Company’s income from continuing operations before income taxes for the three years ended January 31, 2013 was earned in the United States. The provision for income taxes related to continuing operations for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 included the following:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
	(in millions)
Current:
Federal and foreign	$	39	$	218		$	254
State		24		23			47
Deferred:
Federal and foreign		61		(20	)		9
State		11		(11	)		(3	)
Total	$	135	$	210		$	307

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Amount computed at the statutory federal income tax rate (35%)	$	230		$	68		$	299
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit		22			8			28
Change in accruals for uncertain tax positions		—			1			(7	)
CityTime uncertain tax liability		(96	)		96			—
Research and development credits		(10	)		(7	)		(8	)
Dividends paid to employee stock ownership plan		(9	)		—			—
U.S. manufacturing activity benefit		(2	)		(5	)		(5	)
Non-deductible penalties		—			49			—
Total	$	135		$	210		$	307
Effective income tax rate		20.5	%		107.7	%		35.9	%

The Company’s lower effective income tax rate for fiscal 2013 when compared to fiscal 2012 was primarily due to a $96 million reduction in the provision for income tax as the result of an issue resolution agreement with the IRS with respect to the tax deductible portion of the CityTime payment which is described in Note 17. The fiscal 2013 effective tax rate also benefitted from the tax deductibility of quarterly dividends paid on shares held by the SAIC Retirement Plan (an employee stock ownership plan) and the reinstatement with retroactive effect to December 31, 2011 of the federal research and development tax credit. The effective income tax rate for fiscal 2012 was negatively impacted by estimated non-deductible portion of the CityTime loss provision. The fiscal 2011 provision for income taxes included the reversal of $7 million in accruals for unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the settlement of federal and state tax audits.

Deferred income taxes are recorded for differences in the basis of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets (liabilities) were comprised of the following:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Accrued vacation and bonuses	$	83		$	88
Investments		5			8
Deferred compensation		52			54
Vesting stock awards		54			61
Credits and net operating losses carryovers		34			35
Employee benefit contributions		1			6
CityTime loss provision		—			63
Other		33			32
Total deferred tax assets		262			347
Valuation allowance		(7	)		(2	)
Deferred revenue		(79	)		(68	)
Fixed asset basis differences		(14	)		(25	)
Purchased intangible assets		(155	)		(133	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(248	)		(226	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	7		$	119

Net deferred tax assets were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Net current deferred tax assets	$	18		$	82
Net non-current deferred tax (liabilities) assets		(11	)		37
Total net deferred tax assets	$	7		$	119

At January 31, 2013, the Company had $41 million of federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, which will expire in fiscal 2023 to 2030. The Company expects to fully utilize these NOL carryforwards. The Company also has various state NOL carryforwards. The Company has established a valuation allowance for those state NOL carryforwards which it does not expect to utilize. The Company also had $12 million of state tax credits at January 31, 2013, which expire in fiscal 2018 to fiscal 2027. The Company expects to utilize $10 million of these state tax credits.

The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits are primarily related to certain recurring deductions customary for the Company’s industry. The changes in the unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest and penalties, were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year	$	129		$	23		$	44
Additions for tax positions related to current year		—			102			1
Additions for tax positions related to prior years		2			10			1
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years		(107	)		(4	)		(8	)
Settlements with taxing authorities		(1	)		—			(12	)
Lapse of statute of limitations		(2	)		(2	)		(3	)
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year	$	21		$	129		$	23
Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate	$	17		$	115		$	17

In fiscal 2013, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits decreased primarily due to the issue resolution agreement with the IRS with respect to the CityTime loss provision recorded in fiscal 2012. In fiscal 2011, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits decreased primarily due to the resolution of certain tax contingencies with the tax authorities, including $7 million that was recognized as an income tax benefit in fiscal 2012.

At each of January 31, 2013 and 2012, accrued interest and penalties totaled $3 million. A negligible amount of interest and penalties were recognized in the consolidated statements of income in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011.

At January 31, 2013, the balance of unrecognized tax benefits included liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $24 million, all of which is classified as other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The balance of unrecognized tax benefits at January 31, 2012 included liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $132 million, $29 million of which were classified as other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions and is subject to routine compliance reviews by the IRS and other taxing authorities. The Company has effectively settled with the IRS for fiscal years prior to and including fiscal 2008. The Company also settled fiscal 2011 and 2012 as a result of the Company’s participation in the IRS Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) beginning in fiscal 2011. As part of the CAP, the Company and the IRS endeavor to agree on the treatment of all tax positions prior to the tax return being filed, thereby greatly reducing the period of time between tax return submission and settlement with the IRS.

During the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that resolution of reviews by taxing authorities, both domestic and international, could be reached with respect to $16 million of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, including a negligible amount of previously accrued interest, depending on the timing of ongoing examinations, any litigation and expiration of statute of limitations, either because the Company’s tax positions are sustained or because the Company agrees to their disallowance and pays the related income tax. The resolution of the tax matters could result in a $14 million reduction in income tax expense in fiscal 2014. While the Company believes it has adequate accruals for uncertain tax positions, the tax authorities may determine that the Company owes taxes in excess of recorded accruals or the recorded accruals may be in excess of the final settlement amounts agreed to by tax authorities.

Science Applications International Corporation

Income Taxes

Note 11—Income Taxes:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
	(in millions)
Current:
Federal and foreign	$	39	$	218		$	254
State		24		23			47
Deferred:
Federal and foreign		61		(20	)		9
State		11		(11	)		(3	)
Total	$	135	$	210		$	307


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Amount computed at the statutory federal income tax rate (35%)	$	230		$	68		$	299
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit		22			8			28
Change in accruals for uncertain tax positions		—			1			(7	)
CityTime uncertain tax liability		(96	)		96			—
Research and development credits		(10	)		(7	)		(8	)
Dividends paid to employee stock ownership plan		(9	)		—			—
U.S. manufacturing activity benefit		(2	)		(5	)		(5	)
Non-deductible penalties		—			49			—
Total	$	135		$	210		$	307
Effective income tax rate		20.5	%		107.7	%		35.9	%


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Accrued vacation and bonuses	$	83		$	88
Investments		5			8
Deferred compensation		52			54
Vesting stock awards		54			61
Credits and net operating losses carryovers		34			35
Employee benefit contributions		1			6
CityTime loss provision		—			63
Other		33			32
Total deferred tax assets		262			347
Valuation allowance		(7	)		(2	)
Deferred revenue		(79	)		(68	)
Fixed asset basis differences		(14	)		(25	)
Purchased intangible assets		(155	)		(133	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(248	)		(226	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	7		$	119

Net deferred tax assets were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Net current deferred tax assets	$	18		$	82
Net non-current deferred tax (liabilities) assets		(11	)		37
Total net deferred tax assets	$	7		$	119


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year	$	129		$	23		$	44
Additions for tax positions related to current year		—			102			1
Additions for tax positions related to prior years		2			10			1
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years		(107	)		(4	)		(8	)
Settlements with taxing authorities		(1	)		—			(12	)
Lapse of statute of limitations		(2	)		(2	)		(3	)
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year	$	21		$	129		$	23
Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate	$	17		$	115		$	17

- Definition

The entire disclosure for income taxes. Disclosures may include net deferred tax liability or asset recognized in an enterprise's statement of financial position, net change during the year in the total valuation allowance, approximate tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carryforward that gives rise to a significant portion of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, utilization of a tax carryback, and tax uncertainties information.

+ References

+ Details

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Note 12—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) and $(2) million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012		(5	)		(5	)
Unrecognized gain (loss) on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $0 million and $5 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		1			(8	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $2 million and $6 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	(2	)	$	(11	)

As of January 31, 2013, there is less than $1 million of the unrealized net loss on settled derivative instruments (pre-tax) to be amortized and recognized as interest expense during the next 12 months.

Science Applications International Corporation

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Note 12—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) and $(2) million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012		(5	)		(5	)
Unrecognized gain (loss) on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $0 million and $5 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		1			(8	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $2 million and $6 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	(2	)	$	(11	)

- Definition

The entire disclosure for shareholders' equity, comprised of portions attributable to the parent entity and noncontrolling interest, if any, including other comprehensive income (as applicable). Including, but not limited to: (1) balances of common stock, preferred stock, additional paid-in capital, other capital and retained earnings; (2) accumulated balance for each classification of other comprehensive income and total amount of comprehensive income; (3) amount and nature of changes in separate accounts, including the number of shares authorized and outstanding, number of shares issued upon exercise and conversion, and for other comprehensive income, the adjustments for reclassifications to net income; (4) rights and privileges of each class of stock authorized; (5) basis of treasury stock, if other than cost, and amounts paid and accounting treatment for treasury stock purchased significantly in excess of market; (6) dividends paid or payable per share and in the aggregate for each class of stock for each period presented; (7) dividend restrictions and accumulated preferred dividends in arrears (in aggregate and per share amount); (8) retained earnings appropriations or restrictions, such as dividend restrictions; (9) impact of change in accounting principle, initial adoption of new accounting principle and correction of an error in previously issued financial statements; (10) shares held in trust for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP); (11) deferred compensation related to issuance of capital stock; (12) note received for issuance of stock; (13) unamortized discount on shares; (14) description, terms, and number of warrants or rights outstanding; (15) shares under subscription and subscription receivables, effective date of new retained earnings after quasi-reorganization and deficit eliminated by quasi-reorganization and, for a period of at least ten years after the effective date, the point in time from which the new retained dates; and (16) retroactive effective of subsequent change in capital structure.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(d),(e))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21484-112644

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 310
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 4.E)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6228006&loc=d3e74512-122707

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21488-112644

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 210
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.29-31)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 4
-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 4.C)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6959260&loc=d3e187143-122770

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21506-112644

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6959260&loc=d3e187085-122770

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6405834&loc=d3e23285-112656

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21475-112644

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Preferred Stock
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6521494

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21463-112644

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 11
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21564-112644

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 43
-Section B
-Paragraph 7, 11A
-Chapter 1
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
-Number 12
-Paragraph 10
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 5
-Paragraph 15
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 17: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 08
-Paragraph d
-Article 4

Reference 18: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 02
-Paragraph 29, 30, 31
-Article 5

Reference 19: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
-Number Topic 4
-Section E

Reference 20: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 08
-Article 4

Reference 21: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
-Number Topic 4
-Section C

Reference 22: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 129
-Paragraph 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 23: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Article 3

+ Details

Leases

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Leases

Note 13—Leases:

The Company occupies most of its facilities under operating leases. Most of the leases require the Company to pay maintenance and operating expenses such as taxes, insurance and utilities and also contain renewal options to extend the lease and provisions for periodic rate escalations to reflect inflationary increases. Certain equipment is leased under short-term or cancelable operating leases. Rental expense for facilities and equipment related to continuing operations for each of the three fiscal years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Gross rental expense	$	170		$	177		$	173
Less lease and sublease income		(5	)		(17	)		(23	)
Net rental expense	$	165		$	160		$	150

In fiscal 2004, the Company was awarded a contract with the Greek Government (see Note 17) that requires the Company to lease certain equipment under an operating lease from a subcontractor for ten years. The terms of the customer contract and lease agreement provide that if the customer defaults on its payments to the Company to cover the future lease payments, then the Company is not required to make the lease payments to the subcontractor. Consequently, the maximum contingent lease liability of $21 million related to this contract at January 31, 2013 is not reflected in the future minimum lease commitments table below.

Future minimum lease commitments and lease or sublease receipts under non-cancelable operating leases in effect at January 31, 2013 are as follows:


Year Ending January 31	Operating lease commitment		Lease or sublease receipts
	(in millions)
2014	$	121	$	2
2015		113		2
2016		95		2
2017		73		2
2018		60		1
2019 and thereafter		110		8
Total	$	572	$	17

As of January 31, 2013, the Company had capital lease obligations of $4 million that are payable over the next five years.

Science Applications International Corporation

Leases

Note 13—Leases:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Gross rental expense	$	170		$	177		$	173
Less lease and sublease income		(5	)		(17	)		(23	)
Net rental expense	$	165		$	160		$	150

Future minimum lease commitments and lease or sublease receipts under non-cancelable operating leases in effect at January 31, 2013 are as follows:


Year Ending January 31	Operating lease commitment		Lease or sublease receipts
	(in millions)
2014	$	121	$	2
2015		113		2
2016		95		2
2017		73		2
2018		60		1
2019 and thereafter		110		8
Total	$	572	$	17

As of January 31, 2013, the Company had capital lease obligations of $4 million that are payable over the next five years.

- Definition

Tabular disclosure of a lessee's leasing arrangements including: (1) the basis on which contingent rental payments are determined, (2) the existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and escalation clauses, (3) restrictions imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning dividends, additional debt, and further leasing, (4) rent holidays, rent concessions, or leasehold improvement incentives and unusual provisions or conditions. Disclosure may also include the specific period used to amortize material leasehold improvements made at the inception of the lease or during the lease term. Additionally, for operating leases having initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year: (a) future minimum rental payments required as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, in the aggregate and for each of the five succeeding fiscal years, (b) the total of minimum rentals to be received in the future under noncancelable subleases as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, and (c) for all operating leases, rental expense for each period for which an income statement is presented, with separate amounts for minimum rentals, contingent rentals, and sublease rentals. Rental payments under leases with terms of a month or less that were not renewed need not be included.

+ References + Details

Supplementary Income Statement and Cash Flow Information

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Supplementary Income Statement and Cash Flow Information

Note 14—Supplementary Income Statement and Cash Flow Information:

Supplementary income statement information for the years presented were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Depreciation and amortization expense for property, plant and equipment and assets acquired under capital leases	$	68	$	69	$	70
Internal research and development costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses	$	64	$	92	$	55

Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash investing and financing activities, for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Decrease in accrued stock repurchases	$	—		$	(7	)	$	(17	)
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividends	$	3			—			—
Fair value of assets acquired in acquisitions	$	541		$	238		$	470
Cash paid in acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $9 million, $5 million and $10 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively		(483	)		(218	)		(382	)
Non-cash consideration		—			—			—
Accrued acquisition payables, net		(13	)		—			(4	)
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions	$	45		$	20		$	84
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations)	$	92		$	107		$	71
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	128		$	289		$	361

Science Applications International Corporation

Supplementary Income Statement and Cash Flow Information

Note 14—Supplementary Income Statement and Cash Flow Information:

Supplementary income statement information for the years presented were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Depreciation and amortization expense for property, plant and equipment and assets acquired under capital leases	$	68	$	69	$	70
Internal research and development costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses	$	64	$	92	$	55

Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash investing and financing activities, for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Decrease in accrued stock repurchases	$	—		$	(7	)	$	(17	)
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividends	$	3			—			—
Fair value of assets acquired in acquisitions	$	541		$	238		$	470
Cash paid in acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $9 million, $5 million and $10 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively		(483	)		(218	)		(382	)
Non-cash consideration		—			—			—
Accrued acquisition payables, net		(13	)		—			(4	)
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions	$	45		$	20		$	84
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations)	$	92		$	107		$	71
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	128		$	289		$	361

Business Segment Information

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Business Segment Information

Note 15—Business Segment Information:

The Company defines its reportable segments based on the way the chief operating decision maker (CODM), currently its chief executive officer, manages the operations of the Company for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Effective February 1, 2012, certain operations were transferred between the Company’s reportable segments. Prior year amounts have been recasted for consistency with the current year’s presentation.

Defense Solutions provides systems engineering and specialized technical services and solutions in support of command and control, communications, modeling and simulation, logistics, readiness and sustainment and network operations to a broad customer base within the defense industry. Defense Solutions helps design and implement advanced, networked command and control systems to enable U.S. and allied defense customers to plan, direct, coordinate and control forces and operations at strategic, operational and tactical levels. Defense Solutions also provides a wide range of logistics, product support and force modernization solutions, including supply chain management, demand forecasting, distribution, sustaining engineering, maintenance and training services, to enhance the readiness and operational capability of U.S. military personnel and their weapons and support systems. Major customers of Defense Solutions include most branches of the U.S. military.

Health, Energy and Civil Solutions provides services and solutions in the areas of critical infrastructure, homeland security, safety and mission assurance, training, environmental assessments and restoration, engineering design, construction, electronic health record implementations and other sophisticated IT services across a broad federal and commercial customer base. These services and solutions range from engineering, design and construction services, energy management, renewables and energy distribution/smart-grid, to healthcare IT, data management and analytics, health infrastructure and biomedical support and research. Health, Energy and Civil Solutions also provides integrated security solutions and training expertise in the detection of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive threats and designs and develops products and applied technologies that aid anti-terrorism and homeland security efforts, including border, port and security inspection systems and checked baggage explosive detection systems. Major customers of Health, Energy and Civil Solutions primarily include the U.S. federal government, state and local governmental agencies, foreign governments and commercial enterprises in various industries.

Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions provides systems and services focused on intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and cybersecurity across a broad spectrum of national security programs. Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions provides quick reaction, manned and unmanned airborne, maritime, space and ground-based surveillance systems which leverage an understanding of the underlying physics of operating in space, weight and power-constrained environments. Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions also provides intelligence collection, processing, exploitation, and dissemination solutions, including systems designed to optimize decision-making in high rate, large volume, and complex data environments. Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions provides cybersecurity technology and information management solutions, analytics and forensics, accreditation and testing services, and products that protect data, applications, and modern information technology infrastructures from advanced and persistent threats as well as mission support in the geospatial, intelligence analysis, technical operations, and linguistics domains. Major customers of Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions include national and military intelligence agencies, and other federal, civilian and commercial customers in the national security complex.

Corporate and Other includes the operations of the Company’s internal real estate management subsidiary, various corporate activities, certain corporate expense items that are not reimbursed by the Company’s U.S. Government customers and certain revenue and expense items excluded from the CODM’s evaluation of a reportable segment’s performance.

The following tables summarize business segment information for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues:
Defense Solutions	$	4,718		$	4,191		$	4,657
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		2,788			2,734			2,630
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		3,672			3,574			3,460
Corporate and Other		—			2			58
Intersegment elimination		(5	)		(4	)		(7	)
Total revenues	$	11,173		$	10,497		$	10,798
Operating income (loss):
Defense Solutions	$	352		$	(171	)	$	380
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		222			246			242
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		264			279			292
Corporate and Other		(104	)		(55	)		15
Total operating income	$	734		$	299		$	929
Amortization of intangible assets:
Defense Solutions	$	2		$	5		$	7
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		32			24			16
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		11			16			17
Total amortization of intangible assets	$	45		$	45		$	40

Asset information by segment is not a key measure of performance used by the CODM. Interest income, interest expense and provision for income taxes, as reported in the consolidated financial statements, are not part of operating income and are primarily recorded at the corporate level. Under U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards, indirect costs including depreciation expense are collected in numerous indirect cost pools which are then collectively allocated out to the Company’s reportable segments based on a representative causal or beneficial relationship of the costs in the pool to the costs in the base. While depreciation expense is a component of the allocated costs, the allocation process precludes depreciation expense from being specifically identified by the Company’s individual reportable segments. For this reason, depreciation expense by reportable segment has not been reported above.

In preparation for the proposed separation transaction, effective February 1, 2013, the Company transferred certain business operations primarily focused on providing enterprise information technology services to federal civilian agencies of the U.S. Government from the Health, Engineering, and Civil Solutions segment to the Defense Solutions segment. The Company also transferred certain business operations primarily focused on providing command, control, communications, and computer solutions to the DoD from the Defense Solutions segment to the Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions segment. As a result, the Company’s operating segments for fiscal 2014 will be reflective of this new business alignment, the segment results will be recasted to reflect these changes in historical periods, and one of the Company’s operating segments will represent the entirety of the business that will be included in the separation transaction.

Substantially all of the Company’s revenues and tangible long-lived assets are generated by or owned by entities located in the United States. As such, the financial information by geographic location is not presented.

The Company’s total revenues are largely attributable to prime contracts with the U.S. Government or to subcontracts with other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. Government. The percentages of total revenues for the U.S. Government, its agencies and other customers comprising more than 10% of total revenues for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
U.S. Government		87	%		93	%		91	%
U.S. Army		28	%		26	%		23	%
U.S. Navy		13	%		13	%		13	%

Science Applications International Corporation

Business Segment Information

Note 15—Business Segment Information:

The following tables summarize business segment information for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues:
Defense Solutions	$	4,718		$	4,191		$	4,657
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		2,788			2,734			2,630
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		3,672			3,574			3,460
Corporate and Other		—			2			58
Intersegment elimination		(5	)		(4	)		(7	)
Total revenues	$	11,173		$	10,497		$	10,798
Operating income (loss):
Defense Solutions	$	352		$	(171	)	$	380
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		222			246			242
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		264			279			292
Corporate and Other		(104	)		(55	)		15
Total operating income	$	734		$	299		$	929
Amortization of intangible assets:
Defense Solutions	$	2		$	5		$	7
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		32			24			16
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		11			16			17
Total amortization of intangible assets	$	45		$	45		$	40


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
U.S. Government		87	%		93	%		91	%
U.S. Army		28	%		26	%		23	%
U.S. Navy		13	%		13	%		13	%

- Definition

The entire disclosure for reporting segments including data and tables. Reportable segments include those that meet any of the following quantitative thresholds a) it's reported revenue, including sales to external customers and intersegment sales or transfers is 10 percent or more of the combined revenue, internal and external, of all operating segments b) the absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10 percent or more of the greater, in absolute amount of 1) the combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss or 2) the combined reported loss of all operating segments that did report a loss c) its assets are 10 percent or more of the combined assets of all operating segments.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 34
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8981-108599

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 41
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e9038-108599

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 33
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8971-108599

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 12
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8595-108599

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8380-108599

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 32
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8933-108599

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 26
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8844-108599

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 35
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8984-108599

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 40
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e9031-108599

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 42
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e9054-108599

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8538-108599

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 29
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8864-108599

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 31
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8924-108599

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 280
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 30
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6534315&loc=d3e8906-108599

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 131
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Discontinued Operations

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Discontinued Operations

Note 16—Discontinued Operations:

In fiscal 2013, the Company sold certain components of its business, which were historically included in the Company’s Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment, primarily focused on providing operational test and evaluation services to U.S. Government customers. The Company received net proceeds of $51 million resulting in a gain on sale before income taxes of $17 million related to this sale.

In fiscal 2012, in order to better align its business portfolio with its strategy, the Company sold certain components of its business, which were historically included in the Company’s Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment, primarily focused on providing information technology services to international oil and gas companies. The Company received net proceeds of $167 million resulting in a gain on sale before income taxes of $111 million related to this sale.

Under the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company retained the assets and obligations of its defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom. The Company has classified the operating results of these business components, including pension expense through the date of sale, as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Following the sale, as a result of retaining the pension obligation, the remaining components of ongoing pension expense, primarily interest costs and assumed return on plan assets following the sale date, are recorded in continuing operations.

The pre-sale operating results of business components sold by the Company for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	56	$	160	$	319
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		50		131		258
Selling, general and administrative expenses		3		13		31
Operating income	$	3	$	16	$	30

Operating income from discontinued operations also includes other activity that is immaterial and not reflected in the table above.

In March 2001, the Company’s former subsidiary Telcordia Technologies, Inc. (Telcordia) instituted arbitration proceedings against a customer, Telkom South Africa, as a result of a contract dispute. Pursuant to the definitive agreement for the fiscal 2006 sale of Telcordia, the Company was entitled to receive the net proceeds from any settlement after deduction for tax liabilities incurred by Telcordia. In July 2010, Telcordia and Telkom South Africa settled all claims related to these arbitration proceedings. Under the settlement, Telkom South Africa paid $80 million plus amounts for value added taxes (VAT). In fiscal 2011, the Company and Telcordia subsequently executed an agreement which resolved matters related to the Telkom South Africa settlement and certain other contingencies related to the fiscal 2006 sale of Telcordia. The Company recorded pre-tax gains of $77 million in discontinued operations related to these actions during fiscal 2011.

Science Applications International Corporation

Discontinued Operations

Note 16—Discontinued Operations:

The pre-sale operating results of business components sold by the Company for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	56	$	160	$	319
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		50		131		258
Selling, general and administrative expenses		3		13		31
Operating income	$	3	$	16	$	30

Operating income from discontinued operations also includes other activity that is immaterial and not reflected in the table above.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the facts and circumstances leading to the completed or expected disposal, manner and timing of disposal, the gain (loss) recognized in the income statement and the income statement caption that includes that gain (loss), amounts of revenues and pretax profit or loss reported in discontinued operations, the segment in which the disposal group was reported, and the classification (whether sold or classified as held for sale) and carrying value of the assets and liabilities comprising the disposal group. Includes all disposal groups, including those classified as components of the entity (discontinued operations).

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1361-107760

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1436-107760

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1510-107760

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1474-107760

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6892542&loc=d3e1020-107759

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6892542&loc=d3e957-107759

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6892542&loc=d3e1012-107759

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 360
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=8077374&loc=d3e2443-110228

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 360
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6391110&loc=d3e2941-110230

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 144
-Paragraph 43-48
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Legal Proceedings	12 Months Ended
Legal Proceedings	Jan. 31, 2013
Legal Proceedings	Note 17—Legal Proceedings: *Timekeeping Contract with City of New York* In March 2012, the Company reached a settlement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the City of New York (City) relating to investigations being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the City with respect to the Company’s contract to develop and implement an automated time and attendance and workforce management system (CityTime) for certain agencies of the City. As part of this settlement, the Company entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, under which the Company paid approximately $500 million and the U.S. Attorney’s Office deferred prosecution of a single criminal count against the Company, which alleged that the Company, through the conduct of certain managerial employees and others, caused the City to significantly overpay for the CityTime system. If the Company complies with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, the U.S Attorney will dismiss the criminal count at the end of a three-year period. In August 2012, the Company entered into an administrative agreement with the U.S. Army, on behalf of all agencies of the U.S. Government that confirms the Company’s continuing eligibility to enter into and perform contracts with all agencies of the U.S. Government following the CityTime settlement. The Army has determined that the U.S. Government will have adequate assurances under the terms of the administrative agreement that initiation of suspension or debarment is not necessary to protect the U.S. Government’s interests following the CityTime settlement. Under the terms of the administrative agreement, the Company has agreed, among other things, to maintain a contractor responsibility program having the specific elements described in the administrative agreement, including retaining a monitor and providing certain reports to the U.S. Army. The administrative agreement will continue in effect for five years, provided that the Company may request earlier termination after three years. *Data Privacy Litigation* The Company is a defendant in a putative class action, In Re: Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Backup Tape Data Theft Litigation, a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The MDL action consolidates for pretrial proceedings the following seven individual putative class action lawsuits filed against the Company from October 2011 through March 2012: (1) Richardson, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (2) Arellano, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas; (3) Biggerman, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (4) Moskowitz, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (5) Palmer, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al., in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (6) Losack, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California; and (7) Deatrick v. Science Applications International Corporation in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The lawsuits were filed following the theft of computer backup tapes from a vehicle of a Company employee. The employee was transporting the backup tapes between federal facilities under an IT services contract the Company was performing in support of TRICARE, the health care program for members of the military, retirees and their families. The tapes contained personally identifiable and protected health information of approximately five million military clinic and hospital patients. There is no evidence that any of the data on the backup tapes has actually been accessed or viewed by an unauthorized person. In order for an unauthorized person to access or view the data on the backup tapes, it would require knowledge of and access to specific hardware and software and knowledge of the system and data structure. The Company has notified potentially impacted persons by letter and has offered one year of credit monitoring services to those who request these services and in certain circumstances, one year of identity restoration services. In October 2012, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint in the MDL action, which supersedes all previously filed complaints in the individual lawsuits. The consolidated amended complaint includes allegations of negligence, breach of contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts and statutory violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, California data breach notification requirements, the California Unfair Competition Law, various state consumer protection or deceptive practices statutes, state privacy statutes, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Privacy Act of 1974. The consolidated amended complaint seeks monetary relief, including unspecified actual damages, punitive damages, statutory damages of $1,000 for each class member and attorneys’ fees, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims made in the class action lawsuits. In November 2012, the Company filed a motion to dismiss all claims against the Company alleged in the consolidated amended complaint. The court has not yet ruled on the Company’s motion. The Company has insurance coverage against judgments or settlements relating to the claims being brought in these lawsuits, with a $10 million deductible. The insurance coverage also covers the Company’s defense costs, subject to the same deductible. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has recorded a loss provision of $10 million related to these lawsuits, representing the low end of the Company’s estimated gross loss. The Company believes that, if any loss is experienced by the Company in excess of its estimate, such a loss would not exceed the Company’s insurance coverage. As these lawsuits progress, many factors will affect the amount of the ultimate loss resulting from these claims being brought against the Company, including the outcome of any motions to dismiss, the results of any discovery, the outcome of any pretrial motions and the courts’ rulings on certain legal issues. The Company has been informed that the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is investigating matters related to the incident. OCR is the division of HHS charged with enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA) and the privacy, security and data breach rules which implement HIPAA. OCR may, among other things, require a corrective action plan and impose civil monetary penalties against the data owner (Department of Defense) and, in certain situations, against the data owners’ contractors, such as the Company. The Company is cooperating with TRICARE in responding to the OCR investigation. *Derivative and Securities Litigation* Between February and April 2012, six stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed, each purportedly on the Company’s behalf. Two cases have been withdrawn and the four remaining cases were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in In re SAIC, Inc. Derivative Litigation. The consolidated derivative complaint asserts claims against the Company’s directors and against varying groups of the Company’s current and former officers, including the chief executive officer, two former chief executive officers, the chief financial officer, a former group president, the former program manager of the CityTime program, and the former chief systems engineer of the CityTime program. The consolidated derivative complaint claims that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company with respect to the CityTime contract for various reasons, including failure to supervise the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, allowing the Company to issue misleading financial statements, and failure to exercise their oversight responsibilities to ensure that the Company complied with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The complaint further claims that the defendants are liable to the Company under theories of unjust enrichment, gross mismanagement, abuse of control, and violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint because the respective plaintiffs did not serve a pre-suit demand before filing the derivative complaints. The Company has also received two stockholder demand letters related to CityTime (one of which is also related to the TRICARE matter described above), which an independent committee of the Company’s board of directors reviewed. The Company’s lead director has notified both stockholders’ attorneys, on behalf of the board of directors, that the Company has decided not to pursue the claims outlined in their demand letters. Between February and April 2012, alleged stockholders filed three putative securities class actions. One case was withdrawn and two cases were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in In re SAIC, Inc. Securities Litigation. The consolidated securities complaint names as defendants the Company, its chief financial officer, two former chief executive officers, a former group president, and the former program manager on the CityTime program, and was filed purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of SAIC’s common stock from April 11, 2007 through September 1, 2011. The consolidated securities complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegations that the Company and individual defendants made misleading statements or omissions about the Company’s revenues, operating income, and internal controls in connection with disclosures relating to the CityTime project. The plaintiffs seek to recover from the Company and the individual defendants an unspecified amount of damages class members allegedly incurred by buying SAIC’s stock at an inflated price. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims and has filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated securities complaint. The Company currently believes that a loss relating to the above-described stockholder matters is reasonably possible, but the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss in light of the fact that these matters are in their early stages. *Greek Government Contract* In May 2003, the Company entered into a firm-fixed-price contract with the Hellenic Republic of Greece (the Customer) to provide a Command, Control, Communications, Coordination and Integration System (the System) to support the 2004 Athens Summer Olympic Games (the Olympics) and to serve as the security system for the Customer’s public order departments following completion of the Olympics. In November 2008, the Customer accepted the System in writing pursuant to the requirements of the contract. At the time, the Customer determined that the System substantially complied with the terms of the contract and accepted the System with certain alleged minor omissions and deviations. Upon System acceptance, the Company invoiced the Customer for approximately $19 million, representing the undisputed portion of the contract balance owed to the Company. The Customer has not paid this final invoice. In June 2009, the Company initiated arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce against the Customer seeking damages for breaches of contract by the Customer. The Company seeks (i) aggregate damages in excess of $94 million for payment of amounts owed and other claims and damages, (ii) recovery of advance payment and performance bond amounts totaling $26 million and (iii) costs and expenses associated with the arbitration. The Customer filed an answer to the complaint denying liability on various grounds and a supplementary answer asserting set-off claims against amounts sought by the Company. The arbitration hearing was held in May 2012, and the Company filed a final brief in July 2012. Due to the complex nature of the legal and factual issues involved, the outcome of the arbitration is uncertain. As a result of the significant uncertainties on this contract, the Company converted to the completed-contract method of accounting and ceased recognizing revenues for the System development portion of this contract in fiscal 2006. No profits or losses were recorded on the Greek contract during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has recorded $123 million of losses under the Greek contract, reflecting the Company’s estimated total cost to complete the System, assuming the Greek contract value was limited to the cash received to date. Based on the complex nature of this contractual situation and the difficulties encountered to date, significant uncertainties exist and the Company is unable to reliably estimate the ultimate outcome. The Company may reverse a portion of the losses from the Greek contract if it receives future payments as required under the modified Greek contract. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has $16 million of receivables relating to value added tax (VAT) that the Company has paid and believes it is entitled to recover either as a refund from the taxing authorities or as a payment under the Greek contract. The Company has invoiced the Customer for $34 million for VAT and the Customer has failed to make payment. If the Customer fails to pay the outstanding VAT amounts or the Company is unable to recover the amount as a refund from the taxing authorities, the Company’s total losses on the Greek contract could increase. The Company has met certain advance payment and performance bonding requirements through the issuance of euro-denominated standby letters of credit. As of January 31, 2013, there were $3 million in standby letters of credit outstanding relating to the support and maintenance of the System. The Company is seeking recovery of amounts drawn by the Customer in fiscal 2011 on the standby letters of credit in the ongoing arbitration. The principal subcontractor has provided to the Company euro-denominated standby letters of credit in the amount of $23 million as of January 31, 2013, of which $20 million relates to the delivery of the System. The Company may draw on the subcontractor’s standby letters of credit under certain circumstances by providing a statement to the responsible bank that the subcontractor has not fulfilled its obligations under the subcontract. *Nuclear Regulatory Commission* The U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the Company in September 2004 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging civil False Claims Act violations and breach of contract by the Company on two contracts that the Company had with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The complaint alleges that the Company’s performance of several subcontracts on separate U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs, the participation of a Company employee in an industry trade association, and certain other alleged relationships created organizational conflicts of interest under the two NRC contracts. The Company disputes that the work performed on the DOE programs and the alleged relationships raised by the government created organizational conflicts of interest. In July 2008, the jury found in favor of the government on the breach of contract and two False Claims Act counts. The jury awarded a nominal amount of $78 in damages for breach of contract and $2 million in damages for the False Claims Act claims. The judge entered the judgment in October 2008, trebling the False Claims Act damages and awarding a total of $585,000 in civil penalties. The Company appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s judgment as to both liability and damages of $78 on the breach of contract count and rescinded the judgment on the False Claims Act counts, including the aggregate damages and penalties. The Court of Appeals sent the False Claims Act counts back to the District Court for further proceedings. The Company has recorded a liability for an immaterial amount related to this matter as of January 31, 2013 based on its assessment of the likely outcome of this matter. *Other* The Company is also involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, none of which, in the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon current information, will likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Science Applications International Corporation
Legal Proceedings	Note 17—Legal Proceedings: *Timekeeping Contract with City of New York* In March 2012, the Company reached a settlement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the City of New York (City) relating to investigations being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the City with respect to the Company’s contract to develop and implement an automated time and attendance and workforce management system (CityTime) for certain agencies of the City. As part of this settlement, the Company entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, under which the Company paid approximately $500 million and the U.S. Attorney’s Office deferred prosecution of a single criminal count against the Company, which alleged that the Company, through the conduct of certain managerial employees and others, caused the City to significantly overpay for the CityTime system. If the Company complies with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, the U.S Attorney will dismiss the criminal count at the end of a three-year period. In August 2012, the Company entered into an administrative agreement with the U.S. Army, on behalf of all agencies of the U.S. Government that confirms the Company’s continuing eligibility to enter into and perform contracts with all agencies of the U.S. Government following the CityTime settlement. The Army has determined that the U.S. Government will have adequate assurances under the terms of the administrative agreement that initiation of suspension or debarment is not necessary to protect the U.S. Government’s interests following the CityTime settlement. Under the terms of the administrative agreement, the Company has agreed, among other things, to maintain a contractor responsibility program having the specific elements described in the administrative agreement, including retaining a monitor and providing certain reports to the U.S. Army. The administrative agreement will continue in effect for five years, provided that the Company may request earlier termination after three years. *Data Privacy Litigation* The Company is a defendant in a putative class action, In Re: Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Backup Tape Data Theft Litigation, a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The MDL action consolidates for pretrial proceedings the following seven individual putative class action lawsuits filed against the Company from October 2011 through March 2012: (1) Richardson, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (2) Arellano, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas; (3) Biggerman, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (4) Moskowitz, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (5) Palmer, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al., in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (6) Losack, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California; and (7) Deatrick v. Science Applications International Corporation in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The lawsuits were filed following the theft of computer backup tapes from a vehicle of a Company employee. The employee was transporting the backup tapes between federal facilities under an IT services contract the Company was performing in support of TRICARE, the health care program for members of the military, retirees and their families. The tapes contained personally identifiable and protected health information of approximately five million military clinic and hospital patients. There is no evidence that any of the data on the backup tapes has actually been accessed or viewed by an unauthorized person. In order for an unauthorized person to access or view the data on the backup tapes, it would require knowledge of and access to specific hardware and software and knowledge of the system and data structure. The Company has notified potentially impacted persons by letter and has offered one year of credit monitoring services to those who request these services and in certain circumstances, one year of identity restoration services. In October 2012, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint in the MDL action, which supersedes all previously filed complaints in the individual lawsuits. The consolidated amended complaint includes allegations of negligence, breach of contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts and statutory violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, California data breach notification requirements, the California Unfair Competition Law, various state consumer protection or deceptive practices statutes, state privacy statutes, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Privacy Act of 1974. The consolidated amended complaint seeks monetary relief, including unspecified actual damages, punitive damages, statutory damages of $1,000 for each class member and attorneys’ fees, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims made in the class action lawsuits. In November 2012, the Company filed a motion to dismiss all claims against the Company alleged in the consolidated amended complaint. The court has not yet ruled on the Company’s motion. The Company has insurance coverage against judgments or settlements relating to the claims being brought in these lawsuits, with a $10 million deductible. The insurance coverage also covers the Company’s defense costs, subject to the same deductible. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has recorded a loss provision of $10 million related to these lawsuits, representing the low end of the Company’s estimated gross loss. The Company believes that, if any loss is experienced by the Company in excess of its estimate, such a loss would not exceed the Company’s insurance coverage. As these lawsuits progress, many factors will affect the amount of the ultimate loss resulting from these claims being brought against the Company, including the outcome of any motions to dismiss, the results of any discovery, the outcome of any pretrial motions and the courts’ rulings on certain legal issues. The Company has been informed that the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is investigating matters related to the incident. OCR is the division of HHS charged with enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA) and the privacy, security and data breach rules which implement HIPAA. OCR may, among other things, require a corrective action plan and impose civil monetary penalties against the data owner (Department of Defense) and, in certain situations, against the data owners’ contractors, such as the Company. The Company is cooperating with TRICARE in responding to the OCR investigation. *Derivative and Securities Litigation* Between February and April 2012, six stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed, each purportedly on the Company’s behalf. Two cases have been withdrawn and the four remaining cases were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in In re SAIC, Inc. Derivative Litigation. The consolidated derivative complaint asserts claims against the Company’s directors and against varying groups of the Company’s current and former officers, including the chief executive officer, two former chief executive officers, the chief financial officer, a former group president, the former program manager of the CityTime program, and the former chief systems engineer of the CityTime program. The consolidated derivative complaint claims that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company with respect to the CityTime contract for various reasons, including failure to supervise the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, allowing the Company to issue misleading financial statements, and failure to exercise their oversight responsibilities to ensure that the Company complied with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The complaint further claims that the defendants are liable to the Company under theories of unjust enrichment, gross mismanagement, abuse of control, and violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint because the respective plaintiffs did not serve a pre-suit demand before filing the derivative complaints. The Company has also received two stockholder demand letters related to CityTime (one of which is also related to the TRICARE matter described above), which an independent committee of the Company’s board of directors reviewed. The Company’s lead director has notified both stockholders’ attorneys, on behalf of the board of directors, that the Company has decided not to pursue the claims outlined in their demand letters. Between February and April 2012, alleged stockholders filed three putative securities class actions. One case was withdrawn and two cases were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in In re SAIC, Inc. Securities Litigation. The consolidated securities complaint names as defendants the Company, its chief financial officer, two former chief executive officers, a former group president, and the former program manager on the CityTime program, and was filed purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of SAIC’s common stock from April 11, 2007 through September 1, 2011. The consolidated securities complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegations that the Company and individual defendants made misleading statements or omissions about the Company’s revenues, operating income, and internal controls in connection with disclosures relating to the CityTime project. The plaintiffs seek to recover from the Company and the individual defendants an unspecified amount of damages class members allegedly incurred by buying SAIC’s stock at an inflated price. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims and has filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated securities complaint. The Company currently believes that a loss relating to the above-described stockholder matters is reasonably possible, but the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss in light of the fact that these matters are in their early stages. *Greek Government Contract* In May 2003, the Company entered into a firm-fixed-price contract with the Hellenic Republic of Greece (the Customer) to provide a Command, Control, Communications, Coordination and Integration System (the System) to support the 2004 Athens Summer Olympic Games (the Olympics) and to serve as the security system for the Customer’s public order departments following completion of the Olympics. In November 2008, the Customer accepted the System in writing pursuant to the requirements of the contract. At the time, the Customer determined that the System substantially complied with the terms of the contract and accepted the System with certain alleged minor omissions and deviations. Upon System acceptance, the Company invoiced the Customer for approximately $19 million, representing the undisputed portion of the contract balance owed to the Company. The Customer has not paid this final invoice. In June 2009, the Company initiated arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce against the Customer seeking damages for breaches of contract by the Customer. The Company seeks (i) aggregate damages in excess of $94 million for payment of amounts owed and other claims and damages, (ii) recovery of advance payment and performance bond amounts totaling $26 million and (iii) costs and expenses associated with the arbitration. The Customer filed an answer to the complaint denying liability on various grounds and a supplementary answer asserting set-off claims against amounts sought by the Company. The arbitration hearing was held in May 2012, and the Company filed a final brief in July 2012. Due to the complex nature of the legal and factual issues involved, the outcome of the arbitration is uncertain. As a result of the significant uncertainties on this contract, the Company converted to the completed-contract method of accounting and ceased recognizing revenues for the System development portion of this contract in fiscal 2006. No profits or losses were recorded on the Greek contract during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has recorded $123 million of losses under the Greek contract, reflecting the Company’s estimated total cost to complete the System, assuming the Greek contract value was limited to the cash received to date. Based on the complex nature of this contractual situation and the difficulties encountered to date, significant uncertainties exist and the Company is unable to reliably estimate the ultimate outcome. The Company may reverse a portion of the losses from the Greek contract if it receives future payments as required under the modified Greek contract. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has $16 million of receivables relating to value added tax (VAT) that the Company has paid and believes it is entitled to recover either as a refund from the taxing authorities or as a payment under the Greek contract. The Company has invoiced the Customer for $34 million for VAT and the Customer has failed to make payment. If the Customer fails to pay the outstanding VAT amounts or the Company is unable to recover the amount as a refund from the taxing authorities, the Company’s total losses on the Greek contract could increase. The Company has met certain advance payment and performance bonding requirements through the issuance of euro-denominated standby letters of credit. As of January 31, 2013, there were $3 million in standby letters of credit outstanding relating to the support and maintenance of the System. The Company is seeking recovery of amounts drawn by the Customer in fiscal 2011 on the standby letters of credit in the ongoing arbitration. The principal subcontractor has provided to the Company euro-denominated standby letters of credit in the amount of $23 million as of January 31, 2013, of which $20 million relates to the delivery of the System. The Company may draw on the subcontractor’s standby letters of credit under certain circumstances by providing a statement to the responsible bank that the subcontractor has not fulfilled its obligations under the subcontract. *Nuclear Regulatory Commission* The U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the Company in September 2004 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging civil False Claims Act violations and breach of contract by the Company on two contracts that the Company had with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The complaint alleges that the Company’s performance of several subcontracts on separate U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs, the participation of a Company employee in an industry trade association, and certain other alleged relationships created organizational conflicts of interest under the two NRC contracts. The Company disputes that the work performed on the DOE programs and the alleged relationships raised by the government created organizational conflicts of interest. In July 2008, the jury found in favor of the government on the breach of contract and two False Claims Act counts. The jury awarded a nominal amount of $78 in damages for breach of contract and $2 million in damages for the False Claims Act claims. The judge entered the judgment in October 2008, trebling the False Claims Act damages and awarding a total of $585,000 in civil penalties. The Company appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s judgment as to both liability and damages of $78 on the breach of contract count and rescinded the judgment on the False Claims Act counts, including the aggregate damages and penalties. The Court of Appeals sent the False Claims Act counts back to the District Court for further proceedings. The Company has recorded a liability for an immaterial amount related to this matter as of January 31, 2013 based on its assessment of the likely outcome of this matter. *Other* The Company is also involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, none of which, in the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon current information, will likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Other Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Other Commitments and Contingencies	Jan. 31, 2013
Other Commitments and Contingencies	Note 18—Other Commitments and Contingencies: *VirnetX, Inc.* In fiscal 2007, the Company transferred several patents to VirnetX Inc., a subsidiary of VirnetX Holding Corp. In consideration of this transfer, the Company received certain license rights and the right to receive a percentage of the consideration received in patent infringement or enforcement claims against third parties. In November 2012, a jury found that Apple Corporation infringed two of the patents that the Company previously transferred to VirnetX and awarded approximately $368 million to VirnetX. Under its agreements with VirnetX, the Company would receive 25% of the proceeds obtained by VirnetX in this lawsuit against Apple after reduction for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in litigating those claims. In February 2013, the judge entered judgment against Apple consistent with the jury verdict; however, the judgment may be appealed. Therefore, no assurances can be given when or if the Company will receive any proceeds in connection with this jury award. In addition, if the Company receives any proceeds under its agreements with VirnetX, the Company is required to pay a royalty on the proceeds received to the customer who paid for the development of the technology. The Company does not have any assets or liabilities recorded in connection with this matter as of January 31, 2013. *Government Investigations and Reviews* The Company is routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations with respect to its role as a contractor to federal, state and local government customers and in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. The Company is in discussions with the government on various investigations and reviews, including investigations arising under the Civil False Claims Act. As of January 31, 2013, the Company had recorded loss provisions aggregating approximately $15 million relating to such matters. We believe that the probability is remote that the outcome of any current investigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company as a whole, notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material impact on our net income in any particular reporting period. U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and others, routinely audit and review a contractor’s performance on government contracts, indirect rates and pricing practices, and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of the contractor’s compliance with government standards for its business systems, including: a contractor’s accounting system, earned value management system, estimating system, materials management and accounting system, property management system and purchasing system. Both contractors and the U.S. Government agencies conducting these audits and reviews have come under increased scrutiny. As a result, audits and reviews have become more rigorous and the standards to which the Company is held are being more strictly interpreted, increasing the likelihood of an audit or review resulting in an adverse outcome. During the course of its current audits, the DCAA is closely examining and questioning several of the Company’s long established and disclosed practices that it had previously audited and accepted, increasing the uncertainty as to the ultimate conclusion that will be reached. The Company changed its indirect rate structure used in its indirect cost system and its direct labor bid structure used for its estimating system for fiscal 2011 and future years. The DCAA is performing reviews of these changes and the Company’s compliance with certain other U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards. A finding of significant control deficiencies in the Company’s system audits or other reviews can result in decremented billing rates to its U.S. Government customers until the control deficiencies are corrected and their remediation is accepted by the DCMA. The Company’s indirect cost audits by the DCAA have not been completed for fiscal 2006 and subsequent fiscal years. Although the Company has recorded contract revenues subsequent to fiscal 2005 based upon an estimate of costs that the Company believes will be approved upon final audit or review, the Company does not know the outcome of any ongoing or future audits or reviews and adjustments, and if future adjustments exceed the Company’s estimates, its profitability would be adversely affected. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has recorded a liability of $37 million for its current best estimate of net amounts to be refunded to customers for potential adjustments from such audits or reviews of contract costs. *DS&S Joint Venture* In March 2006, the Company sold its interest in DS&S, a joint venture in which the Company owned a 50% interest. As part of the sale, the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser or DS&S for certain legal costs and expenses, including those related to a government investigation involving DS&S and any litigation resulting from that investigation. The Company had deferred the potential gain on this sale pending resolution of the government investigation involving DS&S. This matter was resolved in fiscal 2013 and the Company recorded a gain of $4 million in other income, net, and paid DS&S $4 million in satisfaction of its indemnification obligation. *Other Joint Ventures* The Company has a guarantee that relates only to claims brought by the sole customer of its joint venture, Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC, for specific contractual nonperformance of the joint venture. The Company also has a cross-indemnity agreement with the joint venture partner, pursuant to which the Company will only be ultimately responsible for the portion of any losses incurred under the guarantee equal to its ownership interest of 30%. As of January 31, 2013, the joint venture had completed performance requirements on the customer contract and was in the process of completing contract close-out activities. Based on current conditions, the Company believes the likelihood of having to make any future payment related to the guarantee is remote. In conjunction with a contract award to one of the Company’s joint ventures, Research and Development Solutions, LLC (RDS), each of the three joint venture partners were required to sign a performance guarantee agreement with the U.S. Government. Under this agreement, the Company unconditionally guarantees all of RDS’s obligations to the U.S. Government under the contract award. The Company also has a cross-indemnity agreement with each of the other two joint venture partners to protect it from liabilities for any U.S. Government claims resulting from the actions of the other two joint venture partners and to limit the Company’s liability to its share of the contract work. As of January 31, 2013, the joint venture had completed performance requirements on the customer contract and was in the process of completing contract close-out activities. Based on current conditions, the Company believes the likelihood of having to make any future payment related to the guarantee is remote. *Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)* In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a fixed price agreement to provide engineering, procurement, and construction services to a special purpose limited liability company for a specific renewable energy project. The Company analyzed this arrangement and determined the special purpose limited liability company is a VIE. However, this VIE was not consolidated by the Company because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The project is partially financed by the Company’s provision of extended payment terms in the amount of $100 million for certain of its services performed on the project. The arrangement also contemplates monetary penalties and project guarantees if the Company does not meet certain completion deadlines. The Company expects to bill a total of $220 million to complete the project. At January 31, 2013, the Company had an unbilled receivable balance of $53 million due from this VIE. *Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds* The Company has outstanding letters of credit of $108 million as of January 31, 2013, principally related to guarantees on contracts. The Company also has outstanding surety bonds in the amount of $302 million, principally related to performance and payment bonds on the Company’s contracts. *Other* The Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization Engineering, Manufacturing and Development program was terminated for convenience by the DoD effective in fiscal 2012. From October 2009 through termination, the Company and its prime contractor performed on this program under an undefinitized change order with a provisional billing rate that allowed the Company to receive a lesser amount of the projected fee than the estimated fee due until completion of the contract negotiations. The Company recognized revenues of approximately $481 million, including estimated fee, from October 2009 through January 31, 2013 under the undefinitized change order. During fiscal 2013, an agreement in principle was reached between the prime contractor and the DoD. The Company reduced the fees earned under the undefinitized change order by $2 million during fiscal 2013 as a result of this development. The Company maintains self-insured medical and workers compensation insurance plans. The Company provided estimated accruals for claims incurred but not yet reported of $30 million and $34 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Science Applications International Corporation
Other Commitments and Contingencies	Note 18—Other Commitments and Contingencies: *VirnetX, Inc.* In fiscal 2007, the Company transferred several patents to VirnetX Inc., a subsidiary of VirnetX Holding Corp. In consideration of this transfer, the Company received certain license rights and the right to receive a percentage of the consideration received in patent infringement or enforcement claims against third parties. In November 2012, a jury found that Apple Corporation infringed two of the patents that the Company previously transferred to VirnetX and awarded approximately $368 million to VirnetX. Under its agreements with VirnetX, the Company would receive 25% of the proceeds obtained by VirnetX in this lawsuit against Apple after reduction for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in litigating those claims. In February 2013, the judge entered judgment against Apple consistent with the jury verdict; however, the judgment may be appealed. Therefore, no assurances can be given when or if the Company will receive any proceeds in connection with this jury award. In addition, if the Company receives any proceeds under its agreements with VirnetX, the Company is required to pay a royalty on the proceeds received to the customer who paid for the development of the technology. The Company does not have any assets or liabilities recorded in connection with this matter as of January 31, 2013. *Government Investigations and Reviews* The Company is routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations with respect to its role as a contractor to federal, state and local government customers and in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. The Company is in discussions with the government on various investigations and reviews, including investigations arising under the Civil False Claims Act. As of January 31, 2013, the Company had recorded loss provisions aggregating approximately $15 million relating to such matters. We believe that the probability is remote that the outcome of any current investigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company as a whole, notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material impact on our net income in any particular reporting period. U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and others, routinely audit and review a contractor’s performance on government contracts, indirect rates and pricing practices, and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of the contractor’s compliance with government standards for its business systems, including: a contractor’s accounting system, earned value management system, estimating system, materials management and accounting system, property management system and purchasing system. Both contractors and the U.S. Government agencies conducting these audits and reviews have come under increased scrutiny. As a result, audits and reviews have become more rigorous and the standards to which the Company is held are being more strictly interpreted, increasing the likelihood of an audit or review resulting in an adverse outcome. During the course of its current audits, the DCAA is closely examining and questioning several of the Company’s long established and disclosed practices that it had previously audited and accepted, increasing the uncertainty as to the ultimate conclusion that will be reached. The Company changed its indirect rate structure used in its indirect cost system and its direct labor bid structure used for its estimating system for fiscal 2011 and future years. The DCAA is performing reviews of these changes and the Company’s compliance with certain other U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards. A finding of significant control deficiencies in the Company’s system audits or other reviews can result in decremented billing rates to its U.S. Government customers until the control deficiencies are corrected and their remediation is accepted by the DCMA. The Company’s indirect cost audits by the DCAA have not been completed for fiscal 2006 and subsequent fiscal years. Although the Company has recorded contract revenues subsequent to fiscal 2005 based upon an estimate of costs that the Company believes will be approved upon final audit or review, the Company does not know the outcome of any ongoing or future audits or reviews and adjustments, and if future adjustments exceed the Company’s estimates, its profitability would be adversely affected. As of January 31, 2013, the Company has recorded a liability of $37 million for its current best estimate of net amounts to be refunded to customers for potential adjustments from such audits or reviews of contract costs. *DS&S Joint Venture* In March 2006, the Company sold its interest in DS&S, a joint venture in which the Company owned a 50% interest. As part of the sale, the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser or DS&S for certain legal costs and expenses, including those related to a government investigation involving DS&S and any litigation resulting from that investigation. The Company had deferred the potential gain on this sale pending resolution of the government investigation involving DS&S. This matter was resolved in fiscal 2013 and the Company recorded a gain of $4 million in other income, net, and paid DS&S $4 million in satisfaction of its indemnification obligation. *Other Joint Ventures* The Company has a guarantee that relates only to claims brought by the sole customer of its joint venture, Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC, for specific contractual nonperformance of the joint venture. The Company also has a cross-indemnity agreement with the joint venture partner, pursuant to which the Company will only be ultimately responsible for the portion of any losses incurred under the guarantee equal to its ownership interest of 30%. As of January 31, 2013, the joint venture had completed performance requirements on the customer contract and was in the process of completing contract close-out activities. Based on current conditions, the Company believes the likelihood of having to make any future payment related to the guarantee is remote. In conjunction with a contract award to one of the Company’s joint ventures, Research and Development Solutions, LLC (RDS), each of the three joint venture partners were required to sign a performance guarantee agreement with the U.S. Government. Under this agreement, the Company unconditionally guarantees all of RDS’s obligations to the U.S. Government under the contract award. The Company also has a cross-indemnity agreement with each of the other two joint venture partners to protect it from liabilities for any U.S. Government claims resulting from the actions of the other two joint venture partners and to limit the Company’s liability to its share of the contract work. As of January 31, 2013, the joint venture had completed performance requirements on the customer contract and was in the process of completing contract close-out activities. Based on current conditions, the Company believes the likelihood of having to make any future payment related to the guarantee is remote. *Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)* In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a fixed price agreement to provide engineering, procurement, and construction services to a special purpose limited liability company for a specific renewable energy project. The Company analyzed this arrangement and determined the special purpose limited liability company is a VIE. However, this VIE was not consolidated by the Company because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The project is partially financed by the Company’s provision of extended payment terms in the amount of $100 million for certain of its services performed on the project. The arrangement also contemplates monetary penalties and project guarantees if the Company does not meet certain completion deadlines. The Company expects to bill a total of $220 million to complete the project. At January 31, 2013, the Company had an unbilled receivable balance of $53 million due from this VIE. *Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds* The Company has outstanding letters of credit of $108 million as of January 31, 2013, principally related to guarantees on contracts. The Company also has outstanding surety bonds in the amount of $302 million, principally related to performance and payment bonds on the Company’s contracts. *Other* The Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization Engineering, Manufacturing and Development program was terminated for convenience by the DoD effective in fiscal 2012. From October 2009 through termination, the Company and its prime contractor performed on this program under an undefinitized change order with a provisional billing rate that allowed the Company to receive a lesser amount of the projected fee than the estimated fee due until completion of the contract negotiations. The Company recognized revenues of approximately $481 million, including estimated fee, from October 2009 through January 31, 2013 under the undefinitized change order. During fiscal 2013, an agreement in principle was reached between the prime contractor and the DoD. The Company reduced the fees earned under the undefinitized change order by $2 million during fiscal 2013 as a result of this development. The Company maintains self-insured medical and workers compensation insurance plans. The Company provided estimated accruals for claims incurred but not yet reported of $30 million and $34 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 460
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 450
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6952336&loc=d3e14435-108349

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 210
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 440
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Interpretation (FIN)
-Number 14
-Paragraph 3
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 5
-Paragraph 9, 10, 11, 12
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Note 19—Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

Selected unaudited financial data for each quarter of the last two fiscal years was as follows:


	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Fiscal 2013
Revenues	$	2,764	$	2,828	$	2,870		$	2,711
Operating income	$	208	$	188	$	193		$	145
Income from continuing operations ⁽¹⁾	$	117	$	108	$	112		$	186
Income from discontinued operations	$	—	$	2	$	—		$	—
Net income⁽¹⁾	$	117	$	110	$	112		$	186
Basic earnings per share ⁽²⁾	$	.35	$	.32	$	.33		$	.54
Diluted earnings per share ⁽²⁾	$	.35	$	.32	$	.33		$	.54

Fiscal 2012⁽³⁾
Revenues	$	2,663	$	2,573	$	2,790		$	2,471
Operating income (loss)	$	227	$	206	$	(20	)	$	(114	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations ⁽¹⁾	$	128	$	110	$	(92	)	$	(161	)
Income from discontinued operations	$	3	$	68	$	3		$	—
Net income (loss)⁽¹⁾	$	131	$	178	$	(89	)	$	(161	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share ⁽²⁾	$	.37	$	.51	$	(.27	)	$	(.49	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share ⁽²⁾	$	.36	$	.50	$	(.27	)	$	(.49	)

⁽¹⁾	Income from continuing operations and net income relate to SAIC only, see Science Applications’ amounts detailed below.

⁽²⁾	Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented and therefore may not sum to the total for the fiscal year.

Science Applications:

Income from continuing operations and net income of Science Applications includes interest expense on the related party note and associated income taxes, which relate solely to Science Applications and are not reflected in the consolidated amounts above. Income from continuing operations and net income of Science Applications for each quarter of the last two fiscal years was as follows:


	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
	(in millions)
Fiscal 2013
Income from continuing operations	$	117	$	108	$	112		$	187
Net income	$	117	$	110	$	112		$	187

Fiscal 2012⁽³⁾
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	127	$	110	$	(94	)	$	(161	)
Net income (loss)	$	130	$	178	$	(91	)	$	(161	)

⁽³⁾	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.

Science Applications International Corporation

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Note 19—Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

Selected unaudited financial data for each quarter of the last two fiscal years was as follows:


	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Fiscal 2013
Revenues	$	2,764	$	2,828	$	2,870		$	2,711
Operating income	$	208	$	188	$	193		$	145
Income from continuing operations ⁽¹⁾	$	117	$	108	$	112		$	186
Income from discontinued operations	$	—	$	2	$	—		$	—
Net income⁽¹⁾	$	117	$	110	$	112		$	186
Basic earnings per share ⁽²⁾	$	.35	$	.32	$	.33		$	.54
Diluted earnings per share ⁽²⁾	$	.35	$	.32	$	.33		$	.54

Fiscal 2012⁽³⁾
Revenues	$	2,663	$	2,573	$	2,790		$	2,471
Operating income (loss)	$	227	$	206	$	(20	)	$	(114	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations ⁽¹⁾	$	128	$	110	$	(92	)	$	(161	)
Income from discontinued operations	$	3	$	68	$	3		$	—
Net income (loss)⁽¹⁾	$	131	$	178	$	(89	)	$	(161	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share ⁽²⁾	$	.37	$	.51	$	(.27	)	$	(.49	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share ⁽²⁾	$	.36	$	.50	$	(.27	)	$	(.49	)

⁽¹⁾	Income from continuing operations and net income relate to SAIC only, see Science Applications’ amounts detailed below.

⁽²⁾	Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented and therefore may not sum to the total for the fiscal year.

Science Applications:


	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
	(in millions)
Fiscal 2013
Income from continuing operations	$	117	$	108	$	112		$	187
Net income	$	117	$	110	$	112		$	187

Fiscal 2012⁽³⁾
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	127	$	110	$	(94	)	$	(161	)
Net income (loss)	$	130	$	178	$	(91	)	$	(161	)

⁽³⁾	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the quarterly financial data in the annual financial statements. The disclosure may include a tabular presentation of financial information for each fiscal quarter for the current and previous year, including revenues, gross profit, income or loss before extraordinary items and earnings per share data. It also includes an indication if the information in the note is unaudited, comments on the aggregate effect of year-end adjustments, and an explanation of matters or transactions that affect comparability or are pertinent to an understanding of the information furnished.

+ References + Details

Subsequent Event	12 Months Ended
Subsequent Event	Jan. 31, 2013
Subsequent Event	Note 20—Subsequent Event: In March 2013, SAIC’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share of SAIC common stock payable on June 28, 2013 to stockholders of record on June 14, 2013.
Science Applications International Corporation
Subsequent Event	Note 20—Subsequent Event: In March 2013, SAIC’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share of SAIC common stock payable on June 28, 2013 to stockholders of record on June 14, 2013.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

The Company may dispose (or management may commit to plans to dispose) of components of the business, which are reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Planned Separation Transaction

Planned Separation Transaction

During the year ended January 31, 2013, separation transaction expenses were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31, 2013
	(in millions)
Strategic advisory services	$	18
Investment banking services		3
Legal and accounting services		5
Severance costs		12
Separation transaction expenses in operating income		38
Less: income tax benefit		(15	)
Separation transaction expenses, net of tax	$	23

In connection with the separation transaction, the Company eliminated positions in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 which resulted in severance costs as reflected in the table above.

Operating Cycle

Operating Cycle

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

The Company evaluates its contracts for multiple elements, and when appropriate, separates the contracts into separate units of accounting for revenue recognition.

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Receivables

Receivables

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued Operations

Pre-contract Costs

Pre-contract Costs

Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Restricted Cash

Restricted Cash

The Company has restricted cash balances, primarily representing advances from a customer, that are restricted as to use for certain expenditures related to that customer’s contract.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

Investments

Investments

Variable Interest Entities

Variable Interest Entities

Inventories

Inventories

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, Plant and Equipment


	Depreciation method	Estimated useful lives (in years)
Equipment	Straight-line or declining-balance	2-10
Building	Straight-line	20-40
Building improvements and leasehold improvements	Straight-line	Shorter of lease term or 25

As of January 31, 2013, there were certain properties that were reported as held for sale within the Corporate and Other segment. Two of these properties were sold subsequent to January 31, 2013.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

Foreign Currency

Foreign Currency

Accounting Standards Updates Adopted

Accounting Standards Updates Adopted

Accounting Standards Updates Issued But Not Yet Adopted

Accounting Standards Updates Issued But Not Yet Adopted

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Separation Transaction Expenses

During the year ended January 31, 2013, separation transaction expenses were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31, 2013
	(in millions)
Strategic advisory services	$	18
Investment banking services		3
Legal and accounting services		5
Severance costs		12
Separation transaction expenses in operating income		38
Less: income tax benefit		(15	)
Separation transaction expenses, net of tax	$	23

Schedule of Depreciation using Estimated Useful Lives

Depreciation is recognized using the methods and estimated useful lives as follows:


	Depreciation method	Estimated useful lives (in years)
Equipment	Straight-line or declining-balance	2-10
Building	Straight-line	20-40
Building improvements and leasehold improvements	Straight-line	Shorter of lease term or 25

Earnings Per Share (EPS) (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Reconciliation of Income used in Calculating Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation of the income used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Basic EPS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported	$	523		$	(15	)	$	547
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(17	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	$	512		$	(15	)	$	530
Net income, as reported	$	525		$	59		$	619
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(20	)
Net income, for computing basic EPS	$	514		$	59		$	599
Diluted EPS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported	$	523		$	(15	)	$	547
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(17	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	$	512		$	(15	)	$	530
Net income, as reported	$	525		$	59		$	619
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(11	)		—			(20	)
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$	514		$	59		$	599

Reconciliation of Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding

A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		333		336		364
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards		—		—		2
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		333		336		366

Schedule Of Basic and Diluted EPS

Basic and diluted EPS for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.54	$	(.04	)	$	1.46
Income from discontinued operations		—		.22			.19
	$	1.54	$	.18		$	1.65
Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.54	$	(.04	)	$	1.45
Income from discontinued operations		—		.22			.19
	$	1.54	$	.18		$	1.64

Schedule Of Stock-Based Awards Excluded from Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

The following stock-based awards were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the years presented:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Antidilutive stock options excluded		20		21		19
Performance-based stock awards excluded		1		1		1

Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Certain Financial Statement Captions


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Receivables, net:
Billed and billable receivables	$	1,272		$	1,558
Unbillable receivables, including contract retentions		626			612
Less allowance for doubtful accounts		(9	)		(6	)
	$	1,889		$	2,164
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets:
Inventories	$	192		$	168
Prepaid expenses		51			59
Restricted cash		51			43
Deferred income taxes		18			82
Assets held for sale		30			9
Prepaid income taxes and tax refunds receivable		94			41
Other		18			37
	$	454		$	439
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Computers and other equipment	$	314		$	305
Buildings and improvements		148			181
Leasehold improvements		212			194
Office furniture and fixtures		57			54
Land		27			32
Construction in progress		2			6
		760			772
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(442	)		(424	)
	$	318		$	348
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	435		$	485
Accrued liabilities *		682			1,265
Collections in excess of revenues on uncompleted contracts and deferred revenue		132			211
	$	1,249		$	1,961
Accrued payroll and employee benefits:
Salaries, bonuses and amounts withheld from employees’ compensation	$	298		$	251
Accrued vacation		236			246
Accrued contributions to employee benefit plans		8			7
	$	542		$	504
Other long-term liabilities:
Accrued pension liabilities	$	8		$	29
Deferred compensation		44			41
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions		24			29
Deferred tax liabilities		25			—
Other		67			63
	$	168		$	162

*	Includes the $500 million CityTime obligation as of January 31, 2012 described in Note 17.

Acquisitions (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Acquisition Information

Acquisition information for the years presented was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	($ in millions)
Number of acquisitions		1		2		3
Cash consideration (paid and accrued)	$	505	$	223	$	389

Schedule of Purchase Price Allocations Related to Acquisitions

Purchase price (preliminary or final) allocations for the years presented were as follows ($ in millions):


	2013		2012		2011
Purchase price allocations:
Goodwill:
Tax deductible goodwill	$	—	$	30	$	16
Non-tax deductible goodwill		395		135		223
Identifiable intangible assets:
Customer relationships (finite-lived)	$	62	$	28	$	9
Software and technology (finite-lived)		—		—		110
Other (finite-lived)		10		1		—
In-process research and development (indefinite-lived)		—		—		27
Weighted average lives of finite-lived intangibles:
Customer relationships		5 years		5 years		2 years
Software and technology		—		—		8 years
Other		1 year		3 years		—
All finite-lived intangible assets		4 years		5 years		7 years

Estimated Fair Values of Assets Acquired And Liabilities Assumed

The preliminary estimated fair values of the maxIT assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition were as follows (in millions):


Cash	$	9
Receivables		50
Other assets		24
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued payroll and employee benefits		(21	)
Deferred tax liabilities, net		(24	)
Total identifiable net assets acquired		38
Goodwill		395
Intangible assets		72
Total preliminary purchase price (including accrued acquisition payments of $13 million)	$	505

- Definition

Tabular disclosure of a material business combination completed during the period, including background, timing, and recognized assets and liabilities. This table does not include leveraged buyouts.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1486-128463

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7659399&loc=d3e1392-128463

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141
-Paragraph 51
-Subparagraph a
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph F4
-Subparagraph e
-Appendix F

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141
-Paragraph 52
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 68
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Changes in Goodwill by Segment

The balance and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were as follows:


	DS		HECS			ICS		Total
	(in millions)
Balance at January 31, 2011	$	405	$	608		$	625	$	1,638
Acquisitions		—		165			—		165
Adjustments		5		(14	)		6		(3	)
Balance at January 31, 2012		410		759			631		1,800
Acquisitions		—		395			—		395
Adjustments		—		(10	)		10		—
Balance at January 31, 2013	$	410	$	1,144		$	641	$	2,195

Schedule of Intangible Assets Including Estimates of Assets Acquired

Intangible assets, including those arising from preliminary estimates of assets acquired relating to acquisitions, consisted of the following:


	January 31
	2013							2012
	Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value		Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value
	(in millions)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	175	$	(73	)	$	102	$	120	$	(62	)	$	58
Software and technology		127		(57	)		70		148		(48	)		100
Other		2		(1	)		1		2		(1	)		1
Total finite-lived intangible assets		304		(131	)		173		270		(111	)		159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
In-process research and development		13		—			13		13		—			13
Trade names		4		—			4		4		—			4
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets		17		—			17		17		—			17
Total intangible assets	$	321	$	(131	)	$	190	$	287	$	(111	)	$	176

Schedule of Amortization Expense for Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

The estimated annual amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets as of January 31, 2013 was as follows:


Year Ending January 31
	(in millions)
2014	$	44
2015		35
2016		32
2017		27
2018		18
2019 and thereafter		17
	$	173

- Definition

Tabular disclosure of goodwill by reportable segment and in total which includes a rollforward schedule.

+ References + Details

Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

The Company’s notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following for the years presented:


					January 31
	Stated interest rate		Effective interest rate		2013		2012
					($ in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45%		4.53%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95%		6.03%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which matured in July 2012		6.25%		6.50%		—		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13%		7.43%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50%		5.78%		297		296
Other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2017		0%-2.5%		Various		4		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt						1,298		1,852
Less current portion						2		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion					$	1,296	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt					$	1,390	$	2,011

Schedule of Maturities of Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

Maturities of notes payable and long-term debt are as follows:


Year Ending January 31	Total
	(in millions)
2014	$	2
2015		2
2016		1
2017		1
2018		—
2019 and thereafter		1,300
Total principal payments		1,306
Less unamortized discount		8
	$	1,298

- Definition

Tabular disclosure of long-debt instruments or arrangements, including identification, terms, features, collateral requirements and other information necessary to a fair presentation. These are debt arrangements that originally required repayment more than twelve months after issuance or greater than the normal operating cycle of the entity, if longer.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 210
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.22)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 942
-SubTopic 470
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6479336&loc=d3e64711-112823

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21475-112644

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(e),(f))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 835
-SubTopic 30
-Section 55
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6584090&loc=d3e28878-108400

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21538-112644

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 835
-SubTopic 30
-Section 45
-Paragraph 1A
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6451184&loc=d3e28541-108399

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21506-112644

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 835
-SubTopic 30
-Section 45
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6451184&loc=d3e28551-108399

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 7
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21521-112644

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 02
-Paragraph 22
-Article 5

+ Details

Retirement Plans (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Funded Status

The following tables set forth the funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets for this plan.


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	149		$	131
Interest cost		4			7
Actuarial loss		3			15
Benefits paid		(2	)		(2	)
Prior service costs		—			1
Settlements		(63	)		—
Foreign exchange rate changes		3			(3	)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	$	94		$	149
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	120		$	111
Actual return on plan assets		7			6
Settlements		(46	)		—
Company contributions		5			8
Benefits paid		(2	)		(2	)
Foreign exchange rate changes		2			(3	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	86		$	120
Funded status at end of year	$	(8	)	$	(29	)


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	94		$	149
Amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
Accrued pension liability (other long-term liabilities)	$	(8	)	$	(29	)
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
Net actuarial (gain) loss (pretax)	$	(1	)	$	13

Schedule of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for this plan were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Service cost	$	—		$	—		$	1
Interest cost		4			7			7
Expected return on plan assets		(5	)		(5	)		(7	)
Prior service costs		—			1			—
Contractual termination benefits		—			—			1
	$	(1	)	$	3		$	2

Schedule of Assumptions used to Determine Benefit Obligations

The weighted-average assumptions used in determining the benefit obligations and the net periodic benefit cost of pension were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the plan’s measurement date:
Discount rate		4.7	%		4.4	%
Rate of compensation increase		0.0			3.8

Schedule of Assumptions used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate		4.4	%		5.6	%		5.5	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets		4.2			4.6			6.8
Rate of compensation increase		0.0			4.4			4.3

Schedule of Fair Value of Plan Assets

The following tables set forth the fair value of plan assets and related level of inputs used to determine the fair value of plan assets in each asset class as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements (see Note 1):


January 31, 2013	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1 inputs)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2 inputs)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 inputs)		Total
	(in millions)
Asset class:
International equity securities	$	—	$	37	$	—	$	37
United Kingdom government bonds		—		17		—		17
Corporate bonds		—		31		—		31
Cash		1		—		—		1
	$	1	$	85	$	—	$	86


January 31, 2012	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1 inputs)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2 inputs)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 inputs)		Total
	(in millions)
Asset class:
International equity securities	$	—	$	44	$	—	$	44
United Kingdom government bonds		—		15		—		15
Corporate bonds		—		21		—		21
Cash		40		—		—		40
	$	40	$	80	$	—	$	120

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Stock-Based Compensation and Related Tax Benefits Recognized

Stock-based compensation and related tax benefits recognized under all plans were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
	(in millions)
Stock-based compensation expense:
Stock options	$	13	$	17		$	19
Vesting stock awards		69		70			74
Vested stock awards		—		1			1
Performance-based stock awards		2		(5	)		5
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations	$	84	$	83		$	99
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in discontinued operations	$	—	$	2		$	3
Tax benefits recognized from stock-based compensation	$	33	$	33		$	40
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3		$	4

Schedule of Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value And Assumptions Used

The weighted average grant-date fair value and assumptions used to determine fair value of stock options granted for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	1.81		$	4.21		$	3.96
Expected term (in years)		5.0			4.9			3.8
Expected volatility		24.5	%		23.4	%		25.1	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%		2.2	%		2.1	%
Dividend yield		3.7	%		0	%		0	%

Schedule of Stock Option Activity

Stock option activity for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Shares of stock under stock options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic value
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2010		31.6			16.26		2.0		66
Options granted		5.3			17.43
Options forfeited or expired		(2.8	)		16.14
Options exercised		(9.1	)		14.08				36
Outstanding at January 31, 2011		25.0			17.31		2.1		11
Options granted		3.9			16.92
Options forfeited or expired		(3.6	)		16.73
Options exercised		(4.5	)		14.69				8
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		20.8			17.90		2.5		—
Options granted		5.0			13.20
Options forfeited or expired		(6.2	)		17.54
Options exercised		—			—				—
Outstanding at January 31, 2013		19.6			16.81		3.0		—
Vested and expected to vest in the future as of January 31, 2013		9.0			18.30		1.2		—

Schedule of Share-Based Compensation Activity Related to Exercise of Stock Options

The following table summarizes activity related to exercises of stock options for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Cash received from exercises of stock options	$	—	$	1	$	6
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options		—		14		41
Tax benefits realized from exercises of stock options		—		4		17

Schedule of Options Outstanding

Stock options outstanding as of January 31, 2013 were as follows:


Range of exercise prices	Stock options outstanding		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Stock options exercisable		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term
	(in millions)				(in years)		(in millions)				(in years)
$12.00 to $17.00		7.7	$	14.60		5.8		0.7	$	16.88		5.1
$17.01 to $18.00		3.8		17.42		2.2		1.6		17.43		2.2
$18.01 to $19.00		8.0		18.59		0.7		6.5		18.63		0.5
$19.01 to $21.00		0.1		20.12		0.6		0.2		20.12		0.6
		19.6		16.81		3.0		9.0		18.30		1.2

Schedule of Vesting Stock Award Activity

Vesting stock award activity for the year ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Shares of stock under stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Unvested at January 31, 2012		12.0		$	17.50
Awards granted		6.7			13.12
Awards forfeited		(1.4	)		15.71
Awards vested		(4.9	)		17.82
Unvested at January 31, 2013		12.4			15.20

Schedule of Performance-Based Stock Award Activity

Performance-based stock award activity for the year ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance-based stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		0.5		$	17.02
Awards granted		0.8			13.13
Awards forfeited		(0.0	)		15.26
Adjustments to expected number of shares of stock to be issued		(0.3	)		16.84
Outstanding at January 31, 2013		1.0			13.24

Income Taxes (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes related to continuing operations for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 included the following:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012			2011
	(in millions)
Current:
Federal and foreign	$	39	$	218		$	254
State		24		23			47
Deferred:
Federal and foreign		61		(20	)		9
State		11		(11	)		(3	)
Total	$	135	$	210		$	307

Schedule of Reconciliation of Provision for Income Taxes


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Amount computed at the statutory federal income tax rate (35%)	$	230		$	68		$	299
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit		22			8			28
Change in accruals for uncertain tax positions		—			1			(7	)
CityTime uncertain tax liability		(96	)		96			—
Research and development credits		(10	)		(7	)		(8	)
Dividends paid to employee stock ownership plan		(9	)		—			—
U.S. manufacturing activity benefit		(2	)		(5	)		(5	)
Non-deductible penalties		—			49			—
Total	$	135		$	210		$	307
Effective income tax rate		20.5	%		107.7	%		35.9	%

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities)


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Accrued vacation and bonuses	$	83		$	88
Investments		5			8
Deferred compensation		52			54
Vesting stock awards		54			61
Credits and net operating losses carryovers		34			35
Employee benefit contributions		1			6
CityTime loss provision		—			63
Other		33			32
Total deferred tax assets		262			347
Valuation allowance		(7	)		(2	)
Deferred revenue		(79	)		(68	)
Fixed asset basis differences		(14	)		(25	)
Purchased intangible assets		(155	)		(133	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(248	)		(226	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	7		$	119

Schedule of Net Deferred Tax Assets

Net deferred tax assets were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Net current deferred tax assets	$	18		$	82
Net non-current deferred tax (liabilities) assets		(11	)		37
Total net deferred tax assets	$	7		$	119

Schedule of Changes in Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The changes in the unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest and penalties, were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year	$	129		$	23		$	44
Additions for tax positions related to current year		—			102			1
Additions for tax positions related to prior years		2			10			1
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years		(107	)		(4	)		(8	)
Settlements with taxing authorities		(1	)		—			(12	)
Lapse of statute of limitations		(2	)		(2	)		(3	)
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year	$	21		$	129		$	23
Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate	$	17		$	115		$	17

- Definition

Tabular disclosure of tax positions taken in the tax returns filed or to be filed for which it is more likely than not that the tax position will not be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities (i.e., uncertain tax positions) and other types of income tax contingencies, including: (1) the policy on classification of interest and penalties; (2) a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning and end of the period; the total amount(s) of: (3) unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, and (4) interest and penalties recognized in each of the income statement and balance sheet; (5) for positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts unrecognized will significantly change within 12 months of the reporting date the: (i) nature of the uncertainty, (ii) nature of the event that could occur that would cause the change, and (iii) an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible change or a statement that an estimate of the range cannot be made; and (6) a description of tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.

+ References + Details

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:


	January 31
	2013			2012
	(in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) and $(2) million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012		(5	)		(5	)
Unrecognized gain (loss) on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $0 million and $5 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		1			(8	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $2 million and $6 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	(2	)	$	(11	)

Leases (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Rental Expense for Facilities and Equipment

Rental expense for facilities and equipment related to continuing operations for each of the three fiscal years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Gross rental expense	$	170		$	177		$	173
Less lease and sublease income		(5	)		(17	)		(23	)
Net rental expense	$	165		$	160		$	150

Schedule of Future Minimum Lease Commitments and Sublease Receipts under Non-Cancelable Operating Leases

Future minimum lease commitments and lease or sublease receipts under non-cancelable operating leases in effect at January 31, 2013 are as follows:


Year Ending January 31	Operating lease commitment		Lease or sublease receipts
	(in millions)
2014	$	121	$	2
2015		113		2
2016		95		2
2017		73		2
2018		60		1
2019 and thereafter		110		8
Total	$	572	$	17

Supplementary Income Statement and Cash Flow Information (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Supplementary Income Statement Information

Supplementary income statement information for the years presented were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Depreciation and amortization expense for property, plant and equipment and assets acquired under capital leases	$	68	$	69	$	70
Internal research and development costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses	$	64	$	92	$	55

Schedule of Supplementary Cash Flow Information

Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash investing and financing activities, for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Decrease in accrued stock repurchases	$	—		$	(7	)	$	(17	)
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividends	$	3			—			—
Fair value of assets acquired in acquisitions	$	541		$	238		$	470
Cash paid in acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $9 million, $5 million and $10 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively		(483	)		(218	)		(382	)
Non-cash consideration		—			—			—
Accrued acquisition payables, net		(13	)		—			(4	)
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions	$	45		$	20		$	84
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations)	$	92		$	107		$	71
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	128		$	289		$	361

Business Segment Information (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Segment Reporting Information by Segment

The following tables summarize business segment information for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues:
Defense Solutions	$	4,718		$	4,191		$	4,657
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		2,788			2,734			2,630
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		3,672			3,574			3,460
Corporate and Other		—			2			58
Intersegment elimination		(5	)		(4	)		(7	)
Total revenues	$	11,173		$	10,497		$	10,798
Operating income (loss):
Defense Solutions	$	352		$	(171	)	$	380
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		222			246			242
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		264			279			292
Corporate and Other		(104	)		(55	)		15
Total operating income	$	734		$	299		$	929
Amortization of intangible assets:
Defense Solutions	$	2		$	5		$	7
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		32			24			16
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		11			16			17
Total amortization of intangible assets	$	45		$	45		$	40

Schedule of Total Revenue Percentages Contributable to Specific Government Agencies

Government, its agencies and other customers comprising more than 10% of total revenues for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013			2012			2011
U.S. Government		87	%		93	%		91	%
U.S. Army		28	%		26	%		23	%
U.S. Navy		13	%		13	%		13	%

- Definition

Tabular disclosure of the profit or loss and total assets for each reportable segment. An entity discloses certain information on each reportable segment if the amounts (a) are included in the measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by the chief operating decision maker or (b) are otherwise regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker, even if not included in that measure of segment profit or loss.

+ References + Details

Discontinued Operations (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Pre-Sale Operating Results of Discontinued Operations

The pre-sale operating results of business components sold by the Company for each of the three years ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:


	Year Ended January 31
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	56	$	160	$	319
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		50		131		258
Selling, general and administrative expenses		3		13		31
Operating income	$	3	$	16	$	30

- Definition

Tabular disclosure of disposal groups, which may include the gain (loss) recognized in the income statement and the income statement caption that includes that gain (loss), amounts of revenues and pretax profit or loss reported in discontinued operations, the classification and carrying value of the assets and liabilities comprising the disposal group, and the segment in which the disposal group was reported. Also may include the amount of adjustments to amounts previously reported in discontinued operations such as resolution of contingencies arising from the disposal transaction or the operations of the component prior to disposal.

+ References + Details

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Schedule of Selected Quarterly Financial Data

Selected unaudited financial data for each quarter of the last two fiscal years was as follows:


	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Fiscal 2013
Revenues	$	2,764	$	2,828	$	2,870		$	2,711
Operating income	$	208	$	188	$	193		$	145
Income from continuing operations ⁽¹⁾	$	117	$	108	$	112		$	186
Income from discontinued operations	$	—	$	2	$	—		$	—
Net income⁽¹⁾	$	117	$	110	$	112		$	186
Basic earnings per share ⁽²⁾	$	.35	$	.32	$	.33		$	.54
Diluted earnings per share ⁽²⁾	$	.35	$	.32	$	.33		$	.54

Fiscal 2012⁽³⁾
Revenues	$	2,663	$	2,573	$	2,790		$	2,471
Operating income (loss)	$	227	$	206	$	(20	)	$	(114	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations ⁽¹⁾	$	128	$	110	$	(92	)	$	(161	)
Income from discontinued operations	$	3	$	68	$	3		$	—
Net income (loss)⁽¹⁾	$	131	$	178	$	(89	)	$	(161	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share ⁽²⁾	$	.37	$	.51	$	(.27	)	$	(.49	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share ⁽²⁾	$	.36	$	.50	$	(.27	)	$	(.49	)

⁽¹⁾	Income from continuing operations and net income relate to SAIC only, see Science Applications’ amounts detailed below.

⁽²⁾	Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented and therefore may not sum to the total for the fiscal year.

Science Applications International Corporation

Schedule of Selected Quarterly Financial Data

Income from continuing operations and net income of Science Applications for each quarter of the last two fiscal years was as follows:


	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
	(in millions)
Fiscal 2013
Income from continuing operations	$	117	$	108	$	112		$	187
Net income	$	117	$	110	$	112		$	187

Fiscal 2012⁽³⁾
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	127	$	110	$	(94	)	$	(161	)
Net income (loss)	$	130	$	178	$	(91	)	$	(161	)

⁽³⁾	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Additional Information (Detail) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2012 Entity	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($) Customer $ / shares yr	Jan. 31, 2012 USD ($) $ / shares	Jan. 31, 2011 USD ($) $ / shares
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Percentage of shares of newly formed company after spin-off transaction	100.00%
Number of companies separated \| Entity	2
Increase (decrease) in income due to contract estimates \| $		$ 18	$ 37	$ 44
Increase (decrease) in income due to contract estimates per diluted share \| $ / shares		$ 0.03	$ 0.07	$ 0.08
Period for billing and collection of unbilled receivables, maximum (in years)		1
Period of collection for contract retentions, minimum (in years)		1
Outstanding receivables \| $		$ 104
Number of commercial customers within extended deferred payments terms \| Customer		1
Noncontrolling ownership interest		50.00%
Minimum likelihood of tax benefits being recognized upon ultimate settlement		50.00%
Minimum
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Operating cycle (in years)		One
Period of extension for deferred payment terms (in years)		1
Maximum
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents original maturity period		3 months
Science Applications International Corporation
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Ownership interest		100.00%

Separation Transaction Expenses (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
Separation Transaction Expenses (Detail) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Spin Off Transaction [Line Items]
Strategic advisory services	$ 18
Investment banking services	3
Legal and accounting services	5
Severance costs	12
Separation transaction expenses in operating income	38
Less: income tax benefit	(15)
Separation transaction expenses, net of tax	$ 23

- Definition

The charge against earnings in the period for known and estimated costs of termination benefits provided to current employees that are involuntarily terminated under a benefit arrangement associated with exit from or disposal of business activities or restructurings pursuant to a duly authorized plan, excluding costs or losses pertaining to an entity newly acquired in a business combination or a discontinued operation as defined by generally accepted accounting principles and costs associated with one-time termination benefits.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 420
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (b)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394359&loc=d3e17939-110869

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 420
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 5.P.4(b))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394695&loc=d3e140904-122747

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (a)(10)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=21915506&loc=d3e1928-114920

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 420
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 5.P.3)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394695&loc=d3e140864-122747

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 230
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 28
-Subparagraph (b)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6943989&loc=d3e3602-108585

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5-8
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
-Number Topic 5
-Section P
-Subsection 3, 4

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 146
-Paragraph 8-13, 20
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Staff Position (FSP)
-Number FAS146-1
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 112
-Paragraph 7
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Schedule of Depreciation using Estimated Useful Lives (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013
Equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciation method	Straight-line or declining-balance
Equipment \| Minimum
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Estimated useful lives (in years)	2 years
Equipment \| Maximum
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Estimated useful lives (in years)	10 years
Building
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciation method	Straight-line
Building \| Minimum
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Estimated useful lives (in years)	20 years
Building \| Maximum
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Estimated useful lives (in years)	40 years
Building improvements and leasehold improvements
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciation method	Straight-line
Estimated useful lives (in years)	Shorter of lease term or 25
Building improvements and leasehold improvements \| Maximum
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Estimated useful lives (in years)	25 years

Reconciliation of Income used in Calculating Earnings per Share (Detail) - USD ($)
$ in Millions

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

^[1]

Oct. 31, 2012

^[1]

Jul. 31, 2012

^[1]

Apr. 30, 2012

^[1]

Jan. 31, 2012

^[1],[2]

Oct. 31, 2011

^[1],[2]

Jul. 31, 2011

^[1],[2]

Apr. 30, 2011

^[1],[2]

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2012

Jan. 31, 2011

Basic EPS:

Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported

$ 186

$ 112

$ 108

$ 117

$ (161)

$ (92)

$ 110

$ 128

$ 523

$ (15)

$ 547

Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities

(11)

(17)

Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS

512

(15)

530

Net income, as reported

186

112

110

117

(161)

(89)

178

131

525

619

Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities

(11)

(20)

Net income, for computing basic EPS

514

599

Diluted EPS:

Income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported

186

112

108

117

(161)

(92)

110

128

523

(15)

547

Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities

(11)

(17)

Income (loss) from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS

512

(15)

530

Net income, as reported

$ 186

$ 112

$ 110

$ 117

$ (161)

$ (89)

$ 178

$ 131

525

619

Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities

(11)

(20)

Net income, for computing diluted EPS

$ 514

$ 59

$ 599

[1]	Income from continuing operations and net income relate to SAIC only, see Science Applications' amounts detailed below.
[2]	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.

Reconciliation of Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding (Detail) - shares shares in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	333	336	364
Dilutive common share equivalents-stock options and other stock awards			2
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	333	336	366

- Definition

The average number of shares or units issued and outstanding that are used in calculating diluted EPS or earnings per unit (EPU), determined based on the timing of issuance of shares or units in the period.

+ References + Details

- Definition

Number of [basic] shares or units, after adjustment for contingently issuable shares or units and other shares or units not deemed outstanding, determined by relating the portion of time within a reporting period that common shares or units have been outstanding to the total time in that period.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (a)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6371337&loc=d3e3550-109257

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7655603&loc=d3e1448-109256

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Weighted-Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6528421

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 07-4
-Paragraph 4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 8
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 171
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 40
-Subparagraph a
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Schedule of Basic and Diluted EPS (Detail) - $ / shares

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

^[1]

Oct. 31, 2012

^[1]

Jul. 31, 2012

^[1]

Apr. 30, 2012

^[1]

Jan. 31, 2012

^[1],[2]

Oct. 31, 2011

^[1],[2]

Jul. 31, 2011

^[1],[2]

Apr. 30, 2011

^[1],[2]

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2012

Jan. 31, 2011

Basic:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$ 1.54

$ (0.04)

$ 1.46

Income from discontinued operations

0.22

0.19

Total basic earnings per share

$ 0.54

$ 0.33

$ 0.32

$ 0.35

$ (0.49)

$ (0.27)

$ 0.51

$ 0.37

1.54

0.18

1.65

Diluted:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

1.54

(0.04)

1.45

Income from discontinued operations

0.22

0.19

Total diluted earnings per share

$ 0.54

$ 0.33

$ 0.32

$ 0.35

$ (0.49)

$ (0.27)

$ 0.50

$ 0.36

$ 1.54

$ 0.18

$ 1.64

[1]	Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented and therefore may not sum to the total for the fiscal year.
[2]	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.

- Definition

The amount of net income (loss) for the period per each share of common stock or unit outstanding during the reporting period.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 225
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-03.21)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6880815&loc=d3e20235-122688

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6371337&loc=d3e3550-109257

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 55
-Paragraph 52
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=16381557&loc=d3e4984-109258

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7655603&loc=d3e1252-109256

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 944
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.7-04.19)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879464&loc=d3e573970-122913

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 942
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.9-04.23)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879574&loc=d3e536633-122882

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 18
-Article 7

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 36, 37, 38
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 07-4
-Paragraph 4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 03
-Paragraph 20
-Article 5

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 21
-Article 9

+ Details

- Definition

The amount of net income (loss) for the period available to each share of common stock or common unit outstanding during the reporting period and to each share or unit that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares or units for all dilutive potential common shares or units outstanding during the reporting period.

+ References + Details

- Definition

The amount of net income (loss) from continuing operations per each share of common stock or unit outstanding during the reporting period.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7655603&loc=d3e1252-109256

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 225
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-03.21)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6880815&loc=d3e20235-122688

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 944
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.7-04.19)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879464&loc=d3e573970-122913

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 942
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.9-04.23)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879574&loc=d3e536633-122882

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 07-4
-Paragraph 4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 03
-Paragraph 20
-Article 5

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 18
-Article 7

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 21
-Article 9

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 36, 37, 38
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

- Definition

The amount of net income (loss) derived from continuing operations during the period available to each share of common stock or common unit outstanding during the reporting period and to each share or unit that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares or units for all dilutive potential common shares or units outstanding during the reporting period.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (a)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6371337&loc=d3e3550-109257

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 225
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-03.21)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6880815&loc=d3e20235-122688

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7655603&loc=d3e1252-109256

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 03
-Paragraph 20
-Article 5

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 40
-Subparagraph a
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 11, 12, 36, 37, 38
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 21
-Article 9

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 07-4
-Paragraph 4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 18
-Article 7

+ Details

- Definition

The amount of net income (loss) derived from discontinued operations during the period, net of related tax effect, per each share of common stock or unit outstanding during the reporting period.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 942
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.9-04.23)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879574&loc=d3e536633-122882

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 225
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-03.21)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6880815&loc=d3e20235-122688

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 944
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.7-04.19)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879464&loc=d3e573970-122913

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7655603&loc=d3e1278-109256

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 03
-Paragraph 20
-Article 5

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 18
-Article 7

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 21
-Article 9

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 07-4
-Paragraph 4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 8, 9, 10, 36, 37, 38
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Schedule of Stock-Based Awards Excluded from Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (Detail) - shares shares in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Stock Options
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive stock based awards	20	21	19
Outstanding Stock Awards
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive stock based awards	1	1	1

- Definition

Securities (including those issuable pursuant to contingent stock agreements) that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share (EPS) or earnings per unit (EPU) in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS or EPU because to do so would increase EPS or EPU amounts or decrease loss per share or unit amounts for the period presented.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Antidilution
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6505113

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Diluted Earnings Per Share
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6510752

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Contingent Stock Agreement
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6508534

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (c)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6371337&loc=d3e3550-109257

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 40
-Subparagraph c
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 13, 14
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 07-4
-Paragraph 4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 128
-Paragraph 171
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Schedule of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Detail) - USD ($)
$ in Millions

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2012

Receivables, net:

Billed and billable receivables

$ 1,272

$ 1,558

Unbillable receivables, including contract retentions

626

612

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

(9)

(6)

Receivables, net

1,889

2,164

Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets:

Inventories

192

168

Prepaid expenses

Restricted cash

Deferred income taxes

Assets held for sale

Prepaid income taxes and tax refunds receivable

Other

Total inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets

454

439

Property, plant and equipment, net:

Computers and other equipment

314

305

Buildings and improvements

148

181

Leasehold improvements

212

194

Office furniture and fixtures

Land

Construction in progress

Property, plant and equipment, gross

760

772

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

(442)

(424)

Property, plant and equipment, net

318

348

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:

Accounts payable

435

485

Accrued liabilities

^[1]

682

1,265

Collections in excess of revenues on uncompleted contracts and deferred revenue

132

211

Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities

1,249

1,961

Accrued payroll and employee benefits:

Salaries, bonuses and amounts withheld from employees' compensation

298

251

Accrued vacation

236

246

Accrued contributions to employee benefit plans

Total Accrued payroll and employee benefits

542

504

Other long-term liabilities:

Accrued pension liabilities

Deferred compensation

Liabilities for uncertain tax positions

Deferred tax liabilities

Other

Total other long-term liabilities

$ 168

$ 162

[1]	Includes the $500 million CityTime obligation as of January 31, 2012 described in Note 17.

Schedule of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Parenthetical) (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2012 USD ($)
CityTime loss provision	$ 500

Schedule of Acquisition Information (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
Schedule of Acquisition Information (Detail) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2011 USD ($)
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Number of acquisitions	1	2	3
Cash consideration (paid and accrued)	$ 505	$ 223	$ 389

Schedule of Purchase Price Allocations Related to Acquisitions (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Tax deductible goodwill		$ 30	$ 16
Non-tax deductible goodwill	$ 395	$ 135	$ 223
Weighted average lives of finite-lived intangibles (years)	4 years	5 years	7 years
In-Process Research And Development
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Identifiable intangible assets (indefinite-lived)			$ 27
Customer Relationships
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Identifiable intangible assets (finite-lived)	$ 62	$ 28	$ 9
Weighted average lives of finite-lived intangibles (years)	5 years	5 years	2 years
Software and Technology
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Identifiable intangible assets (finite-lived)			$ 110
Weighted average lives of finite-lived intangibles (years)			8 years
Other
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Identifiable intangible assets (finite-lived)	$ 10	$ 1
Weighted average lives of finite-lived intangibles (years)	1 year	3 years

Acquisitions - Additional Information (Detail) - maxIT Healthcare Holdings, Inc. $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Percent of acquired stock	100.00%
Revenue from acquisition	$ 133
Operating income	$ 4

Estimated Fair Values of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed (Detail) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Business Combination Allocation of Purchase Price [Line Items]
Cash	$ 9
Receivables	50
Other assets	24
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued payroll and employee benefits	(21)
Deferred tax liabilities, net	(24)
Total identifiable net assets acquired	38
Goodwill	395
Intangible assets	72
Total preliminary purchase price (including accrued acquisition payments of $13 million)	$ 505

Estimated Fair Values of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed (Parenthetical) (Detail) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Business Combination Allocation of Purchase Price [Line Items]
Total preliminary purchase price, accrued acquisition payment	$ 13

- Definition

Fair Value of the liabilities incurred by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree, including the fair value of any contingent consideration. If liabilities transferred as consideration remain within the combined entity after the business combination (for example, because the assets or liabilities were transferred to the acquiree rather than to its former owners), and the acquirer therefore retains control of them; in that situation, the acquirer measures those liabilities at their carrying amounts immediately before the acquisition date.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 30
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6911251&loc=d3e6613-128477

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 30
-Paragraph 7
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6911251&loc=d3e6578-128477

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 25
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6911189&loc=d3e6405-128476

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 68
-Subparagraph f(3)
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141
-Paragraph 51
-Subparagraph d
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 39, 40, 41
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Schedule of Changes in Goodwill by Segment (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	$ 1,800	$ 1,638
Acquisitions	395	165
Adjustments		(3)
Ending balance, Goodwill	2,195	1,800
Defense Solutions
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	410	405
Adjustments		5
Ending balance, Goodwill	410	410
Health, Energy And Civil Solutions
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	759	608
Acquisitions	395	165
Adjustments	(10)	(14)
Ending balance, Goodwill	1,144	759
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	631	625
Adjustments	10	6
Ending balance, Goodwill	$ 641	$ 631

- Definition

Carrying amount as of the balance sheet date, which is the cumulative amount paid and (if applicable) the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, adjusted for any amortization recognized prior to the adoption of any changes in generally accepted accounting principles (as applicable) and for any impairment charges, in excess of the fair value of net assets acquired in one or more business combination transactions.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 350
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=14024403&loc=d3e13816-109267

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 350
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6388280&loc=d3e13770-109266

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 142
-Paragraph 45
-Subparagraph e
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 142
-Paragraph 43
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 72
-Subparagraph d
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 142
-Paragraph 45
-Subparagraph e
-Clause 1
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 68
-Subparagraph l
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 34
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Recast of goodwill to show effect of discontinued operations in reportable segments			$ 26
Finite-lived intangible assets, amortized amount	$ 25	$ 37
Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets	45	45	40
Impairment loss for intangible assets	13	19	4
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions
Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets	11	16	17
Impairment loss for intangible assets	$ 13	$ 19	$ 0

Schedule of Intangible Assets Including Estimates of Assets Acquired (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	$ 304	$ 270
Total intangible assets, Gross carrying value	321	287
Accumulated amortization	(131)	(111)
Net carrying value	173	159
Total intangible assets, Net carrying value	190	176
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	17	17
In-Process Research And Development
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	13	13
Trade Names
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	4	4
Customer Relationships
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	175	120
Accumulated amortization	(73)	(62)
Net carrying value	102	58
Software and Technology
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	127	148
Accumulated amortization	(57)	(48)
Net carrying value	70	100
Other
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	2	2
Accumulated amortization	(1)	(1)
Net carrying value	$ 1	$ 1

Schedule of Amortization Expense for Finite-Lived Intangible Assets (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Goodwill And Intangible Assets [Abstract]
2014	$ 44
2015	35
2016	32
2017	27
2018	18
2019 and thereafter	17
Net carrying value	$ 173	$ 159

Revolving Credit Facility - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($) yr	Jan. 31, 2012 USD ($)
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Unsecured borrowing capacity	$ 750
Extended maturity period of revolving credit facility (in years) \| yr	1
Extended maturity date of revolving credit facility	March 2016
Borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility	$ 0	$ 0
Revolving credit facility financial covenants description	For a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, the Company maintains a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this credit facility, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0.
Ratio of consolidated funded debt to EBITDA, numerator, maximum	3.0
Ratio of consolidated funded debt to EBITDA, denominator, maximum	1.0
Minimum ratio of EBITDA to interest expense, numerator	3.5
Minimum ratio of EBITDA to interest expense, denominator	1.0

Schedule of Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable and long-term debt	$ 1,298	$ 1,852
Less current portion	2	553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion	1,296	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt	1,390	2,011
Notes Which Mature In December 2020
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes	$ 449	449
Stated interest rate	4.45%
Effective interest rate	4.53%
Notes Which Mature In December 2040
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes	$ 300	300
Stated interest rate	5.95%
Effective interest rate	6.03%
Notes Which Mature In July 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes		550
Stated interest rate	6.25%
Effective interest rate	6.50%
Notes Which Mature In July 2032
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes	$ 248	248
Stated interest rate	7.13%
Effective interest rate	7.43%
Notes Which Mature In July 2033
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes	$ 297	296
Stated interest rate	5.50%
Effective interest rate	5.78%
Other Notes Payable Due On Various Dates Through Fiscal 2018
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2018	$ 4	$ 9
Minimum stated interest rate	0.00%
Maximum stated interest rate	2.50%

Schedule of Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Parenthetical) (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Notes Which Mature In December 2020
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	$ 450
Debt maturity date	Dec. 01, 2020
Notes Which Mature In December 2040
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	$ 300
Debt maturity date	Dec. 01, 2040
Notes Which Mature In July 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	$ 550
Debt maturity date	Jul. 01, 2012
Notes Which Mature In July 2032
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	$ 250
Debt maturity date	Jul. 01, 2032
Notes Which Mature In July 2033
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	$ 300
Debt maturity date	Jul. 01, 2033

Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Notes Which Mature In July 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Payments on notes payable	$ 550

Schedule of Maturities of Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Note Payable and Long-Term Debt
2014	$ 2
2015	2
2016	1
2017	1
2018
2019 and thereafter	1,300
Total principal payments	1,306
Less unamortized discount	8
Total notes payable and long-term debt	$ 1,298	$ 1,852

Related Party Transactions - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($) yr
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Credit facility, maturity date	2017
Related party maturity date	November 2013
Period extension for portions of intercompany loans (years) \| yr	1
Notes Which Mature In December 2020
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	$ 450
Stated interest rate	4.45%
Notes Which Mature In December 2040
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	$ 300
Stated interest rate	5.95%
Notes Which Mature In July 2033
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	$ 300
Stated interest rate	5.50%
Notes Which Mature In July 2032
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	$ 250
Stated interest rate	7.13%

Retirement Plans - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Line Items]
Maximum percentage certain employees can defer from salary for certain plans	20.00%
Pension plan asset	$ 46
Pension plan obligation	$ 63
Net actuarial gains (loss) recognize of the greater of the market related value of plan asset or projected benefit obligation	10.00%
Expected contributions in 2014	$ 5
Estimated annual benefit payments in 2014	2
Estimated annual benefit payments in 2015	2
Estimated annual benefit payments in 2016	2
Estimated annual benefit payments in 2017	2
Estimated annual benefit payments in 2018	2
Estimated annual benefit payments in 2019-2023	$ 13
Equity Securities
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Line Items]
Target allocation for securities	40.00%
Fixed-Income Securities
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Line Items]
Target allocation for securities	60.00%
Deferred Compensation Plans
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Line Items]
Compensation expense	$ 145	$ 150	$ 157
Deferred Compensation Plans \| Minimum
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Line Items]
Interest rate	3.10%
Deferred Compensation Plans \| Maximum
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Line Items]
Interest rate	4.10%

Schedule of Funded Status (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
Schedule of Funded Status (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$ 120
Interest cost	4	$ 7	$ 7
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	86	120
Funded status at end of year	(8)	(29)
Accumulated benefit obligation	94	149
Accrued pension liability (other long-term liabilities)	(8)	(29)
Net actuarial (gain) loss (pretax)	(1)	13
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	149	131
Interest cost	4	7
Actuarial loss	3	15
Benefits paid	(2)	(2)
Prior service costs		1
Settlements	(63)
Foreign exchange rate changes	3	(3)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	94	149	131
Change in Plan Assets
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	120	111
Actual return on plan assets	7	6
Benefits paid	(2)	(2)
Settlements	(46)
Company contributions	5	8
Foreign exchange rate changes	2	(3)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$ 86	$ 120	$ 111

Schedule of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Line Items]
Service cost			$ 1
Interest cost	$ 4	$ 7	7
Expected return on plan assets	(5)	(5)	(7)
Prior service costs		1
Contractual termination benefits			1
Net periodic benefit cost	$ (1)	$ 3	$ 2

- Definition

An amount calculated as a basis for determining the extent of delayed recognition of the effects of changes in the fair value of assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined based on the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-SubTopic 30
-Glossary Expected Return on Plan Assets
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6512136

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-SubTopic 60
-Glossary Expected Return on Plan Assets
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6512171

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (h)(3)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=21915506&loc=d3e1928-114920

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 87
-Paragraph 264
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5
-Subparagraph h
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 106
-Paragraph 518
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

- Definition

The increase in a defined benefit pension plan's projected benefit obligation or a defined benefit postretirement plan's accumulated postretirement benefit obligation due to the passage of time.

+ References + Details

- Definition

The actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the pension benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the period. The portion of the expected postretirement benefit obligation attributed to employee service during the period. The service cost component is a portion of the benefit obligation and is unaffected by the funded status of the plan.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Service Cost (Component of Net Periodic Pension Cost)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6525008

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (h)(1)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=21915506&loc=d3e1928-114920

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (a)(1)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=21915506&loc=d3e1928-114920

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 87
-Paragraph 264
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5
-Subparagraph a, h
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 106
-Paragraph 518
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Schedule of Assumptions used to Determine Benefit Obligations (Detail)	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the plan's measurement date:
Discount rate	4.70%	4.40%
Rate of compensation increase	0.00%	3.80%

Schedule of Assumptions used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate	4.40%	5.60%	5.50%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	4.20%	4.60%	6.80%
Rate of compensation increase	0.00%	4.40%	4.30%

Schedule of Fair Value of Plan Assets (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	$ 86	$ 120
Cash
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	1	40
International Equity Securities
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	37	44
United Kingdom Government Bonds
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	17	15
Corporate Bonds
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	31	21
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	1	40
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 \| Cash
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	1	40
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	85	80
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 \| International Equity Securities
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	37	44
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 \| United Kingdom Government Bonds
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	17	15
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 \| Corporate Bonds
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	$ 31	$ 21

- Definition

Assets, usually stocks, bonds, and other investments, that have been segregated and restricted (usually in a trust) to provide benefits, at their fair value as of the measurement date. Plan assets include amounts contributed by the employer (and by employees for a contributory plan) and amounts earned from investing the contributions, less benefits paid. If a plan has liabilities other than for benefits, those non-benefit obligations may be considered as reductions of plan assets.

+ References + Details

Stock-Based Compensation - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($) yr shares	Jan. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2011 USD ($)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	3 years
Expected term	5 years	4 years 10 months 24 days	3 years 9 months 18 days
Fair value of vesting awards that vested		$ 67.0	$ 64.0
Maximum percentage that will ultimately be awarded	150.00%
Minimum number of shares issued based on performance \| shares	0
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Rights	For awards granted in fiscal 2013, one-third of the target number of shares of stock granted under the awards will be allocated to each fiscal year over the three-year performance period and the actual number of shares to be issued with respect to each fiscal year will be based upon the achievement of that fiscal year's performance criteria.
Performance Based Restricted Stock Awards
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures	$ 6.2
Expected weighted-average period of recognition, years	1 year 10 months 24 days
Stock Options
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	4 years
Aggregate intrinsic value for options exercisable	$ 0.0
Unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures	$ 15.0
Expected weighted-average period of recognition, years	2 years
Stock Options \| Maximum
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected term	10 years
Outside Directors
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	1 year
Outside Directors \| Stock Options
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	1 year
Vesting Stock Awards
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures	$ 98.0
Expected weighted-average period of recognition, years	2 years 3 months 18 days
Vesting Stock Awards \| Group One
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	4 years
Vesting Stock Awards \| Group Two
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	7 years
2006 Equity Incentive Plan
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Period of exercise of vested options after participants death or disability	18 months
Stock awards exercisable period (in months)	Six
Percentage of stock awards vest or exercisable after one year	20.00%
Percentage of stock awards vest or exercisable after two years	20.00%
Percentage of stock awards vest or exercisable after three years	20.00%
Percentage of stock awards vest or exercisable after four years	40.00%
Stock reserved for future issuance \| shares	18,000,000
Award vesting period (in years) \| yr	7
Vesting interest each year	One-third
Years of interest rates	Fifth, sixth and seventh
Percentage of stock compensation plans awards that vest after January 1, 2006	100.00%
2006 Equity Incentive Plan \| Stock Options
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	4 years
Expected term	5 years		7 years
2006 Equity Incentive Plan \| Group One
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	4 years
2006 Equity Incentive Plan \| Group Two
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	7 years
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Percentage of market price per share for stock purchase program	15.00%
Percentage of market price for employee purchase program for stock purchases during non-compensatory period	5.00%
Shares authorized and reserved for future issuance under the ESPP \| shares	39,000,000

Schedule of Stock-Based Compensation and Related Tax Benefits Recognized (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations	$ 84	$ 83	$ 99
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in discontinued operations		2	3
Tax benefits recognized from stock-based compensation	33	33	40
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	2	3	4
Stock Options
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations	13	17	19
Performance-Based Stock Awards
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations	2	(5)	5
Vesting Stock Awards
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations	$ 69	70	74
Vested Stock Awards
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in continuing operations		$ 1	$ 1

Schedule of Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value and Assumptions Used (Detail) - $ / shares	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$ 1.81	$ 4.21	$ 3.96
Expected term (in years)	5 years	4 years 10 months 24 days	3 years 9 months 18 days
Expected volatility	24.50%	23.40%	25.10%
Risk-free interest rate	1.00%	2.20%	2.10%
Dividend yield	3.70%	0.00%	0.00%

Schedule of Stock Option Activity (Detail) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Millions, $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011	Jan. 31, 2010
Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Shares of stock under stock options, Outstanding, beginning balance	20.8	25.0	31.6
Shares of stock under stock options, Options granted	5.0	3.9	5.3
Shares of stock under stock options, Options forfeited or expired	(6.2)	(3.6)	(2.8)
Shares of stock under stock options, Options exercised		(4.5)	(9.1)
Shares of stock under stock options, Outstanding, ending balance	19.6	20.8	25.0	31.6
Shares of stock under stock option, Vested and expected to vest in the future as of January 31, 2013	9.0
Weighted average exercise price, Outstanding, beginning balance	$ 17.90	$ 17.31	$ 16.26
Weighted average exercise price, Options granted	13.20	16.92	17.43
Weighted average exercise price, Options forfeited or expired	17.54	16.73	16.14
Weighted average exercise price, Options exercised		14.69	14.08
Weighted average exercise price, Outstanding, ending balance	16.81	$ 17.90	$ 17.31	$ 16.26
Weighted average exercise price, Vested and expected to vest in the future as of ending period	$ 18.30
Weighted average remaining contractual term, Outstanding	3 years	2 years 6 months	2 years 1 month 6 days	2 years
Aggregate intrinsic value, Outstanding, beginning balance		$ 11	$ 66
Weighted average remaining contractual term, Vested and expected to vest, years	1 year 2 months 12 days
Aggregate intrinsic value, Outstanding, Option Exercised		$ 8	36
Aggregate intrinsic value, Outstanding, ending balance			$ 11	$ 66
Aggregate intrinsic value, Outstanding, Vested and expected to vest

Schedule Of Share-Based Compensation Activity Related To Exercise Of Stock Options (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Cash received from exercises of stock options	$ 1	$ 6
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options	14	41
Tax benefits realized from exercises of stock options	$ 4	$ 17

Schedule of Options Outstanding (Detail) shares in Millions	12 Months Ended
Schedule of Options Outstanding (Detail) shares in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013 $ / shares shares
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Stock options outstanding \| shares	19.6
Weighted average exercise price	$ 16.81
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	3 years
Stock options exercisable \| shares	9.0
Weighted average exercise price	$ 18.30
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	1 year 2 months 12 days
$12.00 To $17.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Minimum exercise price	$ 12.00
Maximum exercise price	$ 17.00
Stock options outstanding \| shares	7.7
Weighted average exercise price	$ 14.60
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	5 years 9 months 18 days
Stock options exercisable \| shares	0.7
Weighted average exercise price	$ 16.88
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	5 years 1 month 6 days
$17.01 To $18.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Minimum exercise price	$ 17.01
Maximum exercise price	$ 18.00
Stock options outstanding \| shares	3.8
Weighted average exercise price	$ 17.42
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	2 years 2 months 12 days
Stock options exercisable \| shares	1.6
Weighted average exercise price	$ 17.43
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	2 years 2 months 12 days
$18.01 To $19.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Minimum exercise price	$ 18.01
Maximum exercise price	$ 19.00
Stock options outstanding \| shares	8.0
Weighted average exercise price	$ 18.59
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	8 months 12 days
Stock options exercisable \| shares	6.5
Weighted average exercise price	$ 18.63
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	6 months
$19.01 To $21.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Minimum exercise price	$ 19.01
Maximum exercise price	$ 21.00
Stock options outstanding \| shares	0.1
Weighted average exercise price	$ 20.12
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	7 months 6 days
Stock options exercisable \| shares	0.2
Weighted average exercise price	$ 20.12
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	7 months 6 days

Schedule of Vesting Stock Award Activity (Detail) - Vesting Stock Awards shares in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 $ / shares shares
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares, beginning balance \| shares	12.0
Shares of stock under stock awards, Awards granted \| shares	6.7
Shares of stock under stock awards, Awards forfeited \| shares	(1.4)
Shares of stock under stock awards, Awards vested \| shares	(4.9)
Shares, ending balance \| shares	12.4
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, beginning balance \| $ / shares	$ 17.50
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards granted \| $ / shares	13.12
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards forfeited \| $ / shares	15.71
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards vested \| $ / shares	17.82
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, ending balance \| $ / shares	$ 15.20

Schedule of Performance-Based Stock Award Activity (Detail) - Performance-Based Stock Awards shares in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 $ / shares shares
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares, beginning balance \| shares	0.5
Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance-based stock awards, Awards granted \| shares	0.8
Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance-based stock awards, Awards forfeited \| shares	0.0
Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance-based stock awards, Adjustment to expected number of shares of stock to be issued \| shares	(0.3)
Shares, ending balance \| shares	1.0
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, beginning balance \| $ / shares	$ 17.02
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards granted \| $ / shares	13.13
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards forfeited \| $ / shares	15.26
Weighted average grant-date fair value, adjustments to expected number of shares of stock to be issued \| $ / shares	16.84
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, ending balance \| $ / shares	$ 13.24

Schedule of Provision for Income Taxes (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Income Taxes [Abstract]
Current, Federal and foreign	$ 39	$ 218	$ 254
Current, State	24	23	47
Deferred, Federal and foreign	61	(20)	9
Deferred, State	11	(11)	(3)
Total	$ 135	$ 210	$ 307

- Definition

The component of income tax expense for the period representing amounts paid or payable (or refundable) as determined by applying the provisions of enacted federal tax law to the domestic taxable Income or Loss from continuing operations.

+ References

+ Details

- Definition

The component of income tax expense for the period representing amounts paid or payable (or refundable) as determined by applying the provisions of enacted state and local tax law to relevant amounts of taxable Income or Loss from continuing operations.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 6.I.7)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6889476&loc=d3e330036-122817

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Current Tax Expense (or Benefit)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6509736

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 9
-Subparagraph (a)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32639-109319

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(h))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 109
-Paragraph 45
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 08
-Paragraph h
-Article 4

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
-Number Topic 6
-Section I
-Subsection 7

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 109
-Paragraph 289
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

- Definition

The component of total income tax expense for the period comprised of the increase (decrease) during the period in the entity's domestic deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to continuing operations as determined by applying the provisions of the federally enacted tax law.

+ References

+ Details

- Definition

The component of total income tax expense for the period comprised of the increase (decrease) in the entity's state and local deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to continuing operations as determined by applying the provisions of the applicable enacted tax laws.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Deferred Tax Expense (or Benefit)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6510177

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(h))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 6.I.7)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6889476&loc=d3e330036-122817

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 9
-Subparagraph (b)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32639-109319

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 109
-Paragraph 45
-Subparagraph b
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 109
-Paragraph 8, 16, 17, 289
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
-Number Topic 6
-Section I
-Subsection 7

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 08
-Paragraph h
-Article 4

+ Details

- Definition

The sum of the current income tax expense or benefit and the deferred income tax expense or benefit pertaining to pretax Income or Loss from continuing operations; income tax expense or benefit may include interest and penalties on tax uncertainties based on the entity's accounting policy.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 9
-Subparagraph (a),(b)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32639-109319

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 25
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=21917399&loc=d3e32247-109318

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(h))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32672-109319

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 109
-Paragraph 45, 46
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 08
-Paragraph h
-Article 4

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Interpretation (FIN)
-Number 48
-Paragraph 15, 16, 19
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Schedule of Reconciliation of Provision for Income Taxes (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Income Taxes [Abstract]
Amount computed at the statutory federal income tax rate (35%)	$ 230	$ 68	$ 299
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit	22	8	28
Change in accruals for uncertain tax positions		1	(7)
CityTime uncertain tax liability	(96)	96
Research and development credits	(10)	(7)	(8)
Dividends paid to employee stock ownership plan	(9)
U.S. manufacturing activity benefit	(2)	(5)	(5)
Non-deductible penalties		49
Total	$ 135	$ 210	$ 307
Effective income tax rate	20.50%	107.70%	35.90%

Schedule of Reconciliation of Provision for Income Taxes (Parenthetical) (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Reconciliation of Provision of Income Taxes [Line Items]
Statutory federal income tax rate	35.00%	35.00%	35.00%

Income Taxes - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Decrease in unrecognized tax benefits due to resolutions with tax authorities	$ 96	$ 7
Reversal of accruals for unrecognized tax benefits	2	10	$ 1
Unrecognized tax benefits accrued interest and penalties	3	3
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions	24	132
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions, long-term	24	$ 29
Amount of reasonably possible resolution of reviews	16
Reduction in income tax expense	(14)
Federal and State
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Reversal of accruals for unrecognized tax benefits	7
Federal
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Net operating loss carryforwards	$ 41
Expiration of NOL	2023 to 2030
State
Income Taxes [Line Items]
State tax credit carryforwards	$ 12
Expiration of state tax credit carryforwards	2018 to 2027
Tax Credit Carry forward expected to utilize amount	$ 10

Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities) (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Income Taxes [Abstract]
Accrued vacation and bonuses	$ 83	$ 88
Investments	5	8
Deferred compensation	52	54
Vesting stock awards	54	61
Credits and net operating losses carryovers	34	35
Employee benefit contributions	1	6
CityTime loss provision		63
Other	33	32
Total deferred tax assets	262	347
Valuation allowance	(7)	(2)
Deferred revenue	(79)	(68)
Fixed asset basis differences	(14)	(25)
Purchased intangible assets	(155)	(133)
Total deferred tax liabilities	(248)	(226)
Net deferred tax assets	$ 7	$ 119

Schedule of Net Deferred Tax Assets (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Income Taxes [Abstract]
Net current deferred tax assets	$ 18	$ 82
Net non-current deferred tax (liabilities) assets	(11)	37
Net deferred tax assets	$ 7	$ 119

Schedule of Changes in Unrecognized Tax Benefits (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Income Tax Contingency [Line Items]
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year	$ 129	$ 23	$ 44
Additions for tax positions related to current year		102	1
Additions for tax positions related to prior years	2	10	1
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years	(107)	(4)	(8)
Settlements with taxing authorities	(1)		(12)
Lapse of statute of limitations	(2)	(2)	(3)
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year	21	129	23
Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate	$ 17	$ 115	$ 17

Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss [Abstract]
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) and $(2) million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$ 2	$ 2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012	(5)	(5)
Unrecognized gain (loss) on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $0 million and $5 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	1	(8)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $2 million and $6 million as of January 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$ (2)	$ (11)

- Definition

Accumulated change, net of tax, in accumulated gains and losses from derivative instruments designated and qualifying as the effective portion of cash flow hedges. Includes an entity's share of an equity investee's Increase or Decrease in deferred hedging gains or losses.

+ References + Details

- Definition

The total of net gain (loss), prior service cost (credit), and transition assets (obligations), as well as minimum pension liability if still remaining, included in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan(s) because they have yet to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 10A
-Subparagraph (j-k)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=SL7669646-108580

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 11
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=d3e637-108580

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 14
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=d3e681-108580

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 715
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (i)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=21915506&loc=d3e1928-114920

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 14A
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=SL7669686-108580

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 130
-Paragraph 26
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 158
-Paragraph 7
-Subparagraph c
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 132R
-Paragraph 5
-Subparagraph i
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

- Definition

Accumulated adjustment, net of tax, that results from the process of translating subsidiary financial statements and foreign equity investments into the reporting currency from the functional currency of the reporting entity, net of reclassification of realized foreign currency translation gains or losses.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 14
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=d3e681-108580

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 11
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=d3e637-108580

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 10A
-Subparagraph (a)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=SL7669646-108580

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 14A
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=SL7669686-108580

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 830
-SubTopic 30
-Section 45
-Paragraph 12
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6915805&loc=d3e32022-110900

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 830
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6450520&loc=d3e32583-110901

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 52
-Paragraph 12, 13
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 133
-Paragraph 45
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 52
-Paragraph 31
-Subparagraph a
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
-Number 12
-Paragraph 10
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 130
-Paragraph 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

- Definition

Accumulated change in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources, net of tax effect, at period end. Excludes Net Income (Loss), and accumulated changes in equity from transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Includes foreign currency translation items, certain pension adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt and equity securities, other than temporary impairment (OTTI) losses related to factors other than credit losses on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities that an entity does not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell before recovery of the amortized cost basis, as well as changes in the fair value of derivatives related to the effective portion of a designated cash flow hedge.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 11
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=d3e637-108580

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 14
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=d3e681-108580

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 14A
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=SL7669686-108580

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 02
-Paragraph 31
-Article 5

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Staff Position (FSP)
-Number FAS115-1/124-1
-Paragraph 15D
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
-Number 12
-Paragraph 10
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 130
-Paragraph 14, 17, 26
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Article 3

+ Details

Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Parenthetical) (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Foreign currency translation adjustments, tax effect	$ (1)	$ (2)
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, tax effect	3	3
Unrecognized loss on defined benefit plan, tax effect	0	5
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, tax effect	$ 2	$ 6

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Maximum
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Unrealized net loss on settled derivatives which will be amortized and recognized	$ (1)

Schedule of Rental Expense for Facilities and Equipment (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Leases [Abstract]
Gross rental expense	$ 170	$ 177	$ 173
Less lease and sublease income	(5)	(17)	(23)
Net rental expense	$ 165	$ 160	$ 150

- Definition

This element represents the payments that the lessee is obligated to make or can be required to make in connection with a property under the terms of an agreement classified as an operating lease, excluding contingent rentals and a guarantee by the lessee of the lessor's debt and the lessee's obligation to pay (apart from the rental payments) executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes.

+ References + Details

Leases - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
Leases - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($) yr
Leases [Line Items]
Maximum contingent lease liability	$ 21
Operating lease from a subcontractor, term (years) \| yr	10
Capital lease obligations	$ 4

Schedule of Future Minimum Lease Commitments and Sublease Receipts under Non-Cancelable Operating Leases (Detail) $ in Millions	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Operating lease Commitment
2014	$ 121
2015	113
2016	95
2017	73
2018	60
2019 and thereafter	110
Total	572
Lease or Sublease receipt
2014	2
2015	2
2016	2
2017	2
2018	1
2019 and thereafter	8
Total	$ 17

Schedule of Supplementary Income Statement Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Supplemental Financial Information [Line Items]
Depreciation and amortization expense for property, plant and equipment and assets acquired under capital leases	$ 68	$ 69	$ 70
Internal research and development costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses	$ 64	$ 92	$ 55

- Definition

The aggregate costs incurred (1) in a planned search or critical investigation aimed at discovery of new knowledge with the hope that such knowledge will be useful in developing a new product or service, a new process or technique, or in bringing about a significant improvement to an existing product or process; or (2) to translate research findings or other knowledge into a plan or design for a new product or process or for a significant improvement to an existing product or process whether intended for sale or the entity's use, during the reporting period charged to research and development projects, including the costs of developing computer software up to the point in time of achieving technological feasibility, and costs allocated in accounting for a business combination to in-process projects deemed to have no alternative future use.

+ References + Details

Schedule of Supplementary Cash Flow Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Supplemental Financial Information [Line Items]
Decrease in accrued stock repurchases		$ (7)	$ (17)
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividends	$ 3
Fair value of assets acquired in acquisitions	541	238	470
Cash paid in acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $9 million, $5 million and $10 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively	(483)	(218)	(382)
Non-cash consideration
Accrued acquisition payables, net	(13)		(4)
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions	45	20	84
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations)	92	107	71
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$ 128	$ 289	$ 361

Schedule of Supplementary Cash Flow Information (Parenthetical) (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Supplemental Financial Information [Line Items]
Cash acquired in acquisitions	$ 9	$ 5	$ 10

Schedule of Segment Reporting Information by Segment (Detail) - USD ($)
$ in Millions

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2012

Jul. 31, 2012

Apr. 30, 2012

Jan. 31, 2012

^[1]

Oct. 31, 2011

^[1]

Jul. 31, 2011

^[1]

Apr. 30, 2011

^[1]

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2012

Jan. 31, 2011

Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]

Revenues

$ 2,711

$ 2,870

$ 2,828

$ 2,764

$ 2,471

$ 2,790

$ 2,573

$ 2,663

$ 11,173

$ 10,497

$ 10,798

Operating income (loss)

$ 145

$ 193

$ 188

$ 208

$ (114)

$ (20)

$ 206

$ 227

734

299

929

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Defense Solutions

Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]

Revenues

4,718

4,191

4,657

Operating income (loss)

352

(171)

380

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Health, Energy And Civil Solutions

Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]

Revenues

2,788

2,734

2,630

Operating income (loss)

222

246

242

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions

Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]

Revenues

3,672

3,574

3,460

Operating income (loss)

264

279

292

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Corporate and Other

Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]

Revenues

Operating income (loss)

(104)

(55)

Intersegment Elimination

Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]

Revenues

$ (5)

$ (4)

$ (7)

[1]	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.

Business Segment Information - Additional Information (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of revenues contributed by external customers to total revenues	10.00%

Schedule of Total Revenue Percentages Contributable to Specific Government Agencies (Detail) - Government Contracts Concentration Risk	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
U.S. Government
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Percentage of sales	87.00%	93.00%	91.00%
U.S. Army
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Percentage of sales	28.00%	26.00%	23.00%
U.S. Navy
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Percentage of sales	13.00%	13.00%	13.00%

Discontinued Operations - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Proceeds from discontinued operations	$ 51	$ 167
Gain on sale before Income Tax	17	$ 111
Cash received for the settlement of arbitration proceedings	$ 80
Pre-tax gain (losses)related to actions			$ 77

Schedule of Pre-Sale Operating Results of Discontinued Operations (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011
Discontinued Operation
Revenues	$ 56	$ 160	$ 319
Cost of revenues	50	131	258
Selling, general and administrative expenses	3	13	31
Operating income	$ 3	$ 16	$ 30

Legal Proceedings - Additional Information (Detail) Item in Millions	1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2010 USD ($)	Oct. 31, 2008 USD ($)	Jul. 31, 2008 USD ($)	Apr. 30, 2012 LegalMatter	Jan. 31, 2013 USD ($) yr LegalMatter Item	Jan. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2011 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2009 USD ($)	Nov. 30, 2008 USD ($)
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
DPA provides that the monitor will serve for a period (in years) \| yr					3
Number of patients (in millions) \| Item					5
Number of lawsuits \| LegalMatter					7
Period of identity restoration services \| yr					1
Damages sought					$ 1,000
Amount outstanding					0	$ 0
Timekeeping Contract with City of New York
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Cash settlement payment					500,000,000
Data Privacy Litigation
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Judgments or settlements relating to the claims					10,000,000
Estimated loss, minimum					10,000,000
Stockholder Derivative Cases
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Number of lawsuits \| LegalMatter				6
Number of lawsuits, withdrawn \| LegalMatter				2
Number of lawsuits, consolidated \| LegalMatter				4
Securities Class Actions
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Number of lawsuits \| LegalMatter				3
Number of lawsuits, withdrawn \| LegalMatter				1
Number of lawsuits, consolidated \| LegalMatter				2
Greek Government Contract
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Damages sought by SAIC								$ 94,000,000
Profit or loss recorded on contract					0	$ 0	$ 0
Recorded losses					123,000,000
Greek Government Contract \| Invoice for Undisputed Portion of Contract
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Contracts receivable									$ 19,000,000
Greek Government Contract \| Letters of Credit Relating to Delivery
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Letter of credit available to the company					20,000,000
Greek Government Contract \| Standby Letters of Credit
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Letter of credit available to the company					23,000,000
Greek Government Contract \| Value Added Taxes
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Contracts receivable					34,000,000
Receivables relating to value added taxes					16,000,000
Greek Government Contract \| Letters of Credit Related System Support and Maintenance \| Letters of Credit Relating to Delivery
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Amount outstanding					$ 3,000,000
Greek Government Contract \| Performance Guarantee
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Damages sought by SAIC								$ 26,000,000
Nuclear Regulatory Commission \| Breach of Contract
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Loss related to litigation settlement	$ 78		$ 78
Nuclear Regulatory Commission \| False Claims Act Claims
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Judgment rescinded on appeal		$ 585,000	$ 2,000,000

Other Commitments and Contingencies - Additional Information (Detail)
$ in Millions

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

USD ($)

Oct. 31, 2012

USD ($)

Jul. 31, 2012

USD ($)

Apr. 30, 2012

USD ($)

Jan. 31, 2012

USD ($)

Oct. 31, 2011

USD ($)

Jul. 31, 2011

USD ($)

^[1]

Apr. 30, 2011

USD ($)

^[1]

Jan. 31, 2013

USD ($)

Jan. 31, 2012

USD ($)

Jan. 31, 2011

USD ($)

Mar. 31, 2006

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Patents transferred and awarded

$ 80

Percentage of proceeds obtained

25.00%

Aggregate loss provisions

$ 308

$ 232

Project financing from the company's provision of extended payment terms

$ 100

Total project billings

220

Receivable due from VIE

$ 53

Revenues

2,711

$ 2,870

$ 2,828

$ 2,764

2,471

^[1]

$ 2,790

^[1]

$ 2,573

$ 2,663

11,173

10,497

$ 10,798

Government Investigations And Reviews

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Aggregate loss provisions

Liability for estimate of loss

Contract

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Revenues

481

Reduction in revenue

Potential Insurance Claims

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Estimate of possible loss

$ 34

Standby Letters of Credit

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Amount outstanding

108

Performance Guarantee

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Surety bonds

$ 302

Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Ownership interest

30.00%

DS and S

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Ownership interest

50.00%

Gain on sale of interest in joint venture

$ 4

Amount to be paid in satisfaction of indemnification obligation

$ 4

Virnet X Inc

Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]

Number of patents infringed

Patents transferred and awarded

$ 368

[1]	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.

Schedule of Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Detail) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Millions

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2012

Jul. 31, 2012

Apr. 30, 2012

Jan. 31, 2012

^[1]

Oct. 31, 2011

^[1]

Jul. 31, 2011

^[1]

Apr. 30, 2011

^[1]

Jan. 31, 2013

Jan. 31, 2012

Jan. 31, 2011

Quarterly Financial Information [Line Items]

Revenues

$ 2,711

$ 2,870

$ 2,828

$ 2,764

$ 2,471

$ 2,790

$ 2,573

$ 2,663

$ 11,173

$ 10,497

$ 10,798

Operating income

145

193

188

208

(114)

(20)

206

227

734

299

929

Income (loss) from continuing operations

186

^[2]

112

^[2]

108

^[2]

117

^[2]

(161)

^[2]

(92)

^[2]

110

^[2]

128

^[2]

523

(15)

547

Income from discontinued operations

Net income

$ 186

^[2]

$ 112

^[2]

$ 110

^[2]

$ 117

^[2]

$ (161)

^[2]

$ (89)

^[2]

$ 178

^[2]

$ 131

^[2]

$ 525

$ 59

$ 619

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.54

^[3]

$ 0.33

^[3]

$ 0.32

^[3]

$ 0.35

^[3]

$ (0.49)

^[3]

$ (0.27)

^[3]

$ 0.51

^[3]

$ 0.37

^[3]

$ 1.54

$ 0.18

$ 1.65

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.54

^[3]

$ 0.33

^[3]

$ 0.32

^[3]

$ 0.35

^[3]

$ (0.49)

^[3]

$ (0.27)

^[3]

$ 0.50

^[3]

$ 0.36

^[3]

$ 1.54

$ 0.18

$ 1.64

Science Applications International Corporation

Quarterly Financial Information [Line Items]

Revenues

$ 11,173

$ 10,497

$ 10,798

Operating income

734

299

929

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$ 187

$ 112

$ 108

$ 117

$ (161)

$ (94)

$ 110

$ 127

524

(18)

539

Income from discontinued operations

Net income

$ 187

$ 112

$ 110

$ 117

$ (161)

$ (91)

$ 178

$ 130

$ 526

$ 56

$ 611

[1]	Includes loss provisions of $232 million and $308 million recorded in the third quarter and fourth quarter, respectively, in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 17.
[2]	Income from continuing operations and net income relate to SAIC only, see Science Applications' amounts detailed below.
[3]	Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented and therefore may not sum to the total for the fiscal year.

- Definition

The amount of net income (loss) for the period per each share of common stock or unit outstanding during the reporting period.

+ References

+ Details

- Definition

+ References + Details

- Definition

Amount of income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the parent. Also defined as revenue less expenses and taxes from ongoing operations before extraordinary items but after deduction of those portions of income or loss from continuing operations that are allocable to noncontrolling interests.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 230
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 28
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6943989&loc=d3e3602-108585

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (a)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6371337&loc=d3e3550-109257

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 225
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-03.13)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6880815&loc=d3e20235-122688

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 810
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 18
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7656940&loc=SL4613673-111683

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 38
-Subparagraph b(1)
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 29
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 28
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

- Definition

Amount of income (loss) from a disposal group, net of income tax before extraordinary items allocable to noncontrolling interests. Includes, net of tax, income (loss) from operations during the phase-out period, gain (loss) on disposal, provision (or any reversals of earlier provisions) for loss on disposal, and adjustments of a prior period gain (loss) on disposal.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 944
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.7-04.12)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879464&loc=d3e573970-122913

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 225
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-03.14)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6880815&loc=d3e20235-122688

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (c)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1361-107760

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6892542&loc=d3e957-107759

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 13
-Article 7

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 29
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 144
-Paragraph 43
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 144
-Paragraph 47
-Subparagraph c
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 03
-Paragraph 15
-Article 5

+ Details

- Definition

The portion of profit or loss for the period, net of income taxes, which is attributable to the parent.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Net Income
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6518256

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 230
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 28
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6943989&loc=d3e3602-108585

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 944
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.7-04.19)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879464&loc=d3e573970-122913

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 260
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6371337&loc=d3e3550-109257

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 225
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-03.18)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6880815&loc=d3e20235-122688

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 944
-SubTopic 225
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.7-04.22)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6879464&loc=d3e573970-122913

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Glossary Other Comprehensive Income
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6519514

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 220
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 6
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=20435746&loc=d3e565-108580

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 38
-Subparagraph d
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 130
-Paragraph 10, 15
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph A7
-Appendix A

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 87-21
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 03
-Paragraph 19
-Article 5

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 38
-Subparagraph a
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 95
-Paragraph 28, 29, 30
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 04
-Paragraph 20
-Article 9

+ Details

Schedule of Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Parenthetical) (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Quarterly Financial Information [Line Items]
Loss provision	$ 308	$ 232

Subsequent Event - Additional Information (Detail) - Dividend Declared	1 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2013 $ / shares
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Dividend declared	$ 1.00
Dividends Payable, Date to be Paid	Jun. 28, 2013
Dividends Payable, Date of Record	Jun. 14, 2013